Using GIS to Evaluate a Fire Safety Program in North Carolina
- 365 Downloads
Evaluating program impact is a critical aspect of public health. Utilizing Geographic Information Systems (GIS) is a novel way to evaluate programs which try to reduce residential fire injuries and deaths. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the application of GIS within the evaluation of a smoke alarm installation program in North Carolina. This approach incorporates national fire incident data which, when linked with program data, provides a clear depiction of the 10 years impact of the Get Alarmed, NC! program and estimates the number of potential lives saved. We overlapped Get Alarmed, NC! program installation data with national information on fires using GIS to identify homes that experienced a fire after an alarm was installed and calculated potential lives saved based on program documentation and average housing occupancy. We found that using GIS was an efficient and quick way to match addresses from two distinct sources. From this approach we estimated that between 221 and 384 residents were potentially saved due to alarms installed in their homes by Get Alarmed, NC!. Compared with other program evaluations that require intensive and costly participant telephone surveys and/or in-person interviews, the GIS approach is inexpensive, quick, and can easily analyze large disparate datasets. In addition, it can be used to help target the areas most at risk from the onset. These benefits suggest that by incorporating previously unutilized data, the GIS approach has the potential for broader applications within public health program evaluation.
KeywordsGIS Program evaluation Fire safety Methodology Potential lives saved Geocoding Injury surveillance
- 2.Ahrens, M. (2012). U.S. Home structural fires (pp. 1–5). Quincy, MA: National Fire Protection Association, Fire Analysis and Research Division.Google Scholar
- 3.Ahrens, M. (2004). U.S. Experience with smoke alarms and other fire alarms. Quincy, MA: National Fire Protection Association.Google Scholar
- 12.Renger, R., Cimetta, A., Pettygrove, S., & Rogan, S. (2002). Geographic information systems (GIS) as an evaluation tool. American Journal of Evaluation, 23, 469–479.Google Scholar
- 14.Waring, S., Zakos-Feliberti, A., Wood, R., Stone, M., Padgett, P., & Arafat, R. (2005). The utility of geographic information systems (GIS) in rapid epidemiological assessments following weather-related disasters: Methodological issues based on tropical storm allison experience. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health, 208, 109–116.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Thammapalo, S., Meksawi, S., & Chongsuvivatwong, V. (2012). Effectiveness of space spraying on the transmission of Dengue/DHF in an urban area of Southern Thailand. Journal of Tropical Medicine, 2012:1–7. doi:10.1155/2012/652564.
- 21.North Carolina Office of the State Fire Marshall. Personal correspondence with Kim Williams, May 2012.Google Scholar
- 22.ArcGIS 10 (2012). ESRI [ArcGIS 10.1]. Redlands, CA.Google Scholar
- 23.ArcGIS 10 Online Address Locator. (2012). ESRI [ArcGIS 10.1]. Redlands, CA.Google Scholar