Advertisement

Journal of Community Health

, Volume 42, Issue 4, pp 739–747 | Cite as

The Adolescent Health Care Broker—Adolescents Interpreting for Family Members and Themselves in Health Care

  • Jennifer R. BanasEmail author
  • James W. Ball
  • Lisa C. Wallis
  • Sarah Gershon
Original Paper

Abstract

Parents with limited English proficiency might rely on their adolescent children to interpret health information. We call this adolescent healthcare brokering. Using a mixed-methods, transformative research approach rooted in grounded theory, we sought to answer these questions: (a) “What is happening? What are people doing?” and (b) “What do these stories indicate? What might they suggest about social justice?” High school students from a community in which 53.4% speak another language at home were invited to participate in a survey and focus groups. Of 238 survey participants, 57.5% (n = 137) indicated they assisted with healthcare tasks. When doing so, 81.7% (n = 112) translated. Common tasks were reading prescriptions and talking to doctors. While some participants cited negative emotions associated with brokering, the net emotion was positive. Focus groups (n = 11) revealed that tasks varied broadly in complexity and type, emotional experiences were dichotomous, and access to interpreting services and other supports was inconsistent. This research adopts an advocacy lens and uses a mixed-methods, transformative research approach rooted in grounded theory to describe and call attention to a social justice phenomenon we call adolescent healthcare brokering. We define adolescent healthcare brokering as young people acting as linguistic interpreters in healthcare situations for themselves and for family members with limited English proficiency (LEP). In such situations, language acts as a barrier to health literacy and access to healthcare [17]. Despite this known barrier, there is a gap in the research regarding how to successfully address this situation (McKee, Paasche-Orlow, Journal of health communication 17(3):7–12, 2012).

Keywords

Adolescent Immigrant Healthcare Interpreting School health Community health Limited English proficiency 

Notes

Funding

Qualitative work funded by a Northeastern Illinois University faculty research summer stipend

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Baker, D. W., Parker, R. M., Williams, M. V., & Clark, W. S. (1998). Health literacy and the risk of hospital admission. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 13(12), 791–798.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory. London; Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chen, A. H., Youdelman, M. K., & Brooks, J. (2007). The legal framework for language access in healthcare settings: Title VI and beyond. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 22 Suppl 2, 362–367. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0366-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Civil Rights Act of 1964, 88–352 C.F.R. § 601 (1964).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cresswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed-methods research (2nd edn.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Exec. Order No. 13166, 65 C.F.R. 50121, (2000).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Faulstich Orellana, M. (2010). From here to there: On the process of an ethnography of language brokering. MediAzioni 10(4), 47–67.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Faulstich Orellana, M., Dorner, L., & Pulido, L. (2003). Accessing assets: immigrant youth’s work as family translators or “para-phrasers”. Social Problems, 50(4), 505–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine Pub. Co.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Green, J., Free, C., Bhavnani, V., & Newman, T. (2005). Translators and mediators: Bilingual young people’s accounts of their interpreting work in health care. Social science & medicine (1982), 60(9), 2097–2110. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.08.067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Health education: Theoretical concepts, effective strategies and core competencies. (ISBN: 978-92-9021-829-6 (online)). (2012). Cairo, Egypt.: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Health literacy interventions and outcomes. (2014). Retrieved from Rockville, MD: http://www.ahrq.gov/research/findings/evidence-based-reports/er199-abstract.html.
  13. 13.
    Hua, J. M., & Costigan, C. L. (2012). The familial context of adolescent language brokering within immigrant Chinese families in Canada. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 41(7), 894–906. doi: 10.1007/s10964-011-9682-2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Illinois Report Card 2014–2015. (2015). Illinois Report Card. Retrieved from http://public-schools.startclass.com/l/30869/Waukegan-High-School.
  15. 15.
    Kam, J. A., & Lazarevic, V. (2014). The stressful (and not so stressful) nature of language brokering: identifying when brokering functions as a cultural stressor for Latino immigrant children in early adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43(12), 1994–2011. doi: 10.1007/s10964-013-0061-z.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Katz, V. (2014). Children as Brokers of Their Immigrant Families’ Health-Care Connections. Social Problems, 61(2), 194–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kutner, M. A. (2006). The health literacy of America’s adults: Results from the 2003 National Assessment of Adult Literacy. Retrieved from Washington, DC.: Table of contents only http://www.loc.gov/catdir/toc/fy0709/2006475219.html.
  18. 18.
  19. 19.
    Language use in the United States: 2007, American Community Survey reports. (2010). Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/prod/2010pubs/acs-12.pdf.
  20. 20.
    McKee, M. M., & Paasche-Orlow, M. K. (2012). Health literacy and the disenfranchised: The importance of collaboration between limited English proficiency and health literacy researchers. Journal of health communication, 17 Suppl (3), 7–12. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2012.712627.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research : A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mertens, D. M. (2003). Mixed methods and the politics of human research: The transformative-emancipatory perspective. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 135–164). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mertens, D. M. (2009). Transformative research and evaluation. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed. ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Purposive Sampling. (2012). Laerd Dissertation. Retrieved from http://dissertation.laerd.com/purposive-sampling.php.
  26. 26.
    QuickFacts, U. S. C. B. S. a. C. (2015, December 2, 2015). State & County QuickFacts—Waukegan (city), Illinois. Retrieved from http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/17/1779293.html.
  27. 27.
    Schillinger, D., Grumbach, K., Piette, J., Wang, F., Osmond, D., Daher, C., Bindman, A. B., (2002). Association of health literacy with diabetes outcomes. JAMA, 288(4), 475–482.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Singleton, K., & Krause, E. M. (2010). Understanding cultural and linguistic barriers to health literacy. Ky Nurse, 58(4), 6–9.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sweetman, D., Badiee, M., & Creswell, J. W. (2010). Use of the transformative framework in mixed methods studies. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(6), 441–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Tolerance, T. (n.d.). Strategies for Reducing Racial and Ethnic Prejudice: Essential Principles for Program Design. Retrieved from http://www.tolerance.org/supplement/strategies-reducing-racial-and-ethnic-prejudice-essential-pr.
  31. 31.
    Tse, L. (1995). Language brokering among Latino adolescents: Prevalence, attitudes, and school performance. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 17, 180–193. doi: 10.1177/07399863950172003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Weiss, B. (1999). 20 common problems in primary care. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Weiss, B. (2007). Health literacy and patient safety: Help patients understand. Manual for clinicians. (2nd. ed.). Chicago, IL: American Medical Association Foundation and American Medical Association.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wolf, M. S., Gazmararian, J. A., & Baker, D. W. (2005). Health literacy and functional health status among older adults. Archives of internal medicine, 165(17), 1946–1952. doi: 10.1001/archinte.165.17.1946.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Northeastern Illinois UniversityChicagoUSA
  2. 2.Waukegan High SchoolWaukeganUSA

Personalised recommendations