Advertisement

Journal of Community Health

, Volume 40, Issue 4, pp 633–641 | Cite as

Decreased Cancer Mortality-to-Incidence Ratios with Increased Accessibility of Federally Qualified Health Centers

  • Swann Arp AdamsEmail author
  • Seul Ki Choi
  • Leepao Khang
  • Dayna A. Campbell
  • Daniela B. Friedman
  • Jan M. Eberth
  • Russell E. Glasgow
  • Reginald Tucker-Seeley
  • Sudha Xirasagar
  • Mei Po Yip
  • Vicki M. Young
  • James R. Hébert
Original Paper

Abstract

Federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) offer primary and preventive healthcare, including cancer screening, for the nation’s most vulnerable population. The purpose of this study was to explore the relationship between access to FQHCs and cancer mortality-to-incidence ratios (MIRs). One-way analysis of variance was conducted to compare the mean MIRs for breast, cervical, prostate, and colorectal cancers for each U.S. county for 2006–2010 by access to FQHCs (direct access, in-county FQHC; indirect access, adjacent-county FQHC; no access, no FQHC either in the county or in adjacent counties). ArcMap 10.1 software was used to map cancer MIRs and FQHC access levels. The mean MIRs for breast, cervical, and prostate cancer differed significantly across FQHC access levels (p < 0.05). In urban and healthcare professional shortage areas, mean MIRs decreased as FQHC access increased. A trend of lower breast and prostate cancer MIRs in direct access to FQHCs was found for all racial groups, but this trend was significant for whites only. States with a large proportion of rural and medically underserved areas had high mean MIRs, with correspondingly more direct FQHC access. Expanding FQHCs to more underserved areas and concentrations of disparity populations may have an important role in reducing cancer morbidity and mortality, as well as racial-ethnic disparities, in the United States.

Keywords

Cancer Community health centers Medically underserved areas African Americans Health care disparity 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This publication was supported by Cooperative Agreement Number U48/DP001936 from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (Prevention Research Centers) and the National Cancer Institute (PIs: Dr. Hébert, Dr. Friedman). This work also was partially supported by: an Established Investigator Award in Cancer Prevention and Control from the Cancer Training Branch of the NCI to Dr. Hébert (K05 CA136975), U54 CA153461-01 from the National Cancer Institute, Center to Reduce Cancer Health Disparities (Community Networks Program) to the South Carolina Cancer Disparities Community Network-II (SCCDCN-II), and an NCI K01 Career Development Grant to Dr. Tucker-Seeley (K01 CA169041). Dr. Yip was partially supported by the National Cancer Institute (R01 CA 124397; PI: S-P Tu).

Conflict of interest

No financial disclosures were reported by the authors of this paper.

Supplementary material

10900_2014_9978_MOESM1_ESM.eps (4 mb)
Figure S1. Access to FQHCs and colorectal cancer MIRs by region. (a) West, (b) Midwest, (c) Northeast, (d) Southwest, (e) Southeast. Supplementary material 1 (EPS 4107 kb)
10900_2014_9978_MOESM2_ESM.eps (4 mb)
Figure S2. Access to FQHCs and prostate cancer MIRs by region. (a) West, (b) Midwest, (c) Northeast, (d) Southwest, (e) Southeast. Supplementary material 2 (EPS 4107 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Siegel, R., Ma, J., Zou, Z., & Jemal, A. (2014). Cancer statistics, 2014. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 64(1), 9–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schoen, R. E., Pinsky, P. F., Weissfeld, J. L., et al. (2012). Colorectal-cancer incidence and mortality with screening flexible sigmoidoscopy. New England Journal of Medicine, 366(25), 2345–2357.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tabár, L., Vitak, B., Chen, T. H., et al. (2011). Swedish two-county trial: Impact of mammographic screening on breast cancer mortality during 3 decades. Radiology, 260(3), 658–663.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tangen, C. M., Hussain, M. H., Higano, C. S., et al. (2012). Improved overall survival trends of men with newly diagnosed M1 prostate cancer: a SWOG phase III trial experience (S8494, S8894 and S9346). Journal of Urology, 188(4), 1164–1169.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Saslow, D., Solomon, D., Lawson, H. W., et al. (2012). American Cancer Society, American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, and American Society for Clinical Pathology screening guidelines for the prevention and early detection of cervical cancer. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 62(3), 147–172.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Simard, E. P., Naishadham, D., Saslow, D., & Jermal, A. (2012). Age-specific trends in black–white disparities in cervical cancer incidence in the United States: 1975–2009. Gynecologic Oncology, 127(3), 611–615.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Siegel, R., Naishadham, D., & Jemal, A. (2012). Cancer statistics for hispanics/latinos, 2012. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 62(5), 283–298.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hopenhayn, C., Bush, H., Christian, A., & Shelton, B. J. (2005). Comparative analysis of invasive cervical cancer incidence rates in three Appalachian states. Preventive Medicine, 41(5), 859–864.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Shin, P., Rosenbaum, S., Paradise, J. (2012). Community health centers: The challenge of growing to meet the need for primary care in medically underserved communities. Washington, DC: The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. Available at: https://publichealth.gwu.edu/departments/healthpolicy/DHP_Publications/pub_uploads/dhpPublication_3B043800-5056-9D20-3D5DCAA18AC4BD43.pdf.
  10. 10.
    Bureau of Primary Health Care, US Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration. HRSA geospatial data warehouse. http://datawarehouse.hrsa.gov/HRSAActivityStatus.aspx. Accessed September 3, 2013.
  11. 11.
    Human Resources and Service Administration, US Department of Health and Human Services. Health centers and the affordable care act fact sheet. http://bphc.hrsa.gov/about/healthcenterfactsheet.pdf. Accessed May 2, 2014.
  12. 12.
    Hébert, J. R., Daguise, V. G., Hurley, D. M., et al. (2009). Mapping cancer mortality-to-incidence ratios to illustrate racial and sex disparities in a high-risk population. Cancer, 115(11), 2539–2552.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wagner, S. E., Hurley, D. M., Hébert, J. R., McNamara, C., Bayakly, A. R., & Vena, J. E. (2012). Cancer mortality-to-incidence ratios in Georgia. Cancer, 118(16), 4032–4045.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    National Cancer Institute. State Cancer Profiles: Dynamic views of cancer statistics for prioritizing caner control efforts in the nation, states, and counties. http://statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov/index.html. Accessed September 3, 2013.
  15. 15.
    US Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration. Area Resource File (ARF). http://www.arfsys.com. Accessed September 2, 2012.
  16. 16.
    U.S. Census Bureau. American Community Survey. http://www.census.gov/acs/www/data_documentation/data_main/. Accessed October 25, 2013.
  17. 17.
    Bodenheimer, T., & Pham, H. H. (2010). Primary care: Current problems and proposed solutions. Health Affairs, 29(5), 799–805.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    National Association of Community Health Centers. (2013). A sketch of community health centers: Chart book. http://www.nachc.com/client/Chartbook2013.pdf. Accessed October 22, 2013.
  19. 19.
    Shi, L., & Stevens, G. D. (2007). The role of community health centers in delivering primary care to the underserved: experiences of the uninsured and Medicaid insured. The Journal of Ambulatory Care Management, 30(2), 159–170.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Starfield, B., Powe, N. R., Weiner, J. R., et al. (1994). Costs vs quality in different types of primary care settings. JAMA, 272(24), 1903–1908.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Probst, J. C., Laditka, S. B., Wang, J. Y., & Johnson, A. O. (2007). Effects of residence and race on burden of travel for care: Cross sectional analysis of the 2001 US National Household Travel Survey. BMC Health Services Research, 7(1), 40.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pucher, J., & Renne, J. L. (2005). Rural mobility and mode choice: Evidence from the 2001 National Household Travel Survey. Transportation, 32(2), 165–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jemal, A., Siegel, R., Xu, J., & Ward, E. (2010). Cancer statistics, 2010. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 60(5), 277–300.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Moyer, V. A. (2012). Screening for prostate cancer: US preventive services task force recommendation statement. Annals of Internal Medicine, 157(2), 120–134.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Adams, S. A., Fleming, A., Brandt, H. M., et al. (2009). Racial disparities in cervical cancer mortality in an African American and European American cohort in South Carolina. Journal-South Carolina Medical Association, 105(7), 237–244.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Moyer, A., Sohl, S. J., Knapp-Oliver, S. K., & Schneider, S. (2009). Characteristics and methodological quality of 25 years of research investigating psychosocial interventions for cancer patients. Cancer Treatment Reviews, 35(5), 475–484.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Swann Arp Adams
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  • Seul Ki Choi
    • 1
    • 4
  • Leepao Khang
    • 5
  • Dayna A. Campbell
    • 6
  • Daniela B. Friedman
    • 1
    • 4
  • Jan M. Eberth
    • 1
    • 2
  • Russell E. Glasgow
    • 7
  • Reginald Tucker-Seeley
    • 8
    • 9
  • Sudha Xirasagar
    • 1
    • 10
  • Mei Po Yip
    • 11
  • Vicki M. Young
    • 6
  • James R. Hébert
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Arnold School of Public HealthUniversity of South CarolinaColumbiaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public HealthUniversity of South CarolinaColumbiaUSA
  3. 3.College of NursingUniversity of South CarolinaColumbiaUSA
  4. 4.Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, Arnold School of Public HealthUniversity of South CarolinaColumbiaUSA
  5. 5.Department of Public HealthCalifornia State University, FresnoFresnoUSA
  6. 6.South Carolina Primary Health Care AssociationColumbiaUSA
  7. 7.School of Medicine and Colorado Health Outcomes Research ProgramUniversity of Colorado at DenverAuroraUSA
  8. 8.Department of Social and Behavioral SciencesHarvard School of Public HealthBostonUSA
  9. 9.Center for Community Based ResearchDana-Farber Cancer InstituteBostonUSA
  10. 10.Department of Health Services Policy and Management, Arnold School of Public HealthUniversity of South CarolinaColumbiaUSA
  11. 11.Division of General Internal MedicineUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations