Journal of Community Health

, Volume 40, Issue 5, pp 927–939 | Cite as

Establishing the SouthWestern Academic Health Network (SWAHN): A Survey Exploring the Needs of Academic and Community Networks in SouthWestern Ontario

  • Kathryn Nicholson
  • Jasmine Randhawa
  • Margaret Steele
Original Paper


With the evolving fields of health research, health professional education and advanced clinical care comes a need to bring researchers, educators and health care providers together to enhance communication, knowledge-sharing and interdisciplinary collaboration. There is also a need for active collaboration between academic institutions and community organizations to improve health care delivery and health outcomes in the community setting. In Canada, an Academic Health Sciences Network model has been proposed to achieve such activities. The SouthWestern Academic Health Network (SWAHN) has been established among three universities, three community colleges, community hospitals, community-based organizations and health care providers and two Local Health Integrated Networks (LHINs) in Southwestern Ontario. A survey was conducted to understand the characteristics, activities, existing partnerships, short- and long-term goals of the academic and community health networks in SouthWestern Ontario to inform the development of SWAHN moving forward. A total of 114 health networks were identified from the two participating LHINs, 103 community health networks and 11 academic health networks. A mailed survey was sent to all networks and responses were analyzed using both quantitative and qualitative approaches. The short- and long-term goals of these networks were categorized into five main themes: Public Health, Education, Research, System Delivery and Special Populations. Overall, this study helped to elicit important information from the academic and community based networks, which will inform the future work of SWAHN. This research has also demonstrated the significance of collecting information from both academic and community partners during the formation of other interdisciplinary health networks.


SouthWestern Academic Health Network Academic Health Sciences Network Community Academia Interdisciplinary Survey 


Conflicts of interest


Ethical standard

Ethical approval was successfully obtained from The University of Western Ontario Research Ethics Board (Study No. 104828). The authors obtained informed consent from all participants, who received and completed a consent form before their participation in the study.


  1. 1.
    Bressler, B. (2009). Securing the future of Canada’s Academic Health Sciences Centres. Academic Health Sciences Centres—National Task Force. Retrieved from
  2. 2.
    Lozon, J., & Fox, R. (2002). Academic Health Sciences Centres Laid Bare. Healthcare Papers, 2(3), 10–36. doi: 10.12927/hcpap.2002.17202.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Blumenthal, D., & Meyer, G. S. (1996). Academic health centers in a changing environment. Health Affairs, 15(2), 200–215. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.15.2.200.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    National Task Force on the Future of Canada’s Academic Health Sciences Centres. (2010). Three Missions One Future: Optimizing the Performance of Canada’s Academic Health Sciences Centres. Retrieved from
  5. 5.
    Walshe, K., & Davies, H. T. O. (2013). Health research, development and innovation in England from 1988 to 2013: From research production to knowledge mobilization. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 18(3 Suppl), 1–12. doi: 10.1177/1355819613502011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fish, D. R. (2013). Academic health sciences networks in England. The Lancet, 381(9882), e18–e19. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60866-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Practice Education in British Columbia. (2013). Retrieved from
  8. 8.
    Saskatchewan Academic Health Sciences Network (SAHSN)—University of Saskatchewan. (2014). Retrieved from
  9. 9.
    Toronto Academic Health Science Network. (2014). Retrieved from
  10. 10.
    Limites des territoires des RUIS. (2014). Retrieved from
  11. 11.
    Heart Disease, Stroke, and Healthy Living—Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada. (2014). Retrieved from
  12. 12.
    Alzheimer Society of London Middlesex. (2013). Retrieved from
  13. 13.
    Southwestern Ontario Stroke Network. (2014). Retrieved from
  14. 14.
    Institute for Clinical Evaluative Services (ICES) Western. (2014). Retrieved from
  15. 15.
    DELPHI—DELiver Primary Healthcare Information. (2014, March 26). Retrieved from
  16. 16.
    Gateway Centre of Excellence in Rural Health. (2014). Retrieved from
  17. 17.
    Dillman, D. A. (1978). Mail and telephone surveys: The total design method. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hoddinott, S. N., & Bass, M. J. (1986). The Dillman total design survey method. Canadian Family Physician, 32, 2366–2368.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools (2013). Measuring impact of research partnerships: The CIROP Tool. Hamilton, ON: McMaster University. Retrieved from
  20. 20.
    Bains, N., Dall, K., Hay, C., Pacey, M., Sarkella, J., & Ward, M. (2004). Population Health Profile: South West LHIN. Health System Intelligence project. Retrieved from

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kathryn Nicholson
    • 1
  • Jasmine Randhawa
    • 2
  • Margaret Steele
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Centre for Studies in Family Medicine, Kresge Building 2nd FloorWestern UniversityLondonCanada
  2. 2.Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Clinical Skills Building 3rd FloorWestern UniversityLondonCanada
  3. 3.Hospital and Interfaculty Relations, Departments of Psychiatry, Paediatrics and Family Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Clinical Skills Building 3rd FloorWestern UniversityLondonCanada

Personalised recommendations