The Nutrition Benefits Participation Gap: Barriers to Uptake of SNAP and WIC Among Latinx American Immigrant Families
To examine nutrition benefit under-enrollment in Latinx American immigrant families, we administered a survey to 100 adults attending a NY Latinx American community serving organization. We used a logistic regression approach to analyze misinformation impact on enrollment, and examined non-enrollment explanations, among participants in whose families a child or pregnant or breastfeeding woman appeared SNAP- or WIC-eligible. Among households (N = 51) with ≥ 1 SNAP-eligible child, 49% had no child enrolled. Reasons included repercussion fears (e.g. payback obligation, military conscription, college aid ineligibility, child removal, non-citizen family member penalties), and logistical barriers. In multivariable regression models, having heard the rumor that SNAP/WIC participation makes unauthorized status family members vulnerable to being reported to the government was associated with an 85% lower enrollment rate (OR 0.15, CI 0.03, 0.94). Misinformation impedes nutrition benefit participation. A multi-level intervention is necessary to inform potential applicants and providers regarding eligibility criteria and erroneous rumors, along with an informed discussion of the risks versus benefits of using resources, especially as public charge criteria change.
KeywordsSNAP WIC Public charge Nutrition Immigration
The authors would like to thank Sonya J. Smyk, Memorial Sloan Kettering, for editorial support. She was not compensated beyond her regular salary.
This study received funding from the National Institutes of Health (Grant Nos. P30 CA008748; U54 CA137788; T32 CA009461).
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors report no relevant conflicts of interest.
- 3.US Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service. (2019). Key statistics and graphs. Retrieved August 21, 2019, from https://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/food-nutrition-assistance/food-security-in-the-us/key-statistics-graphics/#householdtype.
- 4.Cook, J. T., Frank, D. A., Levenson, S. M., Neault, N. B., Heeren, T. C., Black, M. M., et al. (2006). Child food insecurity increases risks posed by household food insecurity to young children’s health. Journal of Nutrition, 136(4), 1073–1076. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/136.4.1073.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 6.US Citizenship and Immigration Services (April 29, 2011). Public charge fact sheet. Retrieved April 2, 2016, from https://www.uscis.gov/news/fact-sheets/public-charge-fact-sheet.
- 7.US Citizenship and Immigration Services. (2019). Inadmissibility on public charge grounds. A rule by the Homeland Security Department on 08/14/2019. Federal Register. 8 CFR Parts 103, 212, 213, 214, 245 and 248. Retrieved August 30, 2019, from https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2019/08/14/2019-17142/inadmissibility-on-public-charge-grounds.
- 8.US Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Services. (2016). Women, Infants and Children (WIC): WIC eligibility requirements. Retrieved March 14, 2017, from https://www.fns.usda.gov/wic/wic-eligibility-requirements.
- 10.Cato Institute. (2013). The use of public assistance benefits by citizens and non-citizen immigrants in the United States. Washington, DC: Ku, L., & Bruen, B.Google Scholar
- 11.Urban Institute. (1999). Trends in noncitizens’ and citizens’ use of public benefits following Welfare Reform: 1994-97. Washington, DC: Fix, M. & Passel, J. S.Google Scholar