Influenza Vaccination Beliefs and Practices in Elderly Primary Care Patients
- 1.2k Downloads
The majority of influenza related deaths and hospitalizations occur among individuals ≥65 years, yet the national influenza vaccination rate for this group is 63% and is lower in the Hispanic population. Previous studies have described negative predictors of vaccination; however, there is a knowledge gap of how influenza vaccine-specific beliefs affect vaccination rates. We examined the relationship between influenza vaccine health beliefs and vaccination behaviors in a cross sectional sample of 200 primarily Hispanic patients aged ≥65 years in an academic general internal medicine clinic. Participants were asked about perceptions of influenza vaccine effectiveness and safety. Interview responses regarding influenza vaccine concerns were evaluated qualitatively with conventional content analysis. Logistic regression evaluated associations between beliefs and self-reported vaccination the previous year, adjusted for age, gender, and language. Of those approached to complete the questionnaire, 88% participated. Self-reported influenza vaccination rate during the study year was 75%. Only 46.5% endorsed the belief that influenza vaccine is very effective and 47% that it is very safe. Many stated specific concerns about flu vaccine including that it causes side effects/adverse outcomes, is not effective, vaccine components are harmful, and vaccination is not necessary. Belief that the flu shot causes the flu and concern for variability of the flu shot were associated with reduced odds of vaccination (aOR 0.19, 95% CI [0.05, 0.83] and 0.06 [0.006, 0.63] respectively). The patient-perceived distinction between cold, flu, and other symptoms warrants further exploration. This information can be used to develop targeted communication to promote vaccination.
KeywordsGeriatrics Health behavior Immunization Medical decision making Underserved populations
S. Rikin and V. Scott were supported by Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), Grant Number T0BHP293020100. We thank our research assistant, Angela Barrett.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 5.National Center for Quality Assurance. (2017) Flu Vaccinations. http://www.ncqa.org/report-cards/health-plans/state-of-health-care-quality/2016-table-of-contents/flu-vaccinations. Accessed 11 May 2017.
- 7.Santibanez T, Kahn K, Zhai Y, et al. (2016). Flu vaccination coverage, United States, 2015-2016 influenza season. https://www.cdc.gov/flu/fluvaxview/coverage-1516estimates.htm. Accessed 27 Mar 2017.
- 8.Zimmerman, R. K., Santibanez, T. A., Janosky, J. E., Fine, M. J., Raymund, M., Wilson, S. A., et al. (2003). What affects influenza vaccination rates among older patients? An analysis from inner-city, suburban, rural, and veterans affairs practices. The American Journal of Medicine, 114(1), 31–38.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 20.Nowak, G. J., Sheedy, K., Bursey, K., Smith, T. M., & Basket, M. (2015). Promoting influenza vaccination: insights from a qualitative meta-analysis of 14 years of influenza-related communications research by U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Vaccine, 33(24), 2741–2756.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 24.Maibach, E. W., & Parrott, R. (1995). Designing health messages: Approaches from communication theory and public health practice. Newcastle upon Tyne: Sage.Google Scholar
- 26.Briss, P. A., Rodewald, L. E., Hinman, A. R., Shefer, A. M., Strikas, R. A., Bernier, R. R., et al. (2000) Reviews of evidence regarding interventions to improve vaccination coverage in children, adolescents, and adults. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 18(1):97–140.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 27.Ndiaye, S. M., Hopkins, D. P., Shefer, A. M., Hinman, A. R., Briss, P. A., Rodewald, L., et al. (2005). Interventions to improve influenza, pneumococcal polysaccharide, and hepatitis B vaccination coverage among high-risk adults: A systematic review. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 28(5), 248–279.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar