Using GIS Mapping to Target Public Health Interventions: Examining Birth Outcomes Across GIS Techniques
- 1.4k Downloads
With advances in spatial analysis techniques, there has been a trend in recent public health research to assess the contribution of area-level factors to health disparity for a number of outcomes, including births. Although it is widely accepted that health disparity is best addressed by targeted, evidence-based and data-driven community efforts, and despite national and local focus in the U.S. to reduce infant mortality and improve maternal-child health, there is little work exploring how choice of scale and specific GIS visualization technique may alter the perception of analyses focused on health disparity in birth outcomes. Retrospective cohort study. Spatial analysis of individual-level vital records data for low birthweight and preterm births born to black women from 2007 to 2012 in one mid-sized Midwest city using different geographic information systems (GIS) visualization techniques [geocoded address records were aggregated at two levels of scale and additionally mapped using kernel density estimation (KDE)]. GIS analyses in this study support our hypothesis that choice of geographic scale (neighborhood or census tract) for aggregated birth data can alter programmatic decision-making. Results indicate that the relative merits of aggregated visualization or the use of KDE technique depend on the scale of intervention. The KDE map proved useful in targeting specific areas for interventions in cities with smaller populations and larger census tracts, where they allow for greater specificity in identifying intervention areas. When public health programmers seek to inform intervention placement in highly populated areas, however, aggregated data at the census tract level may be preferred, since it requires lower investments in terms of time and cartographic skill and, unlike neighborhood, census tracts are standardized in that they become smaller as the population density of an area increases.
KeywordsSpatial analysis Health disparity Low birthweight Preterm birth
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 11.Reader, S. (2001). Detecting and analyizing clusters of low birth weight incidence using exploratory spatial data analysis. Geo-Journal, 53, 2.Google Scholar
- 12.Krieger, N., Waterman, P. D., Chen, J. T., Soobader, M., & Subramanian, S. (2003). Monitoring socioeconomic inequalities in sexually transmitted infections, tuberculosis, and violence: Geocoding and choice of area-based socioeconomic measures—The Public Health Disparities Geocoding Project (US). Public Health Reports, 118, 240–258.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 21.Love, C., David, R. J., Rankin, K. M., & Collins Jr., J. W. (2010). Exploring weathering: Effects of lifelong economic environment and maternal age on low birth weight, small for gestational age, and preterm birth in African-American and white women. American Journal of Epidemiology, 172(2), 127–134.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 23.U.S. Census Bureau. Retrieved September 15, 2015, from https://www.census.gov/newsroom/releases/archives/governments/cb12-161.html.
- 24.U.S. Census Bureau. State and County QuickFacts: Kalamazoo city. Retrieved July 7, 2015, from http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/26/2642160.html.
- 25.Michigan Geocoded Birth File, Division for Vital Records and Health Statistics, Michigan Department of Health and Human Services. (2013). Retrieved July 7, 2015, from http://www.mdch.state.mi.us/pha/osr/CHI/Births/frame.html.
- 26.Centers for Disease Control Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS). (2015). https://chronicdata.cdc.gov/health-area/maternal-child-health.
- 28.City of Kalamazoo, Neighborhoods. Retrieved November 16, 2016, from http://www.kalamazoocity.org/about-kzoo/neighborhoods.