The middle classes and the remaking of the suburban family community: evidence from the Netherlands

  • Lia Karsten
  • Tineke Lupi
  • Marlies de Stigter-Speksnijder
Article

Abstract

This paper presents data on everyday life in three recently built Dutch suburban areas constructed under the Vinex national urban planning policy. Its focus is on family households and today’s division of work and care, social life and neighbourhood activism. The results show that suburbs are no longer breeding grounds for the traditional nuclear family. But, while the rate of working mothers is high, the limited use of professional child care still reflects the tradition that maintains that children are best cared for in the private domain. Having children is crucial for putting down roots and developing social networks. In contrast to the past, both working mothers and fathers are actively constructing family communities. The newly established family communities are firmly of the middle class and tend to exclude childless and lowerclass households. Neighbourhood activism involves both the reproduction of an unspoiled and orderly environment and the realisation of a suburban paradise for children. This paper further reveals differences in the suburban areas studied and discusses the false dichotomy between the urban and the suburban within the metropolitan area.

Keywords

Daily life Middle class families Neighbourhood Social networks Gender divisions of work and care 

References

  1. Aitken, S. C. (1998). Family fantasies and community space. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Atkinson, R. (2006). Padding the bunker: Strategies of middle-class disaffiliation and colonization in the city. Urban Studies, 43(4), 819–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Atkinson, R., & Flint, J. (2004). Fortress UK? Gated communities, the spatial revolt of the elites and time space trajectories of segregation. Housing Studies, 19(6), 875–892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baldassare, M. (1986). Trouble in paradise. The suburban transformation in America. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Baldassare, M. (1992). Suburban communities. Annual review of sociology, 18, 475–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baumgartner, M. P. (1988). The moral order of a suburb. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Baxandall, R., & Ewen, E. (2000). Picture windows. How the suburbs happened. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  8. Bell, W. (1958). Social choice, life styles, and suburban residence. In W. M. Dobriner (Ed.), The suburban community (pp. 209–224). New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons.Google Scholar
  9. Bontje, M. (2001). The challenge of planned urbanization. Urbanization and national urbanisation policy in the Netherlands in a Northwestern-European perspective. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  10. Boterman, W., Karsten, L., & Musterd, S. (2010). Gentrifiers settling down? Patterns and trends of residential location of middle class families in Amsterdam. Housing Studies, 25(5), 693–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Butler, T. (2007). Re-urbanizing London Docklands: Gentrification, suburbanization or new urbanism? International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 31(4), 759–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cheshire, L., Walters, P., & Wickes, R. (2010). Privatisation, security and community: How master planned estates are changing suburban Australia. Urban Policy and Research, 28(4), 359–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clapson, M. (1998). Invincible green suburbs, brave new towns. Social change and urban dispersal in post-war England. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Clapson, M. (2003). Suburban century. Social change and urban growth in England and the United States. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
  15. de Meester, E., Mulder, C. H., & Droogleever Fortuijn, J. (2007). Time spent in paid work by women and men in urban and less urban contexts in the Netherlands. TESG, 98(5), 585–602.Google Scholar
  16. de Meester, E., Zorlu, A., & Mulder, C. H. (2011). The residential context and the division of household and childcare tasks. Environment and Planning A, 43(3), 666–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dowling, R. (1998a). Neotraditionalism in the suburban landscape: Cultural geographies of exclusion in Vancouver, Canada. Urban Geography, 19(2), 105–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dowling, R. (1998b). Suburban stories, gendered lives: Thinking through difference. In R. Fincher & J. Jacobs (Eds.), Cities of difference (pp. 69–88). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  19. Dowling, R., Atkinson, R., & McGuirk, P. (2010). Privatism, privatisation and social distinction in master-planned residential estates. Urban Policy and Research, 28(4), 391–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dreier, P., Mollenkopf, J., & Swanstrom, T. (2001). Place matters. Metropolitics for the twenty-first century. Lawrence, KA: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
  21. Droogleever Fortuijn, J., & Karsten, L. (1989). Daily activity patterns of working parents in the Netherlands. Area, 21, 365–376.Google Scholar
  22. Duncan, J. S., & Duncan, N. G. (2004). Landscapes of privilege. The politics of aesthetics in an American suburb. New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Dyck, I. (1990). Space, time and renegotiating motherhood: An exploration of the domestic work place. Environment and Planning D, 8(4), 459–483.Google Scholar
  24. England, K. (1993). Suburban pink collar ghettos. The spatial entrapment of women? Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 83(2), 225–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fincher, R., & Jacobs, J. M. (Eds.). (1998). Cities of difference. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  26. Gans, H. (1967). The Levittowners: Ways of life and politics in a new suburban community (1986 ed.). New York: Colombia University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Gray, J., Corcoran, M. J., & Peillon, M. (2009). Local family circles and suburban social life in Ireland. (NIRSA Working Paper Series No. 43).Google Scholar
  28. Guest, A. M., Cover, J. K., Matsueda, R. L., & Kubrin, C. E. (2006). Neighborhood context and neighboring ties. City & Community, 5(4), 363–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hampton, K., & Wellman, B. (2003). Neighbouring in Netville: How the internet supports community and social capital wired suburb. City & Community, 2(4), 277–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hanlon, B., Short, J. R., & Vicino, T. J. (2009). Cities and suburbs. New metropolitan realities in the US. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Hanson, S., & Pratt, G. (Eds.). (1995). Gender, work and space. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Harris, R., & Larkham, P. J. (Eds.). (1999). Changing suburbs: Foundation, form and function. London: Spon.Google Scholar
  33. Hummon, D. M. (1990). Commonplaces. Community ideology and identity in American culture. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  34. Jarvis, H., Pratt, A. C., & Wu, P. (2001). The secret life of cities. The social reproduction of everyday life. Harlow: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  35. Karsten, L. (2003). Family gentrifiers: Challenging the city as a place simultaneously to build a career and to raise children. Urban Studies, 40(12), 2573–2585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Karsten, L. (2007). Housing as a way of life. Towards an understanding of middle-class families’ preference for an urban residential location. Housing Studies, 22(1), 83–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Low, S. (2003). Behind the gates. Life, security and the pursuit of happiness in fortress America. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  38. Lupi, T., de Stigter-Speksnijder, M., Karsten, L., Musterd, S., & Deben, L. (2007). Leven in de buurt. Territoriale binding in drie Vinex-wijken. Amsterdam: Aksant.Google Scholar
  39. Lupi, T., & Musterd, S. (2006). The suburban ‘community question’. Urban Studies, 43(4), 801–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Maher, K. H. (2003). Workers and strangers: The household service economy and the landscape of suburban fear. Urban Affairs Review, 38(6), 751–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. McDowell, L. (1983). Towards an understanding of the gender division of urban space. Environment and Planning, Part D, 1(1), 59–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. McGuirk, P., & Dowling, R. (2009). Neoliberal privatisation? Remapping the public and the private in Sidney’s masterplanned residential estates. Political Geography, 28, 170–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. McGuirk, P., & Dowling, R. (2011). Governing social reproduction in masterplanned estates: Urban politics and everyday life in Sidney. Urban Studies, 48(12), 2611–2628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. McKenzie, E. (1994). Privatopia. Homeowners associations and the rise of residential private government. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Modarres, A., & Kirby, A. (2010). The suburban question: Notes for a research program. Cities, 27(2), 114–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Phelps, N. A., Parsons, N., Ballas, D., & Dowling, A. (2006). Post-suburban Europe. Planning and politics at the margins of Europe’s capital cities. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  47. Polanska, D. V. (2010). The emergence of gated communities in post-communist urban context and the reasons for their increasing popularity. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 25(3), 295–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  49. Richards, L. (1990). Nobody’s home. Dreams and realities in a new suburb. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Rosenblatt, T., Cheshire, L., & Lawrence, G. (2009). Social interaction and sense of community in a master planned community. Housing, Theory and Society, 26(2), 122–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Savage, M. (2010). The politics of elective belonging. Housing, Theory and Society, 27(2), 115–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Savage, M., Bagnall, G., & Longhurst, B. (2005). Globalization and belonging. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  53. SCP. (2005). Kinderen in Nederland. Den Haag: SCP.Google Scholar
  54. Strong-Boag, V., Dyck, I., England, K., & Johnson, L. (1999). What women’s spaces? In R. Harris & P. J. Larkham (Eds.), Changing suburbs: Foundation, form and function (pp. 168–177). London: Spon.Google Scholar
  55. Völker, B., & Flap, H. (2007). 16 million neighbors. A multilevel study of the role of neighbors in the personal networks of the Dutch. Urban Affairs Review, 43(2), 256–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. VROM. (1990). Vierde Nota over de Ruimtelijke Ordening Extra (VINEX). Den Haag: Ministerie van Volkshuisvesting en Ruimtelijke Ordening.Google Scholar
  57. Watt, P. (2007). From the dirty city to the spoiled suburbs. In B. Campkin & R. Cox (Eds.), Dirt: New geographies of cleanliness and contamination (pp. 80–91). London: IB Tauris.Google Scholar
  58. Watt, P. (2009). Living in an oasis: Middle-class disaffiliation and selective belonging in an English suburb. Environment and Planning A, 41(12), 2874–2892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wellman, B. (1978). The community question: Intimate networks of East Yorkers. American Journal of Sociology, 84(1), 1201–1231.Google Scholar
  60. Willmott, P., & Young, M. (1967). Family and class in a London suburb. London: New English Library.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lia Karsten
    • 1
  • Tineke Lupi
    • 1
  • Marlies de Stigter-Speksnijder
    • 1
  1. 1.AISSR/Urban GeographiesUniversity of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations