Community engagement in regeneration: are we getting the point?

Article

Abstract

This paper starts by identifying the intended benefits of community engagement in regeneration according to policy theory. It then adds to the evidence base by assessing to what extent these aims are being achieved through community engagement in the latest cycle of area regeneration in the city of Glasgow. It is based on a qualitative study of residents’ experiences and perceptions of the regeneration planning process in three neighbourhoods undergoing major regeneration. Up to the period beyond regeneration planning, and into the early stages of implementation, community engagement had made contributions to some of the identified aims. However, there were weaknesses in relation to community empowerment beyond regeneration, community cohesion and effective implementation in particular. A series of recommendations are made; of particular importance is the necessity to maintain community engagement throughout the regeneration process, between planning and implementation, in order to ensure that any benefits are sustained.

Keywords

Community cohesion Community engagement Empowerment Governance Regeneration Sustainable communities Urban policy 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank all those who participated in this study.

References

  1. Atkinson, R. (1999). Discourses of partnership and empowerment in contemporary British urban regeneration. Urban Studies, 36(1), 59–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barnes, M., Newman, J., Knops, A., & Sullivan, H. (2003). Constituting ‘the public’ in public participation. Public Administration, 81(2), 379–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bergland, A., & Kirkevold, M. (2001). Thriving—a useful theoretical perspective to capture the experience of well-being among frail elderly in nursing homes? Journal of Advanced Nursing, 36(3), 426–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blake, G., et al. (2008). Community engagement and community cohesion. New York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.Google Scholar
  5. Burns, D., & Taylor, M. (2000). Auditing community participation: An assessment handbook. Bristol/New York: The Policy Press/JRF.Google Scholar
  6. Burton, P. (2003). Community involvement in neighbourhood regeneration: Stairway to heaven or road to nowhere? CNR Paper 13. Glasgow and Bristol: Centre for Neighbourhood Research.Google Scholar
  7. Burton, P., Goodlad, R., Abbott, J., Croft, J., Hastings, A., Macdonald, G., & Slater, T. (2004). What works in community involvement in area-based initiatives? A systematic review of the literature. London: The Home Office. Available at: http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/pdfs04/rdsolr5304.pdf.
  8. Communities Scotland. (2007). National standards for community engagement: Users’ guide. Edinburgh: Communities Scotland. Available at: http://www.scdc.org.uk/uploads/standards_booklet.pdf.
  9. DETR (Department of the Environment, Transport, the Regions). (2001). Local strategic partnerships. Government guidance summary. London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  10. Dinham, A. (2005). Empowered or over-powered? The real experiences of local participation in the UK’s new deal for communities. Community Development Journal, 40(3), 301–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dinham, A. (2006). Raising expectations or dashing hopes? Well-being and participation in disadvantaged areas. Community Development Journal, 42(2), 181–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Docherty, I., Goodlad, R., & Paddison, R. (2001). Civic culture, community and citizen participation in contrasting neighbourhoods. Urban Studies, 38, 2225–2250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Egan, J. (2004). The Egan review: Skills for sustainable communities. London: Communities and Local Government.Google Scholar
  14. Flint, J. (2003). Housing and ethopolitics: Constructing identities of active consumption and responsible community. Economy and Society, 32(3), 611–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Glasgow Housing Association Ltd. (2005/2007). Tenant participation strategy. Retrieved at http://www.gha.org.uk/content/mediaassets/doc/GHA_TPS2005.pdf.
  16. Glasgow Housing Association Ltd. (2006). Sustainability strategy (p. 16). Glasgow: GHA.Google Scholar
  17. Jones, P. (2003). Urban regeneration’s poisoned chalice: Is there an impasse in (community) participation-based policy? Urban Studies, 40(3), 581–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kearns, A., & Turok, I. (2004). Sustainable communities: Dimensions and challenges. ESRC/Office of the Deputy Prime Minister Postgraduate Research Programme Working Paper 1, Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, London.Google Scholar
  19. Lister, S., Perry, J., & Thornley, M. (2007). Community engagement in housing-led regeneration: A good practice guide. Coventry: Chartered Institute of Housing.Google Scholar
  20. Maddock, S. (2005). The leadership role of women in social regeneration in the UK. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 18(2), 128–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. National Audit Office. (2004). Getting citizens involved: Community participation in neighbourhood renewal. London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  22. Robinson, F., Shaw, F., & Davidson, G. (2005). ‘On the side of the angels’: Community involvement in the governance of neighbourhood renewal. Local Economy, 20(1), 13–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rogers, B., & Robinson, E. (2004). The benefits of community engagement: A review of the evidence. London: Home Office Active Citizenship Centre.Google Scholar
  24. Scottish Executive. (2006). People and place: Regeneration policy statement. Available at: http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2006/02/24092959/0.
  25. Social Exclusion Unit. (1998). Bringing Britain together: A national strategy for neighbourhood renewal. London: Cm4045 Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  26. Tam, H. (2004). Foreword. In B. Rogers & E. Robinson (Eds.), The benefits of community engagement: A review of the evidence (Vol. 1). London: Home Office Active Citizenship Centre.Google Scholar
  27. Taylor, M. (2000). Maintaining community involvement in regeneration: What are the issues? Local Economy, 15(3), 251–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Taylor, M. (2003). Public policy in the community. The challenge for communities (Chap. 11). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  29. Taylor, M., Wilson, M., Purdue, D., & Wilde, P. (2007). Changing neighbourhoods: Lessons from the JRF neighbourhood programme. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  30. Waddington, D. (2003). ‘Making the difference’ in Warsop Vale: The impact of government regeneration policy and community development on a Nottinghamshire ex-mining community. Social Policy and Society, 3(1), 21–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. White, S. (1996). Depoliticising development: The uses and abuses of participation. Development in Practice, 6(1), 6–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. White, S., & Pettit, J. (2004). Participatory approaches and the measurement of human well-being. UN University/World Institute for Development Economics Research (WIDER) 2004/57, New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Urban StudiesUniversity of GlasgowGlasgowUK

Personalised recommendations