Advertisement

Journal of Community Health

, Volume 38, Issue 1, pp 54–61 | Cite as

Reaching Rural Women: Breast Cancer Prevention Information Seeking Behaviors and Interest in Internet, Cell Phone, and Text Use

  • Cynthia KratzkeEmail author
  • Susan Wilson
  • Hugo Vilchis
Original Paper

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the breast cancer prevention information seeking behaviors among rural women, the prevalence of Internet, cell, and text use, and interest to receive breast cancer prevention information cell and text messages. While growing literature for breast cancer information sources supports the use of the Internet, little is known about breast cancer prevention information seeking behaviors among rural women and mobile technology. Using a cross-sectional study design, data were collected using a survey. McGuire’s Input–Ouput Model was used as the framework. Self-reported data were obtained from a convenience sample of 157 women with a mean age of 60 (SD = 12.12) at a rural New Mexico imaging center. Common interpersonal information sources were doctors, nurses, and friends and common channel information sources were television, magazines, and Internet. Overall, 87 % used cell phones, 20 % had an interest to receive cell phone breast cancer prevention messages, 47 % used text messaging, 36 % had an interest to receive text breast cancer prevention messages, and 37 % had an interest to receive mammogram reminder text messages. Bivariate analysis revealed significant differences between age, income, and race/ethnicity and use of cell phones or text messaging. There were no differences between age and receiving text messages or text mammogram reminders. Assessment of health information seeking behaviors is important for community health educators to target populations for program development. Future research may identify additional socio-cultural differences.

Keywords

Internet Text message Health information Breast cancer Communication 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Alamogordo Imaging Center for their partnership to conduct the study at the center.

