Community-Based Efforts to Prevent and Manage Diabetes in Women Living in Vulnerable Communities
- 510 Downloads
Social determinants of health likely play a significant role in the development of type 2 diabetes for women in vulnerable communities. Adult African American women diagnosed with or at-risk for diabetes in Inkster, Michigan (n = 113) and a group of demographically similar women in Flint, Michigan (n = 48) participated in programs aimed at increasing diabetes-related self-management behaviors through peer coaching, health literacy training, and social support. Participants completed surveys to measure changes in health, health behaviors, health literacy, and social support. We found that these diabetes programs with a focus on increasing women’s capacity to practice health management behaviors, navigate the health care system, and connect with social support, led to an increase in healthy behaviors and a reported increase in both overall and diabetes-specific health over an 18 month period. Overall health, general diet and specific diet improved significantly (p < 0.05) from baseline to follow-up, when controlled for age, diabetes status and site. Exercise also improved, but the change was not statistically significant. Women who participated in the intervention changed health behaviors, and increased their sense of health literacy and social support. Improvement in women’s access to and use of community preventive services, and the provision of outreach support using community health workers (CHWs) and peer mentorship was an integral part of creating these changes. Although this study found that a variety of diabetes prevention and management programs provided opportunities for positive health changes, findings also suggest that it is critical to address the burdens women from vulnerable communities face in order to participate in these programs.
KeywordsCommunity health Health promotion Diabetes prevention and management Health disparities Women’s health
This work was supported by funding from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Service’s Office on Women’s Health. The authors would like to thank the community residents, partner organizations, and members of the Inkster Partnership for a Healthier Community for their devoted work to improve the health and wellness of the Inkster community.
- 2.Adler, N. E., & Stewart, J. (2010). Health disparities across the lifespan: Meaning, methods, and mechanisms. Biology of Disadvantage: Socioeconomic Status and Health, 1186, 5–23.Google Scholar
- 3.Roux, A. V. D., & Mair, C. (2010). Neighborhoods and health. Biology of Disadvantage: Socioeconomic Status and Health, 1186, 125–145.Google Scholar
- 5.Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2011). Health and health care disparities among vulnerable populations. Retrieved March 30, 2017, from http://www.innovations.ahrq.gov/issue.aspx?id=28.
- 6.U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Minority Health. (2017). National Partnership for Action to End Health Disparities tool kit for community action. Retrieved March 30, 2017 from http://minorityhealth.hhs.gov/npa/files/Plans/Toolkit/NPA_Toolkit.pdf.
- 7.U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2017). 2020 topics and objectives: diabetes. Retrieved March 30, 2017 from http://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/.topicsobjectives2020/overview.aspx?topicid=8.
- 10.Samuel-Hodge, C., Headen, S., Skelly, A., Ingram, A., Keyserling, T., Jackson, E., et al. (2000). Influences on day-to-day self-management of type 2 diabetes among african-american women - spirituality, the multi-caregiver role, and other social context factors. Diabetes Care, 23(7), 928–933.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 13.Glasgow, R. E., & Eakin, E. G. (1998). Issues in diabetes self-management. In S. A. Shumaker, E. B. Schron, J. K. Ockene & W. L. McBee (Eds.), The handbook of health behavior change (435–461). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- 20.Canadian Public Health Association. (2006). Low health literacy and chronic disease prevention and control—perspectives from the health and public sectors. Retrieved March 30, 2017 from http://www.cpha.ca/uploads/portals/h-l/kl_summary_e.pdf.
- 24.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Diabetes Report Card 2014. (2015). Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, US Dept of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar
- 25.Berkman, L. F. (1985). The relationship of social networks and social support to morbidity and mortality. In S. Cohen, S. L. Syme (Eds.), Social support and health (241–262). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- 27.Kaplan, R. M., & Toshima, M. T. (1990). The functional effects of social relationships on chronic illnesses and disability. In B. S. Sarason, I. G. Sarason & G. R. Pierce (Eds.), Social support: An interactional view (pp. 427–453). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- 32.Kutner, M., Greenberg, E., Jin, Y., & Paulsen, C. (2006). The health literacy of America’s adults: Results from the 2003 National Assessment of Health Literacy (NCES 2006 – 483). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.Google Scholar
- 34.Institute of Medicine (IOM). (2011). Innovations in health literacy research: Workshop summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
- 38.Ramachandran, A., Snehalatha, C., Mary, S., Mukesh, B., Bhaskar, A., Vijay, V., et al. (2006). The indian diabetes prevention programme shows that lifestyle modification and metformin prevent type 2 diabetes in asian indian subjects with impaired glucose tolerance (IDPP-1). Diabetologia, 49(2), 289–297.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 43.American Diabetes Association. (2017). Are you at risk for Type 2 Diabetes? ADA Risk Test. Retrieved March 30, 2017 from http://main.diabetes.org/dorg/PDFs/risk-test-paper-version.pdf.