(Un)accommodating disabilities: housing, marginalization and dependency in Australia

Original Paper

Abstract

This paper examines the ways in which a lack of adequate housing and welfare provision for people with different kinds and degrees of disabilities reinforces their marginalization and dependency on carers, support agencies and the State. This paper argues that even though most people have to rely on others for help and assistance at some point in their lives, the ways in which dependency and disability are socially constructed reproduce the marginalization of people with disabilities. Drawing on findings from qualitative research with people with disabilities and family carers in urban and regional Victoria, Australia, this article explores how this lack of adequate housing and welfare provision reinforces the dependency of people with disabilities through low incomes, unsuitable housing design and poor housing conditions, restrictions in terms of location and place, and the lack of suitable care and assistance.

Keywords

Disability Housing Dependency 

References

  1. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). (2005). Australia’s welfare 2005. Canberra: AIHW.Google Scholar
  2. Barnes, C. (1991). Disabled people in Britain and discrimination: A case for anti-discrimination legislation. London: Hurst.Google Scholar
  3. Barnes, C., & Mercer, G. (Eds.). (1996). Exploring the divide: Illness and disability. Leeds: Disability Press.Google Scholar
  4. Beer, A., Faulkner, D., & Gabriel, M. (2006) 21st century housing careers and Australia’s housing future: Literature review. National research venture 2, research paper 1. Melbourne: Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute.Google Scholar
  5. Bleasdale, M. (2007). Supporting the housing of people with complex housing needs. Final report. Melbourne: Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute.Google Scholar
  6. Bostock, L., & Gleeson, B. (2004). Contested housing landscapes? Social inclusion, deinstitutionalisation and housing policy in Australia. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 39(1), 41–62.Google Scholar
  7. Bostock, L., Gleeson, B., McPherson, A., & Pang, L. (2000). Deinstitutionalisation and housing futures: Positioning paper. Melbourne: University of New South Wales and University of Western Sydney Research Centre, Australian Housing and Research Institute.Google Scholar
  8. Bostock, L., Gleeson, B., McPherson, A., & Pang L. (2001). Deinstitutionalisation and housing futures: Final report. Melbourne: University of New South Wales and University of Western Sydney Research Centre, Australian Housing and Research Institute.Google Scholar
  9. Bridge, C., Kendig, H., Quine, S., & Parsons, A. (2002). Housing and care for younger and older adults with disabilities. Final report. Melbourne: Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute.Google Scholar
  10. Casas, I. (2007). Social exclusion and the disabled: An accessibility approach. Professional Geographer, 59(4), 463–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clarke, P., & George, L. (2005). The role of the built environment in the disablement process. American Journal of Public Health, 95(11), 1933–1939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. COAG Reform Council. (2010). National Disability Agreement: Baseline Performance Report for 2008-09. Report to the council of Australian governments. Canberra: Council of Australian Government Reform Council.Google Scholar
  13. Crow, L. (1996). ‘Including all of our lives: Renewing the social model of disability. In J. Morris (Ed.), Encounter with strangers: Feminism and disability (pp. 206–226). London: Women’s Press.Google Scholar
  14. Friedman, M. (1985). Care and context in moral reasoning. In C. Harding (Ed.), Moral dilemmas: Philosophical and psychological issues in the development of moral reasoning (pp. 25–42). Chicago: Precedent.Google Scholar
  15. Friedman, M. (1993). Beyond caring: The de-moralization of gender. In M. J. Larrabee (Ed.), An ethic of care: Feminist and interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 258–273). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Harrison, M. (2004). Defining housing quality and environment: Disability, standards and social factors. Housing Studies, 19(5), 691–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Harrison, M., & Davis, C. (2001). Housing, social policy and difference: Disability, ethnicity, gender and housing. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  19. Heywood, F. (2005). Adaptation: Altering the house to restore the home. Housing Studies, 20(4), 531–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Imrie, R. (2004). Housing quality, disability and domesticity. Housing Studies, 19(5), 685–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Imrie, R., & Hall, P. (2001). An exploration of disability and the development process. Urban Studies, 38(2), 333–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Keith, L., & Morris, J. (1995). Easy targets: A disability rights perspective on the “children as carers” debate. Critical Social Policy, 44(5), 36–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lloyd, M. (2001). The politics of disability and feminism: Discord or synthesis. Sociology, 35(3), 715–728.Google Scholar
  24. Maddison, F. (1998). Disability, institutional reform and de-institutionalisation: The queensland experience. Unpublished MA thesis, Department of Anthropology and Sociology, University of Queensland.Google Scholar
  25. Oliver, M. (1990). The politics of disablement. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  26. Parr, H., & Butler, R. (1999). New geographies of illness, impairment and disability. In H. Parr & R. Butler (Eds.), Mind and body spaces: Geographies of illness, impairment and disability (pp. 1–23). London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  27. Quibell, R. (2004). The living history project: The lived experiences of people with disability and parents of people with a disability in the period 19812002. Scope Vic Ltd.Google Scholar
  28. Saugeres, L. (2008). 21st century housing careers of people with a disability and carers: A qualitative study. National research venture 2. AHURI Southern Research Centre: Adelaide.Google Scholar
  29. Saunders, P. (2005). ‘The impact of disability on poverty and living standards’, paper presented to Australian social policy conference. Sydney: University of New South Wales, 20–22 July.Google Scholar
  30. Sevenhuijsen, S. (1998). Citizenship and the ethics of care: Feminist considerations on justice, morality and politics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Shakespeare, T. (2000). Help. Newcastle: Venture Press.Google Scholar
  32. Victorian Auditor-General. (2008). Accommodation for people with disability. Melbourne: Victorian Government.Google Scholar
  33. Victorian Government. (2010). Practical and accessible homes for all Victorians. Melbourne: Build For Life, Victorian Government.Google Scholar
  34. Wiesel, I., & Fincher, R. (2009). The choice agenda in disability housing provision. Housing Studies, 24(5), 611–627.Google Scholar
  35. Young, I. M. (2000). Five faces of oppression. In M. Adams, W. J. Blumenfeld, R. Castaneda, H. W. Hackman, M. L. Peters, & X. Zuniga (Eds.), Readings for diversity and social justice: An anthology on racism, sexism, anti-semitism, heterosexism, classism, and ableism (pp. 35–49). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Social ResearchSwinburne University of TechnologyHawthornAustralia

Personalised recommendations