Children’s Pain and Distress at a Public Influenza Vaccination Clinic: A Parent Survey and Public Observation Study
Immunizations are a necessary but distressing and painful procedure that most infants and children regularly undergo. Each year, a tertiary pediatric hospital in Canada holds an influenza vaccination clinic for all staff and their families. Evidence-based interventions to reduce pain and distress in babies and children are used. Despite this, infants and children continue to be distressed throughout the vaccination procedure. The objectives of this study were to: (1) measure the prevalence of distress among infants and children before, during, and after vaccine administration at the clinic, and (2) evaluate parents’ perception of their child(ren)’s distress before, during, and after vaccine administration and the effectiveness of pain management interventions used during the clinic. A cross-sectional design of naturalistic observation and parent surveys was used and data was analyzed using descriptive statistics. A total of 283 children between 6 months and 18 years were vaccinated at the clinic, with 52% observed to be distressed before, during, or after the procedure. There were 115 parents of 206 children that completed the survey; 47% of these parents perceived that their children were distressed before, during, or after vaccination, and 42% perceived that the pain treatments used for their child(ren) were very effective. The results of this study will continue to inform interventions for needle-related pain and distress management, as well as improvements for future public vaccination clinics.
KeywordsFear Pain management Pediatrics Immunization Influenza
This study was partially funded by the University of Ottawa Undergraduate Research Opportunity Program (UROP). Thank you to the Be Sweet to Babies team of volunteer research assistants for their time, as well as the CHEO Occupational Health and Wellness Team and the Child Life Team for their support.
This study was funded by the University of Ottawa (Grant No. 722240102245).
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare they have no actual or potential conflict of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.
The Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Ethics Board approved this study (#17/152X). All procedures involving human participants were performed in accordance with ethical standards of the institutional research committee.
- 2.Government of Canada. (2015). Prevention of flu (influenza). Retrieved from https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/services/diseases/flu-influenza/prevention-flu-influenza.html.
- 3.World Health Organization. (2012). Vaccines against influenza: WHO position paper. Weekly epidemiological record, 87(47), 461–476.Google Scholar
- 7.Kikuta, A., Gardezi, F., Dubey, V., & Taddio, A. (2011). Practices and perceptions regarding pain and management during routine childhood immunizations: Findings from a focus-group study with nurses working at Toronto Public Health, Ontario. Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases and Medical Microbiology, 22(2), 43–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.World Health Organization. (2015). Reducing pain at the time of vaccination: WHO position paper. Weekly Epidemiological Record, 39(90), 505–516.Google Scholar
- 17.Patel, Y. (2018). Prevalence and management of fear, distress, and pain in children at the CHEO family flu clinic 2017 (Unpublished thesis). University of Ottawa, Canada.Google Scholar
- 19.Harrison, D., & Chouiery, J. (2017). CHEO Family Flu Clinic 2016 (Unpublished report). Canada: Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario.Google Scholar
- 20.Harris, P. A., Taylor, R., Thielke, R., Payne, J., Gonzalez, N., & Conde, J. G. (2009). Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 42(2), 377–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Wright, S., Yelland, M., Heathcote, K., & Ng, S. K. (2014). Fear of needles: Nature and prevalence in general practice. Australian Family Physician, 38(3), 172–176.Google Scholar