Advertisement

Journal of Community Health

, Volume 32, Issue 5, pp 357–374 | Cite as

Connecting Environmental Health Data To People And Policy: Integrating Information And Mobilizing Communities For Environmental Public Health Tracking

  • Robbie Ali
  • David Wheitner
  • Evelyn O. Talbott
  • Jeanne V. Zborowski
Article

Abstract

Evaluation of available data is a critical preliminary step in the assessment of local environmental health. As part of a multi-organizational initiative to improve environmental health in the Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania region, the University of Pittsburgh Center for Healthy Environments and Communities (CHEC) interviewed 70 experts in the academic, government, non-profit, and private sectors and reviewed print and electronic resources to characterize environmental and public health data available in the region. The objectives of this undertaking were: to provide a conceptual framework for categorizing data locally on environmental hazards, exposures and health endpoints, to describe and evaluate the types of environmental public health data available nationally and locally, to identify existing endeavors to gather and categorize such data, and to present case studies on the real-life relevance of the availability or lack of availability of environmental health data. The purpose and relevance of this project, the evolution of the methodology, successes and challenges met, and anticipated next steps are presented. This process description and resulting comprehensive report is available to communities, at both the state and local health department level as well as lay community members, engaged in similar endeavors, to characterize their local and regional environmental health landscape. The framework outlined serves as background for a related statewide environmental health project sponsored by the Pennsylvania Department of Health through the Pennsylvania Consortium on Interdisciplinary Environmental Policy (PCIEP) and potentially as a foundation for community-based data evaluation for the National Environmental Public Health Tracking Program.

Keywords

environment public health tracking data inventory community 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to acknowledge the Heinz Endowments for their financial support of this project and the Centers for Disease Control for funding of the University of Pittsburgh Academic Partner for Excellence in Environmental Public Health Tracking (5U19EH000103-02).

References

  1. 1.
    U.S. Centers for Disease Control CDC’s Strategy for the National Environmental Public Health Tracking Program 2005–2010. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/nceh/tracking/pdfs/strategy.pdf. 2004Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ritz B, Tager I, Balmes J. Can lessons learned from public health disease surveillance be applied to environmental public health tracking? Environmental Health Perspectives 2005; 113:243–249PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists. National assessment of epidemiologic capacity in public health: findings and recommendations. Available: http://www.cste.org/pdffiles/ecacover1.pdf. 2004 [accessed 7 June 2005]Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    U.S. Centers for Disease Control. Assessment of epidemiologic capacity in state and territorial health departments—United States, 2004. Available: http://www.cdc.gov [accessed 9 June 2005]Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    McGeehen MA, Qualters JR, Niskar AS. National environmental public health tracking program: bridging the information gap. Environmental Health Perspectives 2004; 112:1409–1413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Public Health Foundation. Environmental health data needs: an action plan for federal public health agencies. Available: http://web.health.gov/environment/ehpcrepts.htm. 1997 [accessed 10 March 2005]Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Litt J, Tran N, Malecki KC, Neff R, Resnick B, Burke T. Identifying priority health conditions, environmental data, and infrastructure needs: a synopsis of the Pew Environmental Health Tracking Project. Environ Health Perspect 2004; 112:1414–1418PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Knorr RS, Condon SK, Dwyer FM, Hoffman DF. Tracking pediatric asthma: the Massachusetts experience using school health records. Environ Health Perspect 2004; 112:1424–1427PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Laflamme DM, VanDerslice JA. Using the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) for exposure tracking: Experiences from Washington State. Environ Health Perspect 2004; 112:1428–1433PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Glad JA, Kotchian SB, Barron GM. Developing a local comprehensive environment and health tracking system: using what we know to improve health and the environment. J Environ Health 2004;66:9–14, 28PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    U.S. Centers for Disease Control. Collection of presentations from Vision to Reality: Second Annual Environmental Public Health Tracking Conference. Available: http://www.cdc.gov/nceh/tracking/conf05/presentations.htm. 2005b [accessed 8 June 2005]Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Verkasalo PK, Kokki E, Pukkala E, Vartiainen T, Kiviranta H, Penttinen A, Pekkanen J. Cancer risk near a polluted river in Finland. Environ Health Perspect 2004; 112:1026–1031PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nuckols JR, Ward MH, Jarup L. Using geographic information systems for exposure assessment in environmental epidemiology studies. Environ Health Perspect 2004; 112:1007–1015PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Thacker SB, Stroup DF, Parrish RG, Anderson HA. Surveillance in environmental public health: issues, systems, and sources. American Journal of Public Health 1996; 86:633–638PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bailey, T. Building community capacity to use information: four training options from the experience of the National Neighborhood Indicators Partnership. 2000; Available: http://urban.org/nnip/ [accessed 7 June 2005]Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ali, R and D. Weitner. Environmental Health in the Pittsburgh Region: Toward an Assessment of the Current State of Information. 2004; available at http://www.chec.pitt.edu/stateofinfo/Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Environmental Defense. Scorecard.org website. Available: http://www.scorecard.org. 2004a [accessed 11 July 2005]Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Environmental Defense. Which pollution sources are covered by TRI? Available: http://www.scorecard.org/general/tri/tri_source.html. 2004b [accessed 10 November 2004]Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) and factors to consider when using TRI data. Available: http://www.epa.gov/tri/2002_tri_brochure.pdf. 2002 [accessed 10 January 2005]Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pennsylvania State Data Center. Pennsylvania Spatial Data Access site. Available: http://www.pasda.psu.edu/. 2005l [accessed 11 July 2005]Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Family League of Baltimore City, Inc. Baltimore City Data Collaborative website. Available: http://www.baltimorekidsdata.org. 2005; [accessed 11 July 2005]Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Howell EM, Pettit KLS, Ormond BA, Kingsley GT. Using the National Neighborhood Indicators Partnership to improve public health. J Public Health Management Practice 2003;9:235–242Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kingsley, GT, Ed. Building and operating neighborhood indicator systems: a guidebook. Available: http://urban.org/nnip/. 1999. [accessed 7 June 2005]Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tatian, P. Indispensable information: data collection and information management for healthier communities. Available: http://urban.org/nnip/. 2000. [accessed 7 June 2005]Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    World Health Organization. Draft definition developed at a WHO consultation in Sofia, Bulgaria. 1993Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Leuf, B and Cunningham, W. The Wiki project website. Available: http://www.wiki.org. 2005. [accessed 11 July 2005]Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Institute of Medicine. The Future of Public Health. Washington, D.C. National Academy Press 1998Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Pew Commission Environmental Health Tracking Project Team. America’s Environmental Health Gap: Why the country needs a nationwide health-tracing network. Technical report. Baltimore, MD, John Hopkins School of Hygiene and Public Health, Department of Health Policy and Management. Available: http://healthyamericans.org/reports/files/healthgap.pdf 2000. (accessed 27 February 2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robbie Ali
    • 1
  • David Wheitner
    • 1
  • Evelyn O. Talbott
    • 2
  • Jeanne V. Zborowski
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Behavioral and Community Health SciencesUniversity of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public HealthPittsburghUSA
  2. 2.Department of EpidemiologyUniversity of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public HealthPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations