Journal of Community Health

, Volume 37, Issue 2, pp 468–472 | Cite as

Acute Myocardial Infarction Mortality Before and After State-wide Smoking Bans

  • Brad RoduEmail author
  • Nicholas Peiper
  • Philip Cole
Original Paper


Rapid declines in hospital admissions for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) following smoke-free ordinances have been reported in smaller communities. The AMI mortality rate among persons age 45 + years (deaths per 100,000 persons, age-standardized to the 2000 US population) in the 3 years before adoption of the smoke-free ordinance (the expected rate) was compared with the rate observed in the first full year after the ban (the target year) in six US states. Target-year declines were also compared to those in states without smoking bans. Target-year declines in AMI mortality in California (2.0%), Utah (7.7%) and Delaware (8.1%) were not significantly different from the expected declines (P = 0.16, 0.43 and 0.89, respectively). In South Dakota AMI mortality increased 8.9% in the target year (P = 0.007). Both a 9% decline in Florida and a 12% decline in New York in the 2004 target year exceeded the expected declines (P = 0.04 and P < 0.0002, respectively) but were not significantly different (P = 0.55 and 0.08, respectively) from the 9.8% decline that year in the 44 states without bans. Smoke-free ordinances provide a healthy indoor environment, but their implementation in six states had little or no immediate measurable effect on AMI mortality.


Myocardial infarction Secondhand smoke Smoke-free ordinances 



Dr. Rodu’s research is supported by unrestricted grants from tobacco manufacturers (Swedish Match AB, Reynolds American Inc. Services Company Altria Client Services, and British American Tobacco) to the University of Louisville, and by the Kentucky Research Challenge Trust Fund. The terms of the grants assure that the sponsors are unaware of this study, and thus had no scientific input or other influence with respect to its design, analysis, interpretation or preparation of the manuscript. None of the authors has any financial or other personal relationship with regard to the sponsors.


  1. 1.
    Sargent, R. P., Shepard, R. M., & Glantz, S. A. (2004). Reduced incidence of admissions for myocardial infarction with public smoking: Before and after study. BMJ, 328, 977–980.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bartecchi, C., Alsever, R. N., Nevin-Woods, C., et al. (2006). Reduction in the incidence of acute myocardial infarction associated with a citywide smoking ordinance. Circulation, 114, 1490–1496.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Khuder, S. A., Milz, S., Jordan, T., Price, J., Silvestri, K., & Butler, P. (2007). The impact of a smoking ban on hospital admissions for coronary heart disease. Preventive Medicine, 45, 3–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Seo, D.-C., & Torabi, M. R. (2007). Reduced admissions for acute myocardial infarction associated with a public smoking ban: Matched controlled study. Journal of Drug Education, 37, 217–226.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pell, J. P., Haw, S., Cobbe, S., et al. (2008). Smoke-free legislation and hospitalizations for acute coronary syndrome. The New England Journal of Medicine, 359, 482–491.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cesaroni, G., Forastiere, F., Agabiti, N., Valente, P., Zuccaro, P., & Perucci, C. A. (2008). Effect of the Italian smoking ban on population rates of acute coronary events. Circulation, 117, 1183–1188.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Barone-Adesi, F., Vizzini, L., Merletti, F., & Richiardi, L. (2006). Short-term effects of Italian smoking regulation on rates of hospital admission for acute myocardial infarction. European Heart Journal, 27, 2468–2472.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lemstra, M., Neudorf, C., & Opondo, J. (2008). Implications of a public smoking ban. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 99, 62–65.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2007). National center for health statistics (NCHS), office of analysis and epidemiology(OAE), compressed mortality file (CMF) on CDC WONDER On-line database. Available at Accessed 1 Aug 2011.
  10. 10.
    Lowry, R. (2009). VassarStats: Website for statistical computation, available at Accessed 1 Aug 2011.
  11. 11.
    Shetty, K. D., DeLeire, T., White, C., & Bhattacharya, J. (2010). Changes in US hospitalization and mortality rates following smoking bans. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 30, 6–28.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Juster, H. R., Loomis, B. R., Hinman, T. M., et al. (2007). Decline in hospital admissions for acute myocardial infarction in New York state after implementation of a comprehensive smoking ban. American Journal of Public Health, 97, 2035–2039.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rodu, B., & Cole, P. (2004). Helena study random variation confirmed. Rapid response to Sargent RP, Shepard RM, Glantz SA: Reduced incidence of admissions for myocardial infarction with public smoking: before and after study. BMJ, 328, 977–980. Available at: Accessed 1 Aug 2011.
  14. 14.
    Ford, E. S., Ajani, U. A., Croft, J. B., et al. (2007). Explaining the decrease in US deaths from coronary disease, 1980–2000. The New England Journal of Medicine, 356, 2388–2398.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    US Department of Health and Human Services. (1993). Major local tobacco control ordinances in the United States. Smoking and tobacco control monograph 3. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    RTI International. (2004). First annual independent evaluation of New York’s Tobacco control program. North Carolina: Research Triangle Park. Available at: Accessed 1 Aug 2011.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of MedicineUniversity of LouisvilleLouisvilleUSA
  2. 2.School of Public HealthUniversity of LouisvilleLouisvilleUSA
  3. 3.Department of Epidemiology, School of Public HealthUniversity of Alabama at BirminghamBirminghamUSA

Personalised recommendations