Acceptability and Feasibility of Physical Activity Assessment Methods for an Appalachian Population
Nowhere is improving understanding and accurate assessment of physical activity more important for disease prevention and health promotion than among health disparities populations such as those residing in rural and Appalachian regions. To enhance accurate assessment of physical activity and potentially improve intervention capacity, we conducted a mixed-methods study examining the acceptability and feasibility of self-report physical activity questionnaires, pedometers, and accelerometers among rural Appalachian children, adolescents, and adults. Most participants reported positive experiences with all three physical activity assessment tools. Several acceptability ratings differed by age group and by sex within each age group. With very few exceptions, no significant differences in acceptability were found by race, education, employment status, health status, BMI categories, income levels, or insurance status within age groups or overall. Several factors may impact the choice of the physical activity assessment method, including target population age, equipment cost, researcher burden, and potential influence on physical activity levels. Children and adolescents appear to have more constraints on when they can wear pedometers and accelerometers. While pedometers are inexpensive and convenient, they may influence physical activity levels, rather than simply measure them. Accelerometers, while less influential on behavior, consume extensive resources, including high purchase costs and researcher burden.
KeywordsPhysical activity Pedometer Accelerometer Self-report Appalachia
- 4.Bennett, K. J., Olatosi, B., & Probst, J. C. (2008). Health disparities: A rural-urban chartbook. South Carolina Rural Health Research Center. Retrieved from http://rhr.sph.sc.edu/report/(73)%20Health%20Disparities%20A%20Rural%20Urban%20Chartbook%20-%20Distribution%20Copy.pdf.
- 5.Jones, C. A., Parker, T. S., Ahearn, M., Mishra, A. K., & Variyam, J. N. (2009). Health status and health care access of farm and rural populations. United States Department of Agriculture: Economic information bulletin 57. Retrieved from http://www.ers.usda.gov/media/155453/eib57_1_.pdf.
- 7.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2011) National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Division of Diabetes Translation. Physical inactivity estimates, By county. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/features/dsphysicalinactivity/.
- 10.Barker, L., Crespo, R., Gerzoff, R. B., Denham, S., Shrewsberry, M., & Cornelius-Averhart, D. (2010). Residence in a distressed county in Appalachia as a risk factor for diabetes, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2006–2007. Preventing Chronic Disease, 7(5), A104.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 14.United States Department of Agriculture. (2009). Broadband internet’s value for rural America. Economic Research Report. No. 78. Retrieved from http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/err-economic-research-report/err78.aspx#.Ut7z_PQo4z4.
- 19.Baranowski, T., & Domel, S. (1994). A cognitive model of children’s reporting of food intake. American Jounral of Clinincal Nutrition, 59, 212S–217S.Google Scholar
- 20.Baxter, S., Thompson, W., Davis, H., & Johnson, M. (1997). Impact of gender, ethnicity, meal component, and time interval between eating and reporting on accuracy of fourth-graders: Self-reports.Google Scholar
- 27.MacQueen, K. M., McLellan, E., Kay, K., & Milstein, B. (1998). Codebook development for team-based qualitative analysis. Cultural Anthropology Methods, 10(2), 31–36.Google Scholar
- 29.Appalachian Regional Commission. (2011). The Appalachian region: A data overview from the 2007–2011 American Community Survey. Retrieved from www.arc.gov/assets/research_reports/PRBDataOverviewReport2007-2011-Chapter7.pdf.