Traditional and Innovative Promotional Strategies of Tobacco Cessation Services: A Review of the Literature
- 754 Downloads
An estimated 43.5 million American adults currently smoke cigarettes. Well-designed tobacco education campaigns with adequate reach increase cessation and reduce tobacco use. Smokers report great interest in quitting but few use effective treatments including quitlines (QLs). This review examined traditional (TV, radio, print ads) versus innovative tobacco cessation (internet, social media) promotions for QL services. Between November 2011 and January 2012, searches were conducted on EBSCO, PubMed, Wilson, OCLC, CQ Press, Google Scholar, Gale, LexisNexis, and JSTOR. Existing literature shows that the amount of radio and print advertising, and promotion of free cessation medications increases QL call volume. Television advertising volume seems to be the best predictor of QL service awareness. Much of the literature on Internet advertising compares the characteristics of participants recruited for studies through various channels. The majority of the papers indicated that Internet-recruited participants were younger; this was the only demographic characteristic with high agreement across studies. Traditional media was only studied within mass media campaigns with TV ads having a consistent impact on increasing calls to QLs, therefore, it is hard to distinguish the impact of traditional media as an independent QL promotion intervention. With innovative media, while many QL services have a presence on social media sites, there is no literature on evaluating the effectiveness of these channels for quitline promotion.
KeywordsTobacco Smoking cessation Tobacco use cessation
This study was funded by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) through the Office of the Secretary Award #200-2008-27958 Task Order 0014.
- 1.CDC. (2008). Smoking-attributable mortality, years of potential life lost, and productivity losses—United States, 2000–2004. MMWR, 57, 1226–1228.Google Scholar
- 2.CDC. (2011). Quitting smoking among adults—United States, 2001–2010. MMWR, 60(44), 1513–1519.Google Scholar
- 3.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2007). Best Practices for Comprehensive Tobacco Control Programs—2007. Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health.Google Scholar
- 6.Stead, L. F., Lancaster, T., Perera, R. (2004). Telephone counseling for smoking cessation (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library 2004, Issue 1. Chichester, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
- 7.Fiore, M. C., et al. (2008). Treating tobacco use and dependence: 2008 Update- Clinical Practice Guide. U.S. Public Health Service. May 2008. http://www.surgeongeneral.gov/tobacco/treating_tobacco_use08.pdf.
- 8.Zhu, S. H. (2000). Telephone quitlines for smoking cessation. In: National Cancer Institute. Population Based Smoking Cessation: Proceedings of a Conference on What Works to Influence Cessation in the General Population. Smoking and Tobacco Control Monograph No. 12. Bethesda, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, NIH Pub. No. 00–4892, November 2000:189–198.Google Scholar
- 9.Pew Internet and American Life Project. http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2012/Counting-internet-users/Counting-internet-users.aspx.
- 10.MMWR. Increases in quitline calls and smoking cessation website visitors during a national tobacco Educational Campaign-March 19-June 10, 2012. Retrieved from October 22, 2012 http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6134a2.htm.
- 11.EBSCO Database. Retrieved from http://www.ebsco.com/.
- 12.U.S. National Library of Medicine. National Institutes of Health. PubMed Database. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/.
- 13.Wilson Database. Retrieved from http://ebscohost.com/wilson.
- 14.OCLC Database. Retrieved from https://www.oclc.org/unitedstates/en_us/home.html?redirect=true.
- 15.CQ Press Database. Retrieved from http://www.cqpress.com/gethome.asp.
- 16.Google Scholar Database. Retrieved from http://scholar.google.com/.
- 17.Gale Cengage Learning. Retrieved from http://www.gale.cengage.com/.
- 18.LexisNexis Total Research System. Retrieved from http://www.lexisnexis.com/en-us/home.page.
- 19.JSTOR Database. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/.
- 20.North American Quitline Consortium. (2010). Innovative approaches and proven strategies for maximizing reach. Retrieved from http://www.naquitline.org/resource/resmgr/Case_Studies/100720_IA-case-study.pdf; http://www.naquitline.org/resource/resmgr/Case_Studies/100720_NY-case-study.pdf; http://www.naquitline.org/resource/resmgr/case_studies/okcasestudy2010.pdf; http://www.naquitline.org/resource/resmgr/case_studies/sdcasestudy2010.pdf.
- 21.Pierce, J. P., Anderson, D. M., Romano, R. M., Meissner, H. I., & Odenkirchen, J. C. (1992). Promoting smoking cessation in the United States: Effect of public service announcements on the Cancer Information Service telephone line. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 84, 677–683.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Miller, C. L., Wakefield, M., & Roberts, L. (2003). Uptake and effectiveness of the Australian television quitline service in the context of a mass media campaign. Tobacco Control, 12(Suppl II), ii153–ii158.Google Scholar
- 26.Erbas, B., Bui, Q., Huggins, R., Harper, T., & White, V. (2006). Investigating the relation between placement of quit antismoking advertisements and number of telephone calls to QL: A semi parametric modeling approach. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 60, 180–182.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.Siahpush, M., Wakefield, M. A., Spittal, M. J., & Durkin, S. J. (2007). Evidence based public health policy and practice: Antismoking television advertising and socioeconomic variations in calls to the quitline. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 61(4), 298–301.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.Bui, Q. M., Huggins, R. M., Hwang, W., White, V., & Erbas, B. (2010). A varying coefficient to measure the effectiveness of mass media anti-smoking campaigns in generating calls to the quitline. Journal of Epidemiology, 20(6), 473–479. doi: 10.2188/jea.JE20090105.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 34.Durkin, S. J., Wakefield, M. A., & Spittal, M. J. (2011). Which types of televised anti-tobacco campaigns prompt more quitline calls from disadvantaged groups? Health Education Research. Advance access.Google Scholar
- 35.Farrelly, M. C., Davis, K. C., Nonnemaker, J. M., Kamyab, K., & Jackson, C. (2011). Promoting calls to a quitline: Quantifying the influence of message theme, strong negative emotions, and graphic images in television advertisements. Tobacco Control, 20, 279–284. doi: 10.1136/tc.2010.042234.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 40.Graham, A. L., Milner, P., Saul, J. E., & Pfaff, L. (2008). Online advertising as a public health and recruitment tool: Comparison of different media campaigns to increase demand for smoking cessation interventions. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 10(5), E50. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1001.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 45.Milner, P., Long, A. W., & Kazimir, E. O. (2005). Online advertising: A cost-effective mechanism for promoting cessation services. Presented at the 2005 national conference on tobacco of health, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
- 47.National Cancer Institute. (2008). The role of the media in promoting and reducing tobacco use. NCI Tobacco Control Monograph 19. Washington, D.C. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar
- 48.Reducing Tobacco Use and Secondhand Smoke Exposure: Quitline Interventions. Summary Evidence Table for Mass-Reach Health Communication Interventions to Promote Quitline Use. Retrieved from http://www.thecommunityguide.org/tobacco/supportingmaterials/SET-Quitlines-MassReach.pdf.