Journal of Community Health

, Volume 34, Issue 4, pp 239–245

Public Policy Involvement by Health Commissioners

  • Amy Thompson
  • Debra Boardley
  • Dianne Kerr
  • Tiffany Greene
  • Melissa Jenkins
Original Paper

Abstract

The purpose of this national study was to determine advocacy activities and level of involvement of health commissioners regarding public policy. Benefits, barriers, and perceived outcomes of advocacy efforts were also explored. A previously validated (Holtrop et al., Am J Health Behav 24(2):132–142, 2000) four-page survey was mailed to 700 health commissioners, who were randomly selected from the National Association of County and City Health Officials (NACCHO) database. A three-wave mailing was performed which yielded a 50% response rate. Of these respondents, the majority (70%) were female and (88%) Caucasian. Overall, 31% of health commissioners reported being involved in influencing public policy in the last 4 years. The most common reported activities engaged in by health commissioners included voting (84%), and providing policy information to consumers or other professionals (77%). Perceived barriers to influencing policy were time, (64%), and other priorities (46%). Perceived benefits to influencing policy included improving the health of the public (94%) and making a difference in others’ lives (87%). Only 15% perceived their knowledge regarding the process of changing public policy was excellent. Although health commissioners are often spokespersons for health agencies and communities, their public policy involvement is marginal. Professional preparation programs and continuing education opportunities should focus on advocacy, public policy development, and removing barriers to action.

Keywords

Policy Advocacy Health commissioners 

References

  1. 1.
    US Department of Health and Human Services. (2003). A public health action plan to prevent heart disease and stroke. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Steckler, A., & Dawson, L. (1982). The role of health education in public policy development. Health Education Quarterly, 9, 275–292.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    American Public Health Association Advocacy Webpage. (2008). Accessed February 21, 2008, http://www.apha.org/advocacy/activities/.
  4. 4.
    Gebbie, K., Rosenstock. L. Hernandez, L. (2003). Who will keep the public healthy? Educating public health professionals for the 21st century. National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Holtrop, J., Price, J., & Boardley, D. (2000). Public policy involvement by health educators. American Journal of Health Behavior, 24(2), 132–142.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Oden, L., Price, J., Alteneder, R., Boardley, D., & Ubokudom, S. (2000). Public policy involvement by nurse practitioners. Journal of Community Health, 25(2), 139–155.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    National Association of County and City Health Officials Homepage. (2008). Accessed April 20, 2008, www.naccho.org.
  8. 8.
    National Association of County and City Health Officials Public Health Advocacy Webpage. (2008). Accessed April 20, 2008 http://capwiz.com/naccho/home.
  9. 9.
    Summers, J., & Price, J. (1997). Increasing return rates to a mail survey among health educators. Psychological Reports, 81, 551–554.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    King, K., Pealer, L., & Bernard, A. (2001). Increasing response rates to mail questionnaires: A review of inducement strategies. American Journal of Health Education, 32(1), 4–15.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    United States Census Data. (2006). Accessed February 21, 2008, www.census.gov/prod/2006pubs/p20-556.pdf.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amy Thompson
    • 1
  • Debra Boardley
    • 1
  • Dianne Kerr
    • 2
  • Tiffany Greene
    • 2
  • Melissa Jenkins
    • 2
  1. 1.The University of Toledo, Health and Human ServicesToledoUSA
  2. 2.Kent State UniversityKentUSA

Personalised recommendations