Advertisement

Journal of Community Health

, Volume 39, Issue 4, pp 719–726 | Cite as

Key Beliefs Related to Decisions for Physical Activity Engagement Among First-in-Family Students Transitioning to University

  • Eloise Cowie
  • Kyra Hamilton
Original Paper

Abstract

The current study investigated key beliefs related to decisions for physical activity (PA) engagement among first-in-family (FIF) students transitioning to university. FIF students (n = 157) completed an online questionnaire assessing standard theory of planned behaviour constructs and belief-based items. One week later, participants completed a follow-up questionnaire assessing self-reported PA during the previous week. Results identified a range of behavioural, normative, and control beliefs that were significantly correlated with both PA intention and behaviour. Various key beliefs were also identified in relation to FIF students’ decisions to be regularly physically active, with behavioural beliefs such as “take up too much time”, normative beliefs including “friends outside of university”, and control beliefs such as “cost”, identified. Finally, frequencies of those who strongly or fully accepted these beliefs were analysed, demonstrating that typically, a large number of FIF students did not hold the beliefs, and as such, these are relevant to target in resultant interventions. The current study effectively highlights a number of key beliefs that can be targeted in programs aimed at encouraging FIF students’ PA. Further, the study addresses a gap in the literature of targeting FIF students, a cohort at risk for inactivity, and utilises a sound theoretical framework to identify the unique set of beliefs guiding decisions for PA for this at-risk community group.

Keywords

Physical activity University students Theory of planned behaviour Beliefs Intervention 

References

  1. 1.
    Australian Government Department of Health and Aging. (2005). An active way to better health: National physical activity guidelines for adults. Canberra, ACT: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Guiney, H., & Machado, L. (2013). Benefits of regular aerobic exercise for executive functioning in healthy populations. Psychonomic Bulletin Review, 20(10), 73–86. doi: 10.3759/s13423-012-0345-4.
  3. 3.
    Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2013). Australian Health Survey: Physical Activity, 2011–2012, (no. 4364.0.55.004). Canberra, ACT: Australian Bureau of Statistics.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bray, S., & Born, H. (2004). Transition to university and vigorous physical activity: Implications for health and psychological well-being. Journal of American College Health, 52(4), 181–188. http://search.proquest.com.libraryproxy.griffith.edu.au/docview/213030921?accountid=14543.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Talebi, M., Matheson, K., & Anisman, H. (2013). Does being first in family matter? The role of identity in the stigma of seeking help among first and non-first in family university students. The International Journal of the First Year in Higher Education, 4(1), 47–58. doi: 10.5204/intjfyhe.v4i1.137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Luzeckyj, A., King, S., Scutter, S., & Brinkworth, R. (2011). The significance of being first: A consideration of cultural capital in relation to “first in family” student’s choices of university and program. A practise report. The International Journal of the First Year in Higher Education, 2(2), 91–96. doi: 10.5204/intfyhe.v2i2.89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gyurcsik, N., Bray, S., & Brittain, D. (2004). Coping with barriers to vigorous physical activity during transition to university. Family Community Health, 27(2), 130–142. http://ovidsp.tx.ovid.com.libraryproxy.griffith.edu.au/.
  8. 8.
    Muller-Riemenschneider, F., Reinhold, T., Nocon, M., & Willich, S. (2008). Long-term effectiveness of interventions promoting physical activity: A systematic review. Preventative Medicine, 47(4), 354–368. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.07.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behaviour. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Van de Plight, J., & De Vries, N. (1998). Belief importance in expectancy-value models of attitudes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28(15), 1339–1354. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01680.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hamilton, K., & White, K. (2010). Understanding parental physical activity: Meanings, habits, and social role influence. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 11(4), 275–285. doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport2010.02.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hamilton, K., & White, K. (2011). Identifying key belief-based targets for promoting physical activity among mothers and fathers with young children. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 14(2), 135–142. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2010.07.004.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    White, K., Terry, D., Troup, C., & Rempel, L. (2007). Behavioural, normative, and control beliefs underlying low-fat dietary and regular physical activity behaviours for adults diagnosed with type 2 diabetes and/or cardiovascular disease. Psychology, Health and Medicine, 12(4), 485–494. doi: 10.1080/13548500601089932.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Conn, V., Tripp-Reimer, T., & Maas, M. (2003). Older women and exercise: Theory of planned behaviour beliefs. Public Health Nursing, 20(2), 153–163. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1446.2003.20209.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Downs, D., & Hausenblas, H. (2005). Elicitation studies and the theory of planned behaviour: A systematic review of exercise beliefs. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 6(1), 1–31. doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2003.08.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Beliefs, attitude, intention and behaviour: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hamilton, K., & White, K. (2010). Identifying parents’ perceptions about physical activity: A qualitative exploration of salient behavioural, normative, and control beliefs among mothers and fathers of young children. Journal of Health Psychology, 15(8), 1157–1169. doi: 10.1177/1359105310364176.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    von Haeften, I., Fishbein, M., Kasprzyk, D., & Montano, D. (2001). Analyzing data to obtain information to design targeted interventions. Psychology, Health and Medicine, 6(2), 151–164. doi: 10.1080/13548500125076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hornik, R., & Woolf, K. (1999). Using cross-sectional surveys to plan message strategies. Social Marketing Quarterly, 5(1), 34–41. doi: 10.1080/15245004.1999.9961044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    MacCann, C., Fogarty, G., & Roberts, R. (2011). Strategies for success in education: Time management is more important for part-time than full-time community college students. Learning and Individual Differences, 22(5), 618–623. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2011.09.015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ward, L., Siegel, M., & Davenport, Z. (2012). First-generation college students: Understanding and improving the experience from recruitment to commencement. http://www.eblib.com.
  22. 22.
    Crutzen, R., & Goritz, A. (2011). Does social desirability compromise self-reports of physical activity in web-based research? The International Journal of Behavioural Nutrition and Physical Activity, 8(31), 31–35. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-8-31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Applied PsychologyGriffith UniversityMt GravattAustralia

Personalised recommendations