Journal of Community Health

, Volume 37, Issue 5, pp 949–956 | Cite as

Trail User Demographics, Physical Activity Behaviors, and Perceptions of a Newly Constructed Greenway Trail

  • Anna E. Price
  • Julian A. Reed
  • Suresh Muthukrishnan
Original Paper


To better understand and promote physical activity on a newly constructed trail, the present study examined the demographic characteristics and physical activity behaviors of trail users; the demographic characteristics of trail users compared to the demographic profile Greenville County, South Carolina residents; trail users’ purpose for using the trail; the distance trail users traveled to access the trail from their homes; channels through which trail users learned about the trail; and trail characteristics liked by trail users. Using a valid and reliable intercept survey, 1,148 trail users were interviewed. Trail users were mostly white (93.1%), male (59.1%) adults (84.2%) who reported using the trail for exercise (91%). Significant associations were identified between trail user demographic characteristics and how trail users learned about the trail and trail characteristics liked by trail users. The findings may contribute to the development of targeted health promotion efforts to promote physical activity on this and similar trails.


Trail Physical activity Intercept survey Exercise Built environment 



Funding was provided by the United States Environmental Protection Agency under cooperative agreement XA-95454910-0.


  1. 1.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2011). US physical activity statistics. Accessed 5 Nov 2001.
  2. 2.
    American College of Sports Medicine, Chodzko-Zajko, W., Proctor, D., et al. (2009). Exercise and physical activity for older adults. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 41(7), 1510–1530.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Merom, D., Bauman, A., & Vita, P. (2003). An environmental intervention to promote walking and cycling-the impact of a newly constructed Rail Trail in Western Sydney. Preventive Medicine, 36, 235–242.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sallis, J., Cervero, R., Ascher, W., Henderson, K., FKaft, M., & Kerr, J. (2006). An ecological approach to creating active living communities. Annual Reviews of Public Health, 27, 297–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sallis, J., Owen, N., & Fisher, B. (2008). Ecological models of health behavior. In K. Glanz & B. Rimer (Eds.), Health behavior and health education: Theory, research, and practice (4th ed., pp. 465–485). San Francisco: Josey-Bass.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Reed, J., Morrison, A., & Arant, C. (2009). Profile differences of paved vs. natural surface trails. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 6, 112–118.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Reed, J., & Wilson, D. (2006). Awareness and use of a university trail. Journal of American College Health, 54(4), 227–230.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Reed, J., Ainsworth, B., Wilson, D., Mixon, G., & Cooke, A. (2004). Awareness and use of community walking trails. Preventive Medicine, 39(5), 903–908.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lindsey, G., & Nguyen, D. (2004). Use of greenway trails in Indiana. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 130(4), 213–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    West, S., & Shores, K. (2011). The impacts of building a greenway on proximate residents’ physical activity. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 8(8), 1092–1097.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Task Force on Community Preventive Services. (2002). Recommendations to increase physical activity in communities. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 22(4S), 67–72.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Reed, J., Arant, C., Wells, P., Stevens, K., Hagen, S., & Harring, H. (2008). A descriptive examination of the most frequently used activity settings in 25 community parks using direct observation. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 5(s1), s183–s195.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Librett, J., Yore, M., & Schmid, T. (2006). Characteristics of physical activity levels among trail users in a US national sample. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 31(5), 399–405.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bedimo-Rung, A., Mowen, A., & Cohen, C. (2005). The significance of parks to physical activity and public health. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 28(Suppl 2), 159–168.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Reed, J., Hooker, S., Muthukrishnan, S., & Hutto, B. (2011). User demographics and physical activity behaviors on a newly constructed urban rail/trail conversion. Journal of Physical Activity and Health., 8, 534–542.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Maslow, A., Reed, J., Price, A., & Hooker, S. (in press). Associations between sociodemographic characteristics and perceptions of the built environment on the frequency, type, and duration of physical activity among trail users. Preventing Chronic Disease.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Price, A., Reed, J., Long, S., Maslow, A., & Hooker, S. (2012) The association of natural elements with physical activity intensity during trail use by older adults. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 9(6).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Price, A Reed, J., & Hooker, S. (in press). The association of natural elements and trail use by adults. Preventing Chronic Disease.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kreuter, M., & Wray, R. (2003). Tailored and targeted health communication. American Journal of Health Behavior, 27(S3), S227–S232.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Troped, P., Whitcomb, H., Hutto, B., Reed, J., & Hooker, S. (2009). Reliability of a brief intercept survey for trail use behaviors. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 6(6), 775–780.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    U.S. Census Bureau. (2010). Profile of general population and housing characteristics: 2010 demographic profile data. 7 Accessed Nov 2011.
  22. 22.
    Wilcox, S., Oberrecht, L., Bopp, M., Kammermann, S., & McElmurray, C. (2005). A qualitative study of exercise in older African American and White women in rural South Carolina: Perceptions, barriers, and motivations. Journal of Women and Aging, 17(1–2), 37–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mannoff, R. (1985). Social marketing. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kotler, P., Roberto, N., & Lee, N. (2002). Social marketing: Improving the quality of life (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Maller, C., Townsend, M., & St Leger, L. (2002). Healthy parks, healthy people: The health benefits of contact with nature in a park context. Melbourne: Deakin University.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hansmann, R., Hug, S., & Seeland, K. (2007). Restoration and stress relief through physical activities in forests and parks. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 6(4), 213–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anna E. Price
    • 1
  • Julian A. Reed
    • 2
  • Suresh Muthukrishnan
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Physical Therapy and Human Movement SciencesSacred Heart UniversityFairfieldUSA
  2. 2.Department of Health SciencesFurman UniversityGreenvilleUSA
  3. 3.Department of Earth and Environmental SciencesFurman UniversityGreenvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations