Journal of Community Health

, Volume 31, Issue 2, pp 84–93 | Cite as

Use of postpartum health services in rural uganda: knowledge, attitudes and barriers

  • Sarah K. Nabukera
  • Kim Witte
  • Charles Muchunguzi
  • Francis Bajunirwe
  • Vincent K. Batwala
  • Edgar M. Mulogo
  • Celeste Farr
  • Souleymane Barry
  • Hamisu M. Salihu
Article

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to explore the knowledge, attitudes and barriers to use of postpartum care service among rural communities in Uganda. Study was a part of a larger reproductive health evaluation project, and was cross-sectional in nature utilizing qualitative research methods using the narrative inquiry. Two matched rural communities were used in this study; Semuto in Luwero district, and Lwamaggwa in Rakai district. Fifty key informants who were purposefully selected from each study site were interviewed. They included community leaders, political leaders, health care providers, women leaders and community members. One-on-one interviews were conducted with key community informants using an interview guide. The purpose of the interview was explained to each participant, and written informed consent was obtained before the start of the interview. Respondents were allowed to express their views, opinions and observations on several health issues including postpartum health care services. There was a low level of knowledge about postpartum care services among the respondents of the two communities. There was lack of awareness about postpartum care and it’s benefits. The main barriers to use of services were; misconceptions regarding the importance of postpartum care, distance to health facilities, poverty, and health system factors notably; poor facilities, lack of essential drugs, and poor attitudes of health workers. In the effort to improve reproductive health care services, there is an urgent need to improve postpartum services, and make them more accessible and user friendly. The training of providers at all levels is essential, in addition to educating families on the importance of postpartum care services.

Key words

barriers postpartum care rural areas Uganda utilization. 

References

  1. 1.
    Li XF, Fortney JA, Kotelchuck M, Glover LH (1996) The postpartum period: the key to maternal mortality. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 54:1–10PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ahmad K (2000) Women suffer first from lack of health care services. Lancet 356:1085PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zishiri C, Shodu LK, Tshimanga M, Nyirongo L. (1999) Postnatal maternal morbidity patterns in mothers delivering in Gweru City (Midlands Province). Cent Afr J Med 45:234–239PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Thaddeus S, Maine D (1994) Too far to walk: maternal mortality in context. Soc Sci Med 38:1091–1110PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Goodbarn EA, Gazi R, Chowdhury M (1995) Beliefs and practices regarding delivery and post partum maternal morbidity in rural Bangladesh. Stud Fam Plann 26:22–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Finger WR (1997) Better postpartum care saves lives. Network 17:18–21PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Report on maternal and newborn health. Available from URL http://www.who.int/reproductive-health/MNBH/index.htm
  8. 8.
    Prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV (PMTCT): checklist for developing a supply management strategy. Available from URL http://www.unaids.org
  9. 9.
    Bick DE, MacArthur C (1995) Attendance, content and relevance of the six-week postnatal examination. Midwifery 11(2):53–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Baldo MH, Al-Mazrou YY, Aziz KM, Farag MK, Al-Shehri SN (1995) Coverage and quality of natal and postnatal care: women’s perception, Saudi Arabia. J Trop Pediatr 41(S1):30–37PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sibanda JQ, Saungweme I, Nleya C, Mutyambizi MP, Rutgers RA (2001) Postnatal care in Bubi district deserves more attention. Cent Afr J Med 47:103–108PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chakraborty N, Islam MA, Chowdhury RS, Bari W (2002) Utilization of postnatal care in Bangledesh: evidence from a longitudinal study. Health Soc Care Community 10:492–502PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Uganda Demographic and Health Survey 2000–2001, pp. 120–121Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sserunjogi L, Scheutz F, Whyte SR (2003) Postnatal anemia: neglected problems and missed opportunities in Uganda. Health Policy Plan 18:225–231PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gennaro S, Dugyi E, Doud JM, Kershbaumer R (2002) Health promotion for childbearing women in Rubanda, Uganda. J Perinat Neonat Nurs 16:39–50Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Uganda Ministry of Health. Policy for the reduction of mother to child HIV transmission in Uganda. July 2001Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nabukera S, Witte K, Bajunirwe F, et al. Evaluation of DISH II Special Interventions. Uganda; 2002. Final ReportGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schensul S, Schensul JJ, Lecompte MD (1999) Essential ethnographic methods; ethnographers toolkit vol 2. Altamira Press, Walnut CreekGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Stock R. (1983) Distance and utilization of health facilities in rural Nigeria. Soc Sci Med 24:563–570CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sarah K. Nabukera
    • 1
  • Kim Witte
    • 2
  • Charles Muchunguzi
    • 3
  • Francis Bajunirwe
    • 3
  • Vincent K. Batwala
    • 3
  • Edgar M. Mulogo
    • 3
  • Celeste Farr
    • 4
  • Souleymane Barry
    • 5
  • Hamisu M. Salihu
    • 6
  1. 1.Department of Maternal & Child HealthUniversity of Alabama at BirminghamBirminghamUSA
  2. 2.Center for Communication ProgramsJohns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreUSA
  3. 3.Mbarara University of Science and TechnologyMbararaUganda
  4. 4.Department of CommunicationsNorth Carolina State UniversityRaleighUSA
  5. 5.Party DISH II ProjectKampalaUganda
  6. 6.University of Alabama at BirminghamBirminghamUSA

Personalised recommendations