Advertisement

Journal of Community Health

, Volume 45, Issue 1, pp 88–97 | Cite as

Community Health Advisors' Characteristics and Behaviors, Role Performance, and Volunteer Satisfaction in a Church-Based Healthy Eating and Physical Activity Intervention

  • Patricia A. SharpeEmail author
  • Sara Wilcox
  • Jessica Stucker
  • Deborah Kinnard
  • John Bernhart
  • Katherine L. James
Original Paper

Abstract

Community Health Advisors (CHAs) contribute to health promotion program effectiveness, but their role in faith-based programs is understudied, and little is known about their role performance or satisfaction. In a dissemination and implementation study, 19 CHAs were trained to provide healthy eating (HE) and physical activity (PA) program training to church committees. Of these, 17 CHAs trained 347 attendees from 115 churches. Thirteen CHAs remained for the 12-month period and provided telephone-based technical assistance (TA) to churches. To evaluate their experiences and satisfaction, CHAs completed questionnaires at baseline and 12 months. Staff observers and church committee members evaluated CHAs’ effectiveness as trainers. There were no significant changes in the CHAs’ own body mass index, PA, fruit and vegetable intake, or self-rated health but significant increases in their perceived knowledge of PA (p = 0.01) and HE (p = 0.02). CHAs reported high agreement regarding the quality of their training for the role and moderate volunteer satisfaction on average but thought that the time required of them was somewhat more than expected, though they were interested in volunteering for a future, similar role. Church committee members agreed with CHAs’ effectiveness as trainers and the helpfulness of the TA calls. Staff observers rated CHAs’ as having covered 87.8% of church training content and agreed that, on average, the CHAs were effective trainers. Assessing CHAs’ availability, clear communication about the time requirements, and over-recruitment to offset attrition and decrease the workload may be needed to improve retention and support satisfaction.

Keywords

Community Health Advisors Faith-based Dissemination and implementation Physical activity Healthy eating 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion by Cooperative Agreement Number U48-DP-005000. The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention or the Department of Health and Human Services. The authors thank the South Carolina Conference of the United Methodist Church for their partnership and contributions to this research. The authors also appreciate the contributions of the faculty, staff, and students of the University of South Carolina Prevention Research Center.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

The University’s Institutional Review Board reviewed the faith-based healthy eating and exercise study and granted exempt status.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

The Institutional Review Board did not require written informed consent. Completion of questionnaires and interviews for program evaluation was voluntary. Verbal consent was documented, and interviewers provided participants a copy of the consent document.

References

  1. 1.
    Tabak, R. G., Khoong, E. C., Chambers, D., & Brownson, R. C. (2012). Bridging research and practice: Models for dissemination and implementation research. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 43(3), 337–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wilcox, S., Laken, M., Parrott, A. W., Condrasky, M., Saunders, R., Addy, C. L., et al. (2010). The Faith, Activity, and Nutrition (FAN) program: Design of a participatory research intervention to increase physical activity and improve dietary habits in African American churches. Contemporary Clincial Trials, 31, 323–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wilcox, S., Parrott, A., Baruth, M., Laken, M., Condrasky, M., Saunders, R., et al. (2013). The Faith, Activity, and Nutrition program: A randomized controlled trial in African-American churches. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 44, 122–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wilcox, S., Saunders, R. P., Kaczynski, A. T., Forthofer, M., Sharpe, P. A., Goodwin, C., et al. (2018). A randomized dissemination and implementation study of the Faith, Activity, and Nutrition program: Countywide adoption, reach, and effectiveness. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 54(6), 776–785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Koch, E. (2000). Summary of the National Community Health Advisor Study, 1998: A Policy Research Project of The University of Arizona. Summary by the Harrison Institute for Public Law, Georgetown University Lay Center. Washington, DC: Annie E. Casey Foundation. Retrieved March 4, 2019, from https://crh.arizona.edu/sites/default/files/pdf/publications/CAHsummaryALL.pdf.
  6. 6.
    Fleury, J., Keller, C., Perez, A., & Lee, S. M. (2009). The role of lay health advisors in cardiovascular risk reduction: A review. American Journal of Community Psychology, 44, 28–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Alcalay, R., Alvarado, M., Balcazar, H., Newman, E., & Huerta, E. (1999). Salud para su Corazon: A community-based Latino cardiovascular disease prevention and outreach model. Journal of Community Health, 24(5), 359–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cornell, C. E., Littleton, M. A., Greene, P. G., Pulley, L., Brownstein, J. N., Sanderson, B. K., et al. (2009). A community health advisor program to reduce cardiovascular risk among rural African-American women. Health Education Research, 24(4), 622–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hilfinger Messias, D. K., Parra-Medina, D., Sharpe, P. A., Treviño, L., Koskan, A. M., & Morales-Campos, D. (2013). Promotoras de Salud: Roles, responsibilities, and contributions in a multisite community-based randomized controlled trial. Hispanic Health Care International, 11(2), 62–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kim, S., Koniak-Griffin, D., Flaskerud, J. H., & Guarnero, P. A. (2004). The impact of lay health advisors on cardiovascular health promotion using a community-based participatory approach. Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 19(3), 192–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Navarro, A. M., Rock, C. L., McNicholas, L. J., Senn, K. L., & Moreno, C. (2000). Community-based education in nutrition and cancer: The Por La Vida Cuidandome curriculum. Journal of Cancer Education, 15, 168–172.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hunt, C. W., Grant, J. S., & Appel, S. J. (2011). An integrative review of community health advisors in Type 2 diabetes. Journal of Community Health, 36, 883–893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Community Preventive Services Task Force. Finding and Rational Statement. Ratified March 2015. Cardiovascular disease prevention and control: Interventions engaging community health workers. Retrieved March 4, 2019, from www.thecommunityguide.org/sites/default/files/assets/CVD-Community-Health-Workers_0.pdf.
  14. 14.
    Community Preventive Services Task Force. Finding and Rational Statement. Ratified August 2016. Diabetes prevention: Interventions engaging community health workers. Retrieved March 4, 2019, from www.thecommunityguide.org/sites/default/files/assets/Diabetes-Prevention-Community-Health-Workers.pdf.
  15. 15.
    Sharpe, P. A., Wilcox, S., Kinnard, D., Condrasky, M. D. (2018). Community health advisors' participation in a dissemination and implementation study of an evidence-based physical activity and healthy eating program in a faith-based setting. Journal of Community Health, 43(4), 694–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Resnicow, K., Jackson, A., Wang, T., De, A. K., McCarty, F., Dudley, W. N., et al. (2001). A motivational interviewing intervention to increase fruit and vegetable intake through Black churches: Results of the Eat for Life trial. American Journal of Public Health, 91(10), 1686–1693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Resnicow, K., Campbell, M. K., Carr, C., McCarty, F., Wang, T., Periasamy, S., et al. (2004). Body and soul. A dietary intervention conducted through African-American churches. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 27(2), 97–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2009 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Survey Questionnaire. Retrieved April 4, 2019, from www.cdc.gov/brfss/questionnaires/pdf-ques/2009brfss.pdf.
  19. 19.
    Galindo-Kuhn, R., & Guzley, R. M. (2001). The Volunteer Satisfaction Index: Construct definition, measurement, development, and validation. Journal of Social Service Research, 28(1), 45–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    US Department of Health and Human Services. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Assessing your weight and health risk. Retrieved March 1, 2019, from https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health/educational/lose_wt/risk.htm.
  21. 21.
    Lorig, K. R., Hurwicz, M. L., Sobel, D., Hobbs, M., & Ritter, P. L. (2005). A national dissemination of an evidence-based self-management program: A process evaluation study. Patient Education and Counseling, 59(1), 69–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Shelton, R. C., Dunston, S. K., Leoce, N., Jandorf, L., Thompson, H. S., Crookes, D. M., et al. (2016). Predictors of activity level and retention among African American lay health advisors (LHAs) from The National Witness Project: Implications for the implementation and sustainability of community-based LHA programs from a longitudinal study. Implementation Science, 11, 41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Conte, K. P., Held, F., Piptone, O., & Bowman, S. (2019). The feasibility of recruiting and training lay leaders during real-world program delivery and scale-up: The case of Walk With Ease. Health Promotion Practice. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839919840004. Published online April 11, 2019.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Alam, K., Tasneem, S., & Oliveras, E. (2012). Retention of female volunteer community health workers in Dhaka urban slums: A case–control study. Health Policy and Planning, 27, 477–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Nesbit, R., Christensen, R. K., & Brudney, J. L. (2018). The limits and possibilities of volunteering: A framework for explaining the scope of volunteer involvement in public and nonprofit organizations. Public Administration Review, 78, 502–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Prevention Research Center, Arnold School of Public HealthUniversity of South CarolinaColumbiaUSA
  2. 2.Prevention Research Center and Department of Exercise Science, Arnold School of Public HealthUniversity of South CarolinaColumbiaUSA
  3. 3.South Carolina ConferenceThe United Methodist ChurchColumbiaUSA

Personalised recommendations