References

  1. 1.
    American Cancer Society. (2012). Cancer Facts and Figures. http://www.cancer.org/acs/groups/content/@epidemiologysurveilance/documents/document/acspc-026238.pdf Retreived from 21 May 2012.
  2. 2.
    County Health Ranking and Roadmaps. New Mexico. http://www.countyhealthrankings.org/app/new-mexico/2012/measures/factors/50/map Retrieved from 19 May 2012.
  3. 3.
    Tejeda, S., Thompson, B., Coronado, G., Martin, D., & Heagerty, P. (2009). Predisposing and enabling factors associated with mammography use among Hispanic and non-Hispanic white women living in a rural area. Journal of Rural Health, 25(1), 85–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Henry, K. (2009). Kaiser Family Foundation. Putting women’s health care disparities on the map: Examining racial and ethnic disparities at the state level report. http://www.kff.org/minorityhealth/upload/7886.PDF. Retrieved from 22 May 2012.
  5. 5.
    County Health Rankings & Roadmaps. http://www.countyhealthrankings.org/print/county/snapshots/2011/35/027+035. Retrieved from 22 May 2012.
  6. 6.
    Maliski, S., Connor, S., Fink, A., & Litwin, M. (2006). Information desired and acquired by me with prostate cancer: Data from ethnic focus groups. Health Education & Behavior, 33(3), 393–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kratzke, C., Garzon, L., Lombard, J., & Karlowicz, K. (2010). Training community health workers: Factors that influence mammography use. Journal of Community Health, 35(6), 683–686.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nekhlyudov, L., Rongk, L., & Fletcher, S. (2005). Information and involvement preferences of women in their 40 s before their first screening mammogram. Archives of Internal Medicine, 165, 1370–1374.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kelly, K., Sturm, A., Kemp, K., Holland, J., & Ferketich, A. (2009). How can we reach them? Information seeking and preferences for a cancer family history campaign in underserved communities. Journal of Health Communication, 14, 573–589.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Geana, M., Greiner, K., Cully, A., Talawyma, M., & Daley, C. (2012). Improving health promotion to American Indians in the Midwest United States: Preferred sources of health information and its use for the medical encounter. Journal of Community Health,. doi: 10.1007/s10900-012-9564-x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lewis, N., Martinez, L., Freres, D., et al. (2012). Seeking cancer-related information from media and family/friends increases fruit and vegetable consumption among cancer patients. Health Communication, 27(4), 38–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Talosig-Garcia, M., & Davis, S. (2005). Information-seeking behavior of minority breast cancer survivors: An exploratory study. Journal of Health Communication, 10, 53–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Walsh-Childers, K., Edwards, H., & Grobmyer, S. (2011). Covering women’s greatest health fear: Breast cancer information in consumer magazines. Health Communication, 26, 209–220.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Couglin, S., Berkowitz, Z., Hawkins, N., & Tangka, F. (2007). Breast and colorectal cancer screening and sources of information among older women in the United States: Results from the 2003 Health Information National Trends Survey. Preventing Chronic Disease: Public Health Research, Practice and Policy, 4(3), 1–12.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kirschning, S., & Kardorff, E. (2008). The use of the Internet by women with breast cancer and men with prostate cancer—Results of online research. Journal of Public Health, 16, 133–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Longo, D., Ge, B., Radina, M., et al. (2009). Understanding breast-cancer patients’ perceptions: Health information seeking behavior and passive information receipt. Journal of Communication in Healthcare, 2(2), 184–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Brenner, J. (2012). Pew internet: Mobile. Pew internet & American life project. http://www.pewinternet.org/Commentary/2012/February/Pew-Internet-Mobile.aspx. Retrieved from 21 May 2012.
  18. 18.
    Rice, R. E., & Katz, J. E. (2003). Comparing internet and mobile phone usage: Digital divides of usage, adoption, and dropouts. Telecommunications Policy, 27, 597–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fukuoka, Y., Komatsu, J., Suarez, L., et al. (2011). The mPED randomized controlled clinical trial: Applying mobile persuasive technologies to increase physical activity in sedentary women protocol. BMS Public Health, 11(1), 933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    USDHHS. Healthy People (2020). Health Communications and Health Information Technology Objectives. Washington, DC, 2010. http://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topicsobjectives2020/objectiveslist.aspx?topicid=18. Retrieved from 23 May 2012.
  21. 21.
    Denizard-Thompson, N., Feiereisel, K., Stevens, S., Miller, D., & Wofford, J. (2011). The digital divide at an urban community health center: Implications for quality improvement and health care access. Journal of Community Health, 36(3), 456–460.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Samal, L., Hutton, H., Erbelding, E., Brandon, E., Finkelstein, J., & Chandler, G. (2009). Digital divide: Variation in internet and cellular phone use among women attending an urban sexually transmitted infections clinic. Journal of Urban Health, 87(1), 122–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    The Participation divide: Separate and unequal in digital media? http://www.pewinternet.org/Media-Mentions/2012/The-Participation-Divide.aspx. Retrieved from 23 May 2012.
  24. 24.
    McGuire, W. (1989). Theoretical foundations of campaigns. Public communication campaigns (2nd ed., pp. 43–65). Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    U.S. Census. http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/35000.html. Retrieved from 20 May 2012.
  26. 26.
    County Health Rankings and Roadmaps. http://ibis.health.state.nm.us/community/highlight/introduction/GeoCnty/35.html. Retrieved from 22 May 2012.
  27. 27.
    Isaac, S., & Michael, W. (1997). Handbook in research and evaluation (3rd ed.). San Diego: EdiTS/Educational and Industrial Testing Services.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mayer, D., Terrin, C., Kreps, G., et al. (2006). Cancer survivors information seeking behaviors: A comparison of survivors who do and do not seek information about cancer. Patient Education and Counseling,. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.08.015.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Colby, S., Johnson, A., Eickhoff, A., & Johnson, L. (2011). Promoting community health resources: Preferred communication strategies. Health Promotion Practice, 12(2), 271–279.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Watson, A., Bell, A., Kvedar, J., & Grant, R. (2008). Reevaluating the digital divide: Current lack of internet use is not a barrier to adoption of novel health information technology. Diabetes Care, 31(3), 433–435.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sajid, J., Shakir, A., & Baig, M. (2011). Information on the internet about colorectal cancer: Patient attitude and potential toward Web browsing. A prospective observational study. Canadian Journal of Surgery, 54(5), 339–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Cegala, D. J., Bahnson, R. R., Clinton, S. K., et al. (2008). Information seeking and satisfaction with physician–patient communication among prostate cancer survivors. Health Communication, 23, 62–69.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Fashner, J., & Drye, S. (2011). Internet availability and interest in patients at a family medicine residency clinic. Family Medicine, 43(2), 117–120.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Health Science, MSC 3HLSNew Mexico State UniversityLas CrucesUSA
  2. 2.Border Epidemiology and Environmental Center, College of Health and Social ServicesNew Mexico State UniversityLas CrucesUSA

Personalised recommendations