Modes of housing production in developing countries: the contemporary role of land, labour, and capital in Lagos, Nigeria

  • Muyiwa Agunbiade
  • Abbas Rajabifard
  • Rohan Bennett
Policy and Practice


The strategies of participants in housing production, in developing countries, are diverse and not fully understood. Governments in most developing countries have not been able to, sufficiently, explore how the production factors: land, labour and capital, impact on housing production. As a result, many policies formulated by governments aimed at stimulating housing production are found to result in unintended outcomes: they do not always align with the way housing is actually created. This study uses the production factors to assess how motivations are shaped and different modes of housing production result. The aim is to gain an improved understanding of how housing developers, builders and government, impact modes of production. The method includes synthesis of past studies on factors of housing production in Lagos. In parallel, it also involves visits and interviews with some selected developers and agencies to allow a deeper engagement with their activities. This is in addition to direct observation and interviews undertaken through purposeful selection of some autonomous (on-site) builders. As an exploratory study, it observes that a better approach to land supply is significantly beneficial in shaping the modes and capacity of housing. The study helps understand the strategies of participants in housing production in developing countries, especially in Lagos. It recommends that efficient land supply to the autonomous on-site builders should be a focus for policy makers. This will contribute to the production of more housing thereby facilitating an improved production of present and future housing needs of the population.


Land Labour Capital Developers Profit Owner occupier Housing production 


  1. Adams, C. D. (2005). Urban planning and the development process. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Adeola, B. (2006). Imperatives for mass housing in Lagos StateThe LSDPC medium income housing approach. Paper presented at the 2000 annual conference and AGM of the association of consulting engineers, Nigeria (ACEN).Google Scholar
  3. Adeola, B. (2008). Our collective responsibility: Ogun State. Regional development strategy. Lagos: Comprehensive Project Management Services.Google Scholar
  4. Agbola, T. (1988). The housing construction process in Nigeria: Implications for urban growth and development. Cities, 5(2), 184–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Agbola, T. (1990). Affordability and cost recovery in shelter projects: The case of Nigeria. Third World Planning Review, 12(1), 59–73.Google Scholar
  6. Ahmad, A. M. (1989). Housing submarkets for the urban poor—The case of Greater Khartoum, the Sudan. Environment and Urbanization, 1(2), 50–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Aina, T. A. (1988). The construction of housing for the urban poor of Lagos. Habitat International, 12(1), 31–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Baken, R. J., & Van der Linden, J. (1993). ‘Getting the Incentives Right’: Banking on the formal private sector (HIS Working Paper Series No. 5).Google Scholar
  9. Baker, K. (2003). Review of housing supply interim report—Analysis. Retrieved from
  10. Bryman, A. (2004). Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Egbu, A. U., Olomolaiye, P., & Gameson, R. (2008). A neo-institutional economic critique of the system for allocating urban land and development rights in Nigeria. Habitat International, 32(1), 121–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hamdi, N. (1995). Housing without houses: Participation, flexibility, enablement. Intermediate Technology Publications.Google Scholar
  13. Ikejiofor, U. (1997). The private sector and urban housing production process in Nigeria: A study of small-scale landlords in Abuja. Habitat International, 21(4), 409–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Israel, A. (1990). The changing role of the state: Institutional dimensions. Washington: World Bank.Google Scholar
  15. Keivani, R., & Wernab, E. (2001). Modes of housing provision in developing countries. Progress in Planning, 55, 65–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lagos State Government. (2006). Lagos state regional plan review. Lagos: Ministry of Physical Planning and Urban Development.Google Scholar
  17. Mathema, A. (2008). Slums and sprawl in Lagos: The unintended consequence of ‘Well-Intended’ regulation.Google Scholar
  18. Ogu, V. I., & Ogbuozobe, J. E. (2001). Housing policy in Nigeria: Towards enablement of private housing development. Habitat International, 25(2001), 473–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Okpala, D. C., Aniekwu, A. N. (1988). Causes of high costs of construction in Nigeria. Journal of Construction Engineering, 114(2), 233–244.Google Scholar
  20. Olokesusi, O., & Okufolure, A. (Eds.). (2001). An overview of factors influencing the pace of building starts in Nigeria. A Publication of Federal Ministry of Works & Housing and NISER-2001.Google Scholar
  21. Olumide, O., & Adelore, C. (2005). New concepts for sustainable housing delivery. University of Lagos. Retrieved from$.
  22. Omirin, M., & Antwi, A. (2004). Informality, illegality and market inefficiency: A case for land market deregulation in Accra and Lagos. Retrieved from
  23. Omirin, M. M., & Nubi, T. G. (2007). Role of primary mortgage institutions in housing delivery. The Housing Finance International, 22(1), 52–56.Google Scholar
  24. Onibokun, A. G. (1983). Issues in Nigerian housing. Ibadan: NISER.Google Scholar
  25. Onibokun, A. G. (2003). The problem of housing construction in Nigeria. Ibadan: University of Ibadan Press.Google Scholar
  26. Pugh, C. (1994). Housing policy development in developing countries: The World Bank and internationalization 1972–93. Cities, 11(1), 159–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Turner, J. C., & Fichter, R. (Eds.). (1972). Freedom to build. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  28. Udegbe, M. I. (2005). Labour force output on plastering activities in Edo State. The professional builders. Journal of the Nigerian Institute of Builders, 1(7), 34–41.Google Scholar
  29. UNCHS. (1991). Assessment of experience with the project approach to shelter delivery for the poor United Nations Centre for human settlements Habitat.Google Scholar
  30. UN-HABITAT. (2003). The challenge of slums—Global report on human settlements 2003. London, Sterling, VA: Earthscan Publications.Google Scholar
  31. UN-HABITAT. (2010). A practical guide for conducting: Housing profiles-supporting evidence-based housing policy and reform UNON. Nairobi: Publishing Services Section.Google Scholar
  32. Walley, S. (2008). Nigeria financial system strategy 2020: Housing finance; strengthening financial sectors. First Initiative.Google Scholar
  33. Wood, G., & Ong, R. (2010). Western Australia Research Centre factors shaping the decision to become a landlord and retain rental investments for the Australian AHURI Final Report No. 142. Retrieved from
  34. World Bank. (1988). World development report 1988. New York: Oxford University Press for the World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. World Bank. (1993). Housing: Enabling markets to work. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  36. Yeboah, I. E. (2005). Housing the urban poor in twenty-first century Sub-Saharan Africa: Policy mismatch and a way forward for Ghana. GeoJournal, 62, 147–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Muyiwa Agunbiade
    • 1
  • Abbas Rajabifard
    • 1
  • Rohan Bennett
    • 2
  1. 1.University of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.The University of TwenteEnschedeThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations