Organizational Change: A Way to Increase Colon, Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening in Primary Care Practices
- 463 Downloads
Screening tests for colon, cervical and breast cancer remain underutilized despite their proven effectiveness in reducing morbidity and mortality. Stone et al. concluded that cancer screening is most likely to improve when a health organization supports performance through organizational changes (OC) in staffing and clinical procedures. OC interventions include the use of separate clinics devoted to prevention, use of a planned care visit, designation of non-physician staff for specific prevention activities and continuous quality improvement interventions. Objectives To identify specific elements of OC interventions that increases the selected cancer screening rates. To determine to which extent practices bought into the interventions. Methods Eleven randomized controlled trials from January 1990 to June 2010 that instituted OC to increase cancer screening completion were included. Qualitative data was analyzed by using a framework to facilitate abstraction of information. For quantitative data, an outcome of measure was determined by the change in the proportion of eligible individuals receiving cancer screening services between intervention and control practices. The health prevention clinic intervention demonstrated a large increase (47%) in the proportion of completed fecal occult blood test; having a non-physician staff demonstrated an increase in mammography (18.4%); and clinical breast examination (13.7%); the planned care visit for prevention intervention increased mammography (8.8%); continuous quality improvement interventions showed mixed results, from an increase in performance of mammography 19%, clinical breast examination (13%); Pap smear (15%) and fecal occult blood test (13%), to none or negative change in the proportion of cancer screening rates. Conclusions To increase cancer screening completion goals, OC interventions should be implemented tailored to the primary care practice style. Interventions that circumvent the physicians were more effective. We could not conclude whether or not continuous quality techniques were effective. Further research is needed to evaluate cost-effectiveness of these interventions.
KeywordsCancer screening Primary care Organizational change Secondary prevention Practice improvement
Dr. Arroyave was supported by an American Cancer Society Scholarship. Dr. Lewis was supported by a K07 Mentored Career Development Award (5K07CA104128) from the National Cancer Institute.
- 1.US Cancer Statistics Working Group. (2010). United States Cancer Statistics: 1999–2006 incidence and mortality web-based report. Atlanta: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute; [cited 2010 07/15]; Available from: www.cdc.gov/uscs.
- 2.FastStats. (2007). Leading causes of death. National Center for Health Statistics. Center for Disease Control. [cited 2010 07/15]; Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/lcod.htm.
- 3.Medicare Preventive Services. (2010). US Department of Health and Human Services. [cited 2010 07/15]; Available from: http://www.medicare.gov/navigation/manage-your-health/preventive-services/preventive-service-overview.aspx.
- 4.Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2010). Guide to clinical preventive services. Cancer. US Department of Health and Human Services. [cited 2010 07/15]; Available from: http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/cps3dix.htm#cancer.
- 5.American Cancer Society. (2010) .Cancer facts & figures. [Report] [cited 2010 07/15]; Available from: http://www.cancer.org/Research/CancerFactsFigures/CancerFactsFigures/cancer-facts-and-figures-2010.
- 6.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2010) .Health disparities in cancer. US Department of Health and Human Services. [cited 2010 07/15/2010]; Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/cancer/healthdisparities/.
- 20.McLaughlin, C. P. (2006). Continuous quality improvement in health care theory, implementations, and applications (3rd ed.). Sudbury, MA: Jones and Barlett.Google Scholar
- 21.Kaiser Permanent. RE-AIM Framework. (2010). Hosted by Kaiser Permanente Colorado Region. Institute for Health Research. Available from: http://www.re-aim.org/. Accessed 15 July 2010.