Journal of Community Health

, Volume 40, Issue 4, pp 714–724 | Cite as

Acceptability and Feasibility of Physical Activity Assessment Methods for an Appalachian Population

  • Yelena N. Tarasenko
  • Britteny M. Howell
  • Christina R. Studts
  • Scott J. Strath
  • Nancy E. Schoenberg
Original Paper


Nowhere is improving understanding and accurate assessment of physical activity more important for disease prevention and health promotion than among health disparities populations such as those residing in rural and Appalachian regions. To enhance accurate assessment of physical activity and potentially improve intervention capacity, we conducted a mixed-methods study examining the acceptability and feasibility of self-report physical activity questionnaires, pedometers, and accelerometers among rural Appalachian children, adolescents, and adults. Most participants reported positive experiences with all three physical activity assessment tools. Several acceptability ratings differed by age group and by sex within each age group. With very few exceptions, no significant differences in acceptability were found by race, education, employment status, health status, BMI categories, income levels, or insurance status within age groups or overall. Several factors may impact the choice of the physical activity assessment method, including target population age, equipment cost, researcher burden, and potential influence on physical activity levels. Children and adolescents appear to have more constraints on when they can wear pedometers and accelerometers. While pedometers are inexpensive and convenient, they may influence physical activity levels, rather than simply measure them. Accelerometers, while less influential on behavior, consume extensive resources, including high purchase costs and researcher burden.


