Community-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Trials with Multi-Ethnic Groups: A Systematic Review
- 324 Downloads
The objective of this review was to summarize the current literature of community-based colorectal cancer screening randomized controlled trials with multi-ethnic groups. The CDC reports 40% of adults do not receive time-appropriate colorectal cancer screening. Although overall screening rates have improved since 2000, disparities remain. Studies examining community characteristics may offer insight into improving screening rates and eliminating disparities. We identified community-based colorectal cancer screening studies using PubMed and Ovid Medline database searches. Inclusion criteria were: community-based, randomized controlled trials; English language; published from 1/2001 to 8/2009; all colorectal cancer screening test interventions recommended in the 2008 “Joint Consensus” report; and study participants from at least two racial/ethnic groups, with not more than 90% representation from one group. There were 29 relevant articles published during 2001–2009; with 15 meeting inclusion criteria. We categorized the final studies (n = 15) into the four categories of Patient mailings (n = 3), Telephone outreach (n = 3), Electronic/multimedia (n = 4), and Counseling/community education (n = 5). Of 15 studies, 11 (73%) demonstrated increased screening rates for the intervention group compared to controls, including all studies (100%) from the Patient mailings and Telephone outreach groups, 4 of 5 (80%) Counseling/community education studies, and 1 of 4 (25%) Electronic/multimedia interventions. Patient choice and tailoring of information were common features of trials that increased screening rates across study categories. Including community-level factors and social context may be useful in future design and evaluation of colorectal cancer interventions to reduce or prevent new cases of colorectal cancer.
KeywordsCommunity-based Colorectal cancer screening Randomized controlled trials Health disparities
The authors gratefully acknowledge Raul Caetano, MD, MPH, PhD for his guidance and conceptual contributions to this manuscript.
- 1.Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Colorectal (Colon) Cancer Trends. Screening rates. Accessed on May 11, 2009, from http://www.cdc.gov/cancer/colorectal/statistics/screening_rates.htm.
- 2.U.S. Cancer Statistics Working Group. (2009). United States Cancer Statistics: 1999–2005 Incidence and Mortality Web-based Report. Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Available at: www.cdc.gov/uscs.
- 3.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2000–2008). Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Survey Data. Atlanta, Georgia: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Accessed at http://apps.nccd.cdc.gov/BRFSS).
- 8.De Jesus, M., Puleo, E., Shelton, R. C., McNeill, L. H., Emmons, K. M. (2009). Factors associated with colorectal cancer screening among a low-income, multiethnic, highly insured population: Does provider’s understanding of the patient’s social context matter? J Urban Health [Epub ahead of print].Google Scholar
- 9.Viswanathan, M., Ammerman. A., Eng, E., Gartlehner, G., Lohr, K. N., Griffith, D., Rhodes, S., Samuel-Hodge, C., Maty, S., Lux, L., Webb, L., Sutton, S. F., Swinson, T., Jackman, A., & Whitener, L. (2004). Community-based participatory research: Assessing the evidence. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 99 (Prepared by RTI—University of North Carolina Evidence-based Practice Center under Contract No. 290-02-0016). AHRQ Publication 04-E022-2. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.Google Scholar
- 12.Medicare Carriers Manual. (2001). Transmittal 1697. Department of Health and Human Services, Health Care Financing Administration.Google Scholar
- 13.Levin, B., Lieberman, D. A., McFarland, B., et al. (2008). Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: A joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. CA Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 58, 130–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. (2008). Accessed May 15, 2009, at http://www.cochrane-handbook.org/.
- 25.Friedman, L. C., Everett, T. E., Peterson, L., Ogbonnaya, K. I., & Mendizabal, V. (2001). Compliance with fecal occult blood test screening among low-income medical outpatients: a randomized controlled trial using a videotaped intervention. Journal of Cancer Education, 16, 85–88.PubMedGoogle Scholar