Advertisement

Impact of past and future residential housing development patterns on energy demand and related emissions

  • R. J. FullerEmail author
  • R. H. Crawford
Article

Abstract

The continued outward growth from a central business district has been the dominant characteristic of most cities in Australia. However, this feature is seen as unsustainable and alternative scenarios to contain the outward growth are being proposed. Melbourne is currently grappling with this issue while simultaneously trying to reduce per capita greenhouse gas emissions. Housing size, style and its location are the three principal factors which determine the emissions from the residential sector. This paper describes a methodology to assess the combined impact of these factors on past and possible future forms of residential development in Melbourne. The analysis found that the location of the housing and its size are the dominant factors determining energy use and greenhouse gas emissions.

Keywords

Greenhouse gas emissions House size Style and location Urban growth 

References

  1. ABS. (2007a). Table 1, Housing—national summary, Cat. No. 4102, Australian social trends, data cube. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics.Google Scholar
  2. ABS. (2007b). 9309.0—Motor vehicle census Australia, 31 March. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics.Google Scholar
  3. ABS. (2008). Feature article: Average floor area of new residential dwellings. 8731.0—Building Approvals, February. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics.Google Scholar
  4. AGO. (1999). Australian Residential Building Sector Greenhouse Gas Emissions 1990–2010. Final Report. Canberra: Australian Greenhouse Office.Google Scholar
  5. AGO. (2006). Factors and methods workbook. Canberra: Department of the Environment and Heritage.Google Scholar
  6. BITRE. (2009). Greenhouse gas emissions from Australian transport: projections to 2020, Working Paper 73. Canberra: Bureau of Infrastructure, Transport and Regional Economics.Google Scholar
  7. Casler, S. (1983). Correcting input-output coefficients for capital depreciation. Energy Systems and Policy, 7(3), 171–193.Google Scholar
  8. Crawford, R. H., Treloar, G. J., Fuller, R. J., & Bazilian, M. (2006). Life-cycle energy analysis of building integrated photovoltaic systems (BiPVs) with heat recovery unit. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 10(6), 559–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Davison, G., & Dingle, T. (1995). Introduction: The view from the Ming Wing. In G. Davison, T. Dingle, & S. O’Hanlon (Eds.), The cream brick frontier—Histories of Australian suburbia (pp. 2–17). Clayton, Victoria: Monash University.Google Scholar
  10. Davison, G., & Yelland, S. (2004). Car wars: How the car won our hearts and conquered our cities. Crows Nest, NSW: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  11. DEWHA. (2008). Energy use in the Australian residential sector 1986–2020. Canberra: Department of Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts.Google Scholar
  12. DHS. (2007). K2 Apartments. Setting new standard in medium density public housing. Technical Report. Melbourne: Victorian Government, Dept. of Human Services, Office of Housing.Google Scholar
  13. Dingle, T. (1995). People and places in post-war Melbourne. In Davison, G., Dingle, T., & O’Hanlon, S. (Eds.), op. cit. (pp. 27–40).Google Scholar
  14. DNRE. (1999). Victorian greenhouse gas inventory. Melbourne: Victorian Government, Department of Natural Resource and Environment.Google Scholar
  15. DOI. (2002). Melbourne 2030. Planning for sustainable growth. Melbourne: Victorian Government, Department of Infrastructure.Google Scholar
  16. EEA. (2000). Are we moving in the right direction? Indicators of transport and environment integration in the EU. Environmental Issues Series No 12. Copenhagen: European Environment Agency.Google Scholar
  17. Fay, R. (1999). Comparative life cycle energy studies of typical Australian suburban dwellings. PhD Thesis. Australia: University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
  18. Freeland, J. M. (1970). Architecture in Australia—A history. Melbourne: Australia Cheshire Books.Google Scholar
  19. Fuller, R., & Treloar, G. (2004). The influence of housing size, style and location on energy and greenhouse gas emissions. Paper presented at 42nd Annual Conference of the Australian and New Zealand Solar Energy Society, Perth.Google Scholar
  20. Fyfe, M., & Sexton, R. (2008). Trains just as packed despite extra services. The Sunday Age Newspaper, August 17th, p. 3.Google Scholar
  21. Garden, D. (1995). Type 15, Glengarry and Catilina: The Changing Space of the A.V. Jennings home in the 1960s. In Davison, G., Dingle, T., & O’Hanlon, S. (Eds.), op. cit. (pp. 140–153).Google Scholar
  22. Garnaut, R. (2008). Garnaut climate change review. Executive summary. Interim Report to the Commonwealth, State and Territory Governments of Australia. February.Google Scholar
  23. Jonsson, D. K. (2007). Indirect energy associated with Swedish road transport. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 7(3), 183–200.Google Scholar
  24. Leach, S. J. (1982). Energy conservation in housing. Housing Science, 6(2), 177–193.Google Scholar
  25. Lenzen, M. (1999). Total requirements of energy and greenhouse gases for Australian transport. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 4(4), 265–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lenzen, M. (2001). A generalized input-output multiplier calculus for Australia. Economic Systems Research, 13(1), 65–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mees, P. (2000). A very public solution. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Melbourne Docklands. (2006). Ecological Sustainable Development Guide. Melbourne Docklands, VicUrban.Google Scholar
  29. Newman, P. (2006). Transport greenhouse gas and Australian suburbs. What planners can do? Australian Planner, 43(2), 6–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Treloar, G. J. (1997). Extracting embodied energy paths from input-output tables: towards an input-output based hybrid energy analysis method. Economic Systems Research, 9(4), 375–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Treloar, G. J. (2007). Environmental assessment using both financial and physical quantities. Paper presented at the 41st Annual Conference of the Architectural Science Association, Geelong, Victoria.Google Scholar
  32. Treloar, G., Fay, R., Love, P. E. D., & Iyer-Raniga, U. (2000). Analysing the life-cycle energy of an Australian residential building and its householders. Building Research and Information, 28(3), 184–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Treloar, G. J., Love, P. E. D., & Holt, G. (2001). Using national input-output data for embodied energy analysis of individual residential buildings. Construction Management and Economics, 19, 49–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Turton, H. (2004). Greenhouse gas emissions in industrialised countries: where does Australia stand? Discussion Paper No 66. Canberra: The Australia Institute.Google Scholar
  35. Wright, A. (2008). What is the relationship between built form and energy use in dwellings? Energy Policy, 36(12), 4544–4547.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Architecture and BuildingDeakin UniversityGeelongAustralia
  2. 2.Faculty of Architecture, Building and PlanningThe University of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations