Journal of Community Health

, Volume 38, Issue 1, pp 86–94 | Cite as

Resources, Roadblocks and Turning Points: A Qualitative Study of American Indian/ Alaska Native Adults with Type 2 Diabetes

  • Jennifer L. ShawEmail author
  • Jennifer Brown
  • Burhan Khan
  • Marjorie K. Mau
  • Denise Dillard
Original Paper


Type 2 diabetes is a worldwide health problem that has reached epidemic proportions in some communities. Alaska Native and American Indian (AN/AI) people are disproportionately diagnosed with type 2 diabetes and incidence is increasing in many Alaska communities. Developing effective interventions requires understanding the social and psychological factors that impact effective management of diabetes, yet little is known about these factors in AN/AI communities. The objective of this study was to explore perceived psychosocial needs and barriers to management of diabetes among AN/AI adults with type 2 diabetes receiving care at the Alaska Native Primary Care Center (ANPCC) to inform programmatic efforts and potential future research. We conducted three focus groups and five interviews with 13 AN/AI adults with type 2 diabetes. Interview and focus group questions elicited perceived factors that affect management of diabetes, with a focus on the psychological, social and spiritual impacts of diabetes. Data were transcribed, coded and analyzed using thematic analysis. Key themes that emerged from these data included resources and roadblocks, as well as turning points in the trajectory of diabetes. Resources are factors with a perceived positive impact on management of diabetes, including: (1) knowledge and education about diabetes, (2) social support from other people with diabetes, (3) spirituality, and (4) self-efficacy. Roadblocks are factors with a perceived negative impact on management of diabetes and include: (1) self-reported lack of knowledge about nutrition and diet, (2) social difficulties caused by dietary restrictions, and (3) co-morbid medical conditions. Finally, turning points are experiences described by participants as having transformed roadblocks in resources and thus facilitating improvement in the management of diabetes. Future programmatic interventions to improve management of diabetes with this population should focus on improving dietary education and social support opportunities for newly-diagnosed individuals. Also, educational and support opportunities for family members and friends of individuals with diabetes should also be offered to facilitate understanding and support of their loved ones’ management of diabetes, especially with regard to dietary restrictions in social settings. Efforts should also focus on strengthening newly-diagnosed individuals’ self-efficacy and providing ongoing support as individuals progressively adjust to the illness over time and make behavioral changes. Future research with this population should explore the effects of family support groups and the possibility of Web-based or other alternative interventions for improving psychosocial health and management of diabetes efforts.


Type 2 diabetes Adult American Indian and Alaska Native Health promotion Community health Psychosocial needs Barriers Social support Health education Spirituality Self-efficacy 


  1. 1.
    Wild, S., et al. (2004). Global prevalence of diabetes: Estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030. Diabetes Care, 27(5), 1047–1053.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Coventry, P., et al. (2011). Talking about depression: A qualitative study of barriers to managing depression in people with long term conditions in primary care. BMC Family Practice, 12(10).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Anderson, R. J., et al. (2001). The prevalence of comorbid depression in adults with diabetes: A meta-analysis. Diabetes Care, 24(6), 1069–1078.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Peyrot, M., & Rubin, R. R. (1997). Levels and risks of depression and anxiety symptomatology among diabetic adults. Diabetes Care, 20(4), 585–590.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Warnock, J. K., & Mutzig, E. M. (1998). Diabetes mellitus and major depression: Considerations for treatment of Native Americans. Journal Oklahoma State Medical Association, 91(9), 488–493.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ciechanowski, P. S., Katon, W. J., & Russo, J. E. (2000). Depression and diabetes: Impact of depressive symptoms on adherence, function, and costs. Archives of Internal Medicine, 160(21), 3278–3285.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ciechanowski, P. S., et al. (2003). The relationship of depressive symptoms to symptom reporting, self-care and glucose control in diabetes. General Hospital Psychiatry, 25(4), 246–252.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Egede, L. E. (2004). Diabetes, major depression, and functional disability among U.S. adults. Diabetes Care, 27(2), 421–428.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Egede, L. E., Zheng, D., & Simpson, K. (2002). Comorbid depression is associated with increased health care use and expenditures in individuals with diabetes. Diabetes Care, 25(3), 464–470.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lustman, P. J., et al. (2000). Depression and poor glycemic control: A meta-analytic review of the literature. Diabetes Care, 23(7), 934–942.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Odegard, P.S., & K. Capoccia. (2007). Medication taking and diabetes: A systematic review of the literature. Diabetes Education, 33(6): 1014–1029; discussion 1030–1031.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Auslander, W.F., et al. Psychosocial resources and barriers to self-management in African American adolescents with type 2 diabetes: A qualitative analysis. Diabetes Education, 36(4): 613–622.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dovey-Pearce, G., Doherty, Y., & May, C. (2007). The influence of diabetes upon adolescent and young adult development: A qualitative study. British Journal of Health Psychology, 12(Pt 1), 75–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gee, L., et al. (2007). The clinical, psychosocial, and socioeconomic concerns of urban youth living with diabetes. Public Health Nursing, 24(4), 318–328.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gallant, M. P., Spitze, G. D., & Prohaska, T. R. (2007). Help or hindrance? How family and friends influence chronic illness self-management among older adults. Research on Aging, 29(5), 375–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    van Dam, H. A., van der Horst, F. G., Knoops, L., Ryckman, R. M., Crebolder, H. F., van den Borne, B. H. (2005). Social support in diabetes: A systematic review of controlled intervention studies. Patient Education and Counseling, 59(1), 1–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Brady D. D. (1994). Use of mental health services by American Indian and Alaska Native elders. American Indian and Alaska Native Mental Health Research, 5(3), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jennifer L. Shaw
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jennifer Brown
    • 1
  • Burhan Khan
    • 1
  • Marjorie K. Mau
    • 2
  • Denise Dillard
    • 1
  1. 1.Research DepartmentSouthcentral FoundationAnchorageUSA
  2. 2.Department of Native Hawaiian HealthUniversity of Hawaii at ManoaHonoluluUSA

Personalised recommendations