Advertisement

Journal of Community Health

, Volume 31, Issue 5, pp 430–451 | Cite as

The Differing Views on Insanity of Two Nineteenth Century Forensic Psychiatrists

  • Allen D. Spiegel
  • Florence Kavaler
Article

Abstract

Dr. Charles H. Nichols and Dr. John P. Gray were the two foremost forensic psychiatrists in the latter half of the nineteenth century in the U.S. However, their rationales differed dramatically. They were involved in four notable murder trials where insanity issues arose: one was a trial for the murderer of a Union officer during the Civil War; in another, a conspirator was tried for the assassination of President Abraham Lincoln; in the third, a temporary insanity plea was supported by a medical expert for the first time in a U.S. courtroom; and the fourth was the trial of the assassin of President James A. Garfield. Pointedly, their differing viewpoints still remain controversial today.

Keywords

Abraham Lincoln insanity expert medical opinion murder assassination 

References

  1. 1.
    Gray JP (1871) Insanity: Its Dependence on Physical Disease. Roberts, Utica, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Prichard JC (1835) A Treatise on Moral Insanity and Other Diseases Affecting the Mind. Sherwood, and Piper, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Obituary of Charles H. Nichols. American Journal of Insanity 1888–1890; 46: 416–422.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wilson JG, Fiske J, Klos SL (1889) Appleton’s Cylopedia of American Biography. D. Appleton & Co., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tucker WG. Memoir of John P. Gray. Trans Med Soc State New York Syracuse: Prentis & Benders, 1888, pp. 541–544.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Waldinger RJ (1979) Sleep of reason: John P. Gray and the challenge of moral insanity. J Hist Med Allied Sci 34(2): 163–179PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Presidential Papers Microfilm. Abraham Lincoln Papers Washington, DC: Library of Congress, 1959, Nos. 25985, 26202, 25256, 27295, 27297, 27303, 27368, 26178, 27291, 26018.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    U.S. War Records Office. War of the Rebellion, Washington, DC: Govt. Printing Office, 1884, 1889, 2:6, 106Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dain N, Carlson ET (1962) Moral insanity in the U.S. Am J Psychiat 118(9): 795–801PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gray JP (1865–1866) The trial of Mary Harris. Am J Insanity 22(3): 333–369Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gray JP (1864) The case of Dr. David M. Wright for the murder of Lieutenant Sanborn - plea insanity. Am J Insanity 20:284–300Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Execution of Dr. Wright. New York Herald October 25, 1863.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Basler RP. The Collected Works of Abraham Lincoln New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1953, pp. 6:429, 362, 335–340, 414, 23, 5:356, 7:49, 6:530, 532.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Safe in Dixie. Daily Examiner (Richmond. VA) October 28, 1863.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Porter MW (1949) The Surgeon In Charge. Rumford Press, Concord, NH, p. 27Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Testimony Concerning Lewis Payne: Dr. Charles H. Nichols and Dr. James C. Hall. http://www.surratt.org
  17. 17.
    Kaye NS (1990) Feigned insanity in nineteenth century American legal cases: Tactics, trials and truth. Behavioral Science and the Law 8:3–26Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Argument in Defense of Lewis Powell By W.E. Doster, Esq. http://www.law.umke.edu.
  19. 19.
    Clephane JO. Official Report of the Trial of Mary Harris Indicted for the Murder of Adoniram J. Burroughs. Washington, DC: WH and OH Morrison, 1865, pp. 101-105, 74, 24, 17, 23, 180, 72, 79, 191.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Parsons RL (1867) Review of the trial of Mary Harris for the murder of Adoniram J. Burroughs. Q J Psychol Med and Medical Jurisprudence 1: 186–212Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Proceedings of the 21st Annual Meeting, Association of Medical Superintendents of American Institutions for the Insane. Philadelphia, Pa., May 25, 1867. Am J Insanity 1867–1868; 21–22: 126.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ray I (1866–1867) The insanity of women produced by desertion or seduction. Am J Insanity 23: 263–274Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ray I (1838) A Treatise on the Medical Jurisprudence of Insanity. William D. Tichnor and Co., BostonGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Proceedings of the Annual Meeting, Association of Medical Superintendents of American Institutions for the Insane, April 24, 1866. Am J Insanity 1866–1867; 23: 91–97.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Personal conversation with Robert Vasnicka, National Archives and Records Administration, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Personal correspondence with Dr. Zigmond M. Lebenshon, Washington, DC re his notes on Mary Harris.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Fullinwider SP (1975) Insanity as the loss of self The morsal insanity controversy revisited. Bull Hist Med 49: 87–101PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Pasewark RA, Parnell B, Rock J (1994) Insanity defense: Shifting the burden of proof. J Police Crim Psych 10: 1–4Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Schaefer MN, Bloom JD (2005) The use of the insanity defense as a jail diversion for mentally ill persons charged with misdemeanors. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 33: 79–84PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Carlson ET, Coll BD, Rosenberg CE (1973) The United States vs Charles J. Guiteau 2 Volumes. Arno Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rosenberg CE. The Trial of the Assassin Guiteau. Psychiatry and the Law in the Gilded Age University of Chicago Press, 1968, pp. 90–91, 150–151, 188–189.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Gray JP (1881–1882) Review of the trial of Charles J. Guiteau. Am J Insanity 38: 303–418Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Godding WW (1882) Two Hard Cases. Sketches from a Physician’s Portfolio. Houghton, Mifflin & Co., Boston, p. 188.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Lamb DS (1882) Official report of the post-mortem examination of the body of Charles J. Guiteau. Medical News 41: 43–45Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Arnold JWS, Shakespeare EO, McConnell JC (1882) Official report of the microscopical examination of the brain of Charles J. Guiteau. Medical News 41: 297–299Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Clark JC (1993) The Murder of James A. Garfield Jefferson. McFarland & Co., NC, pp. 18, 144Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Assault upon Dr. Gray. Am J Insanity 1881–1882; 38: 465–467.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Dr. John P. Gray and the Guiteau case. Am J Psychiatry 1955; 111: 704–705.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Winslow F (2005) The Plea of Insanity, In Criminal Cases. The Lawbook Exchange, Ltd., Clark, NJGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Bonnie R. The Insanity Plea Patriot Ledger (Quincy, MA), March 12, 2005.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Kirwin B (2005) The Mad, the Bad, and the Innocent. Little, Brown, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Bok C. Editorial Cartoon About Tom DeLay. Www.cartoongroup.com.October 23, 2005.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Preventive Medicine and Community HealthState University of New York, Downstate Medical Center, College of MedicineBrooklynUSA

Personalised recommendations