Physical activity Pedometer Accelerometer Self-report Appalachia 


  1. 1.
    Bauman, A., Phongsavan, P., Schoeppe, S., & Owen, N. (2006). Physical activity measurement-a primer for health promotion. Promotion and Education, 13(2), 92–103.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Corder, K., Ekelund, U., Steele, R. M., Wareham, N. J., & Brage, S. (2008). Assessment of physical activity in youth. Journal of Applied Physiology, 105(3), 977–987.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wareham, N. J., & Rennie, K. L. (1998). The assessment of physical activity in individuals and populations: Why try to be more precise about how physical activity is assessed? International Journal of Obesity and Related Metabolic Disorders, 22(suppl 2), S30–S38.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bennett, K. J., Olatosi, B., & Probst, J. C. (2008). Health disparities: A rural-urban chartbook. South Carolina Rural Health Research Center. Retrieved from
  5. 5.
    Jones, C. A., Parker, T. S., Ahearn, M., Mishra, A. K., & Variyam, J. N. (2009). Health status and health care access of farm and rural populations. United States Department of Agriculture: Economic information bulletin 57. Retrieved from
  6. 6.
    Serrano, E., Leiferman, J., & Dauber, S. (2007). Self-efficacy and health behaviors toward the prevention of diabetes among high risk individuals living in Appalachia. Journal of Community Health, 32(2), 121–133.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2011) National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Division of Diabetes Translation. Physical inactivity estimates, By county. Retrieved from
  8. 8.
    Frost, S. S., Goins, R., Hunter, R. H., Hooker, S. P., Bryant, L. L., Kruger, J., & Pluto, D. (2010). Effects of the built environment on physical activity of adults living in rural settings. American Journal of Health Promotion, 24(4), 267–283.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Whaley, D. E., & Haley, P. P. (2008). Creating community, assessing need: Preparing for a community physical activity intervention. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 79(2), 245–255.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Barker, L., Crespo, R., Gerzoff, R. B., Denham, S., Shrewsberry, M., & Cornelius-Averhart, D. (2010). Residence in a distressed county in Appalachia as a risk factor for diabetes, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2006–2007. Preventing Chronic Disease, 7(5), A104.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Powell, L. M., Slater, S., Chaloupka, F. J., & Harper, D. (2006). Availability of physical activity-related facilities and neighborhood demographic and socioeconomic characteristics: A national study. American Journal of Public Health, 96(9), 1676–1680.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kirtland, K. A., Porter, D. E., & Addy, C. L. (2003). Environmental measures of physical activity supports: Perception versus reality. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 24(4), 323–331.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Saelens, B. E., Sallis, J. F., & Frank, L. D. (2003). Environmental correlates of walking and cycling: Findings from the transportation, urban design, and planning literatures. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 25(2), 80–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    United States Department of Agriculture. (2009). Broadband internet’s value for rural America. Economic Research Report. No. 78. Retrieved from
  15. 15.
    Kegler, M. C., Swan, D. W., Alcantara, I., Wrensford, L., & Glanz, K. (2012). Environmental influences on physical activity in rural adults: The relative contributions of home, church and work settings. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 9(7), 996–1003.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shores, K. A., West, S. T., Theriault, D. S., & Davison, E. A. (2009). Extra-individual correlates of physical activity attainment in rural older adults. Journal of Rural Health, 25(2), 211–218.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Martin, S. L., Kirkner, G. J., Mayo, K., Matthews, C. E., Durstine, J. L., & Hebert, J. R. (2005). Urban, rural, and regional variations in physical activity. Journal of Rural Health, 21(3), 239–244.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Parks, S. E., Housemann, R. A., & Brownson, R. C. (2003). Differential correlates of physical activity in urban and rural adults of various socioeconomic backgrounds in the United States. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 57(1), 29–35.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Baranowski, T., & Domel, S. (1994). A cognitive model of children’s reporting of food intake. American Jounral of Clinincal Nutrition, 59, 212S–217S.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Baxter, S., Thompson, W., Davis, H., & Johnson, M. (1997). Impact of gender, ethnicity, meal component, and time interval between eating and reporting on accuracy of fourth-graders: Self-reports.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lytle, L., Murray, D., Perry, C., & Eldridge, A. (1998). Validating fourth-grade students’ self-report of dietary intake: Results from the 5 A Day Power Plus program. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 98, 570–572.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hart, T. L., Swartz, A. M., Cashin, S. E., & Strath, S. J. (2011). How many days of monitoring predict physical activity and sedentary behavior in older adults? International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 8, 62.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Davidson, L. J., Ryan, W. J., Rohay, J. M., & Sereika, S. M. (1996). Technological advances in data entry and verification: Is teleform for you? Nursing Research, 45(6), 373–376.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Nies, M. A., & Hein, L. (2000). Teleform: A blessing or burden? Public Health Nursing, 17(2), 143–145.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Friederich, C. M., Courneya, K. S., Neilson, H. K., Mattews, C. E., Willis, G., Irwin, M., et al. (2006). Reliability and validity of the past year total physical activity questionnaire. American Journal of Epidemiology, 163(10), 959–970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tudor-Locke, C., Burkett, L., Reis, J. P., Ainsworth, B. E., Macera, C. A., & Wilson, D. K. (2005). How many days of pedometer monitoring predict weekly physical activity in adults? Preventive Medicine, 40(3), 293–298.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    MacQueen, K. M., McLellan, E., Kay, K., & Milstein, B. (1998). Codebook development for team-based qualitative analysis. Cultural Anthropology Methods, 10(2), 31–36.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Weston, C., Gandell, T., Beauchamp, J., McAlpine, L., Wiseman, C., & Beauchamp, C. (2001). Analyzing interview data: The development and evolution of a coding system. Qualitative Sociology, 24(3), 381–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Appalachian Regional Commission. (2011). The Appalachian region: A data overview from the 2007–2011 American Community Survey. Retrieved from
  30. 30.
    Resnicow, K., McCarty, F., Blissett, D., Wang, T., Heitzler, C., & Lee, R. E. (2003). Validity of a modified CHAMPS physical activity questionnaire among African-Americans. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 35(9), 1537–1545.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Stewart, A. L., Mills, K. M., King, A. C., Haskell, W. L., Gillis, D., & Ritter, P. L. (2001). CHAMPS physical activity questionnaire for older adults: Outcomes for interventions. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 33(7), 1126–1141.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Bravata, D. M., Smith-Spangler, C., & Sundaram, V. (2007). Using pedometers to increase physical activity and improve health: A systematic review. Journal of the American Medical Association, 298(19), 2296–2304.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Talbot, L. A., Gaines, J. M., Huynh, T. N., & Metter, E. J. (2003). A home-based pedometer-driven walking program to increase physical activity in older adults with osteoarthritis of the knee: A preliminary study. Journal of the American Geriatric Society, 51(3), 387–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yelena N. Tarasenko
    • 1
  • Britteny M. Howell
    • 2
  • Christina R. Studts
    • 3
  • Scott J. Strath
    • 4
  • Nancy E. Schoenberg
    • 5
  1. 1.Departments of Health Policy and Management and Epidemiology, Jiann-Ping Hsu College of Public HealthGeorgia Southern UniversityStatesboroUSA
  2. 2.Departments of Anthropology, Behavioral Science, and Health BehaviorUniversity of KentuckyLexingtonUSA
  3. 3.Department of Health Behavior, College of Public HealthUniversity of KentuckyLexingtonUSA
  4. 4.Department of KinesiologyUniversity of Wisconsin – MilwaukeeMilwaukeeUSA
  5. 5.Colleges of Public Health and MedicineUniversity of KentuckyLexingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations