Journal of Community Health

, Volume 35, Issue 4, pp 409–416 | Cite as

Media Attention and Public Perceptions of Cancer and Eastern Equine Encephalitis

Original Paper


Previous research has found that members of the public have a skewed sense of health risk. The purpose of this research was to investigate how mass media use influences perceptions of threat from cancer and eastern equine encephalitis (EEE). Investigators performed a media content analysis of 253 health-related articles from 11 Massachusetts newspapers, then used logistic regression to analyze responses to a health communication survey of 613 Massachusetts adults. A greater proportion of cancer articles compared to those about EEE mentioned progress in combating the disease (61.0% vs. 16.2%, P < 0.0001), while a greater proportion of EEE articles mentioned new incidents of illness (35.4%, vs. 4.6% P < 0.0001). Over half of all respondents perceived EEE as an equal or greater threat than cancer. Paying a lot of attention to health media was related to higher odds of perceiving EEE as a threat (OR 2.14; 95% CI 1.03–4.45), and of perceiving EEE as a threat compared to cancer (OR 2.18; 95% CI 1.24–3.84). Media treatment of health stories that emphasize the novelty and unpredictability of EEE compared to cancer may lead to distorted perceptions of threat among news consumers.


Cancer Eastern equine encephalitis Health communication Mass media Risk perception 



Dr. Viswanath acknowledges the support of the Dana-Farber Harvard Cancer Center (DFHCC), the Tobacco Research Network on Disparities (TReND), and the Massachusetts Department of Public Health for providing funding for the public opinion survey. The authors would like to thank Howard Koh for comments provided on an earlier draft of the manuscript and Jaclyn Alexander-Molloy for assistance with data extraction and coding.


  1. 1.
    Schwitzer, G., Mudur, G., Henry, D., Wilson, A., Simbra, M., Sweet, M., et al. (2005). What are the roles and responsibilities of the media in disseminating health information? PLoS Medicine, 2(7), e215.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Viswanath, K., Breen, N., Meissner, H., Moser, R. P., Hesse, B., Steele, W. R., et al. (2006). Cancer knowledge and disparities in the information age. Journal of Health Communication, 11(Suppl 1), 1–17.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Blanchard, D., Erblich, J., Montgomery, G. H., & Bovbjerg, D. H. (2002). Read all about it: The over-representation of breast cancer in popular magazines. Preventive Medicine, 35(4), 343–348.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Frost, K., Frank, E., & Maibach, E. (1997). Relative risk in the news media: A quantification of misrepresentation. American Journal of Public Health, 87(5), 842–845.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pribble, J. M., Goldstein, K. M., Fowler, E. F., Greenberg, M. J., Noel, S. K., & Howell, J. D. (2006). Medical news for the public to use? What’s on local TV news. American Journal of Managed Care, 12(3), 170–176.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Viswanath, K., Blake, K., Meissner, H., Saiontz, N. G., Mull, C., Freeman, C., et al. (2008). Occupational practices and the making of health news: A national survey of US health and medical science journalists. Journal of Health Communication, 13(8), 759–777.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Scheufele, D. A., & Tewksbury, D. (2007). Framing, agenda setting, and priming: The evolution of three media effects models. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 9–20.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dudo, A. D., Dahlstrom, M. F., & Brossard, D. (2007). Reporting a potential pandemic—A risk-related assessment of avian influenza coverage in US newspapers. Science Communication, 28(4), 429–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Menashe, C. L., & Siegel, M. (1998). The power of a frame: An analysis of newspaper coverage of tobacco issues—United States, 1985–1996. Journal of Health Communication, 3(4), 307–325.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kim, S. H., & Willis, L. A. (2007). Talking about obesity: News framing of who is responsible for causing and fixing the problem. Journal of Health Communication, 12(4), 359–376.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rodgers, S., & Thorson, E. (2001). The reporting of crime and violence in the Los Angeles Times: Is there a public health perspective? Journal of Health Communication, 6(2), 169–182.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Andersson, H., & Lundborg, P. (2007). Perception of own death risk. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 34(1), 67–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wilcox, S., & Stefanick, M. L. (1999). Knowledge and perceived risk of major diseases in middle-aged and older women. Health Psychology, 18(4), 346–353.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Reese, S. D., Gandy, O. H., & Grant, A. E. (Eds.). (2001). Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Scheufele, D. A. (1999). Framing theory of media effects. Journal of Communication, 49(1), 103–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cooper, C. P., Burgoon, M., & Roter, D. L. (2001). An expectancy-value analysis of viewer interest in television prevention news stories. Health Communication, 13(3), 227–240.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cooper, C. P., & Roter, D. L. (2000). “If it bleeds it leads”? Attributes of TV health news stories that drive viewer attention. Public Health Reports, 115(4), 331–338.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Witte, K., & Allen, M. (2000). A meta-analysis of fear appeals: Implications for effective public health campaigns. Health Education and Behavior, 27(5), 591–615.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Massachusetts Department of Public Health. (2007). Cancer incidence and mortality in Massachusetts 2000–2004: Statewide report. Boston: Massachusetts Department of Public Health.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Massachusetts Department of Public Health. (2007). Eastern equine encephalitis (EEE) in Massachusetts: An update for health care providers. Boston: Massachusetts Department of Public Health.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chapman, S. (2004). Advocacy for public health: A primer. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 58(5), 361–365.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Altheide, D. (1996). Qualitative media analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Fargen, J. (2006). BMC Moakley Building is cure for cancer treatment woes. Boston Herald, 24(310), 18.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Simpson, A. (2006). Jimmy fund gets record gift. Boston Globe, 270(126), B8.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Fargen, J. (2006). ‘Pray for Sheila:’ Devastated hubby warns of EEE threat. Boston Herald, 24(235), 2.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Smith, S. (2006). Fairhaven man has EEE; 4th case in Mass. Boston Globe, 270(83), B2.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Globe, B. (2006). Encephalitis-carrying mosquitoes found. Boston Globe, 270(20), B2.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Samuels, A. P. (2006). Breast cancer war focuses on blacks: City campaign tries to address disparity. Boston Globe, 270(115), B1.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    North AdamsTranscript. (2006). Free health screenings set in November. North Adams Transcript, October 20, p. 18.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kowalczyk, L. (2006). Projected demand drives a boom in cancer care sites. Boston Globe, 270(104), B1.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Zillmann, D. (2002). Exemplification theory of media influence. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 19–42). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Shoemaker, P., & Reese, S. (1996). Mediating the message: Theories of influences on mass media content. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Frieden, T. R. (2004). Asleep at the switch: Local public health and chronic disease. American Journal of Public Health, 94(12), 2059–2061.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Tanner, A. H. (2004). Agenda building, source selection, and health news at local television stations: A nationwide survey of local television health reporters. Science Communication, 25(4), 350–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Atkin, C. K., Smith, S. W., McFeters, C., & Ferguson, V. (2008). A comprehensive analysis of breast cancer news coverage in leading media outlets focusing on environmental risks and prevention. Journal of Health Communication, 13(1), 3–19.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kitzinger, J., & Reilly, J. (1997). The rise and fall of risk reporting—Media coverage of human genetics research, ‘False Memory Syndrome’ and ‘Mad Cow Disease’. European Journal of Communication, 12(3), 319–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Tichenor, P. J., Donohue, G. A., & Olien, C. N. (1980). Community conflict and the press. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Hachiya, M., Osborne, M., Stinson, C., & Werner, B. G. (2007). Human eastern equine encephalitis in Massachusetts: Predictive indicators from mosquitoes collected at 10 long-term trap sites, 1979–2004. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 76(2), 285–292.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    National Breast Cancer Awareness Month. (2008). Available at Accessed December 12, 2008.
  40. 40.
    American Cancer Society. (2008). The great American health challenge. Available at Accessed December 12, 2008.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Community Health and SustainabilityUniversity of Massachusetts LowellLowellUSA
  2. 2.Department of Society, Human Development, and HealthHarvard School of Public HealthBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations