Journal of Community Health

, Volume 35, Issue 3, pp 249–257 | Cite as

Community Norms, Enforcement of Minimum Legal Drinking Age Laws, Personal Beliefs and Underage Drinking: An Explanatory Model

  • Sharon Lipperman-Kreda
  • Joel W. Grube
  • Mallie J. Paschall
Original paper


Strategies to enforce underage drinking laws are aimed at reducing youth access to alcohol from commercial and social sources and deterring its possession and use. However, little is known about the processes through which enforcement strategies may affect underage drinking. The purpose of the current study is to present and test a conceptual model that specifies possible direct and indirect relationships among adolescents’ perception of community alcohol norms, enforcement of underage drinking laws, personal beliefs (perceived parental disapproval of alcohol use, perceived alcohol availability, perceived drinking by peers, perceived harm and personal disapproval of alcohol use), and their past-30-day alcohol use. This study used data from 17,830 middle and high school students who participated in the 2007 Oregon Health Teens Survey. Structural equations modeling indicated that perceived community disapproval of adolescents’ alcohol use was directly and positively related to perceived local police enforcement of underage drinking laws. In addition, adolescents’ personal beliefs appeared to mediate the relationship between perceived enforcement of underage drinking laws and past-30-day alcohol use. Enforcement of underage drinking laws appeared to partially mediate the relationship between perceived community disapproval and personal beliefs related to alcohol use. Results of this study suggests that environmental prevention efforts to reduce underage drinking should target adults’ attitudes and community norms about underage drinking as well as the beliefs of youth themselves.


Underage drinking Community norms Enforcement of minimum legal drinking age laws Personal beliefs Prevention 


  1. 1.
    Johnston, L. D., O’Malley, P. M., Bachman, J. G., & Schulenberg, J. E. (2008). Monitoring the Future national survey results on adolescents drug use: Overview of key findings, 2007. Bethesda, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse. (NIH publication no. 08–6418).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Miller, T. R., Levy, D. T., Spicer, R. S., & Taylor, D. M. (2006). Societal costs of underage drinking. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 67, 519–528.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    National Research Council Institute of Medicine. (2004). Reducing underage drinking: A collective responsibility. Washington, DC: Committee on Developing a Strategy to Reduce and Prevent Underage Drinking. Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dent, C., Grube, J. W., & Biglan, A. (2005). Community level alcohol availability and enforcement of possession laws as predictors of youth drinking. Preventive Medicine, 40, 355–362.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Paschall, M. J., Grube, J. W., Black, C., & Ringwalt, C. L. (2007). Is commercial alcohol availability related to adolescent alcohol sources and alcohol use? Findings from a multi-level study. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41, 168–174.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wagenaar, A. C., Toomey, T. L., Murray, D. M., Short, B. J., Wolfson, M., & Webb-Jones, R. (1996). Sources of alcohol for underage drinkers. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 57, 325–533.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Forster, J. L., McGovern, P. G., Wagenaar, A. C., Wolfson, M., Perry, C. L., & Anstine, P. S. (1994). The ability of young people to purchase alcohol without age identification in northeastern Minnesota, USA. Addiction, 89, 699–705.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Montgomery, J. M., Foley, K. L., & Wolfson, M. (2006). Enforcing the minimum drinking age: State, local and agency characteristics associated with compliance checks and Cops in Shops programs. Addiction, 101, 223–231.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mosher, J. F., Toomey, T. L., Good, C., Harwood, E., & Wagenaar, A. C. (2002). State laws mandating or promoting training programs for alcohol servers and establishment managers: An assessment of statutory and administrative procedures. Journal of Public Health Policy, 23, 90–113.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wagenaar, A. C., & Wolfson, M. (1995). Deterring sales and provision of alcohol to minors: A study of enforcement in 295 counties in four states. Public Health Reports, 110, 419–427.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wolfson, M., Wagenaar, A. C., & Hornseth, G. W. (1995). Law officers’ views on enforcement of the minimum drinking age: A four-state study. Public Health Reports, 110, 428–438.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lipperman-Kreda, S., & Grube, J. W. (2009). Students’ perception of community disapproval, perceived enforcement of school anti-smoking policy, personal beliefs and their cigarette smoking behaviors: Results from a structural equations modeling analysis. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 11, 531–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive perspective. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Princeton-Hall.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bersamin, M., Paschall, M. J., & Flewelling, R. L. (2005). Ethnic differences in relationships between risk factors and adolescent binge drinking: A national study. Prevention Science, 6, 127–137.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Beyers, J. M., Toumbourou, J. W., Catalano, R. F., Arthur, M. W., & Hawkins, J. D. (2004). A cross-national comparison of risk and protective factors for adolescent substance use: The United States and Australia. Journal of Adolescent Health, 35, 3–15.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hawkins, J. D., Catalano, R. F., & Miller, J. Y. (1992). Risk and protective factors for alcohol and other drug problems in adolescence and early adulthood: Implications for substance abuse prevention. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 64–105.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nation, M., & Heflinger, C. A. (2006). Risk factors for serious alcohol and drug use: The role of psychosocial variables in predicting the frequency of substance use among adolescents. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 32, 415–433.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Perry, C. L., Williams, C. L., Komro, K. A., Veblen-Mortenson, S., Forster, J. L., Bernstein-Lachter, R., et al. (2002). Project Northland high school interventions: Community action to reduce adolescent alcohol use. Health Education and Behavior, 27, 29–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Toomey, T. L., & Wagenaar, A. C. (2002). Environmental policies to reduce college drinking: Options and research findings. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 14(Suppl.), 193–205.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2007). Youth Risk Behavior Survey [document on the internet]. [cited 2008 August 26]. Available from:
  21. 21.
    Washington State Department of Health. (2006). Washington State Healthy Youth Survey [document on the internet]. [cited 2008 August 26]. Available from:
  22. 22.
    Bentler, P. M. (1985–2004). EQS for windows, 6.1. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equations Modeling, 6, 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In S. Leinhardt (Ed.), Sociological Methodology 1982 (pp. 290–312). Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Maxwell, S. E., & Cole, D. A. (2007). Bias in cross-sectional analyses of longitudinal mediation. Psychological Methods, 12, 23–44.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sharon Lipperman-Kreda
    • 1
  • Joel W. Grube
    • 1
  • Mallie J. Paschall
    • 1
  1. 1.Prevention Research CenterPacific Institute for Research and EvaluationBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations