Risk Factors for Intimate Partner Violence and Associated Injury Among Urban Women
- 900 Downloads
The objective of this study was to identify risk factors for abuse and IPV related injury among an urban population. This study reports an additional analysis of a case-control study conducted from 1994 to 2000 in 11 USA metropolitan cities where of 4746 women, 3637 (76.6%) agreed to participate. Control group women (N = 845) were identified through random digit dialing. Significant risk factors for abuse included women’s young age (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 2.05 p = .011), being in fair or poor mental health (AOR 2.65 p < .001), and former partner (AOR 3.33 p < .001). Risk factors for partners perpetrating IPV included not being a high school graduate (AOR 2.06 p = .014), being in fair or poor mental health (AOR 6.61 p < .001), having a problem with drug (AOR 1.94 p = .020) or alcohol use (AOR 2.77 p = .001), or pet abuse (AOR 7.59 p = .011). College completion was observed to be protective (AOR 0.60, p < .001). Significant risk factors for injury included partner’s fair or poor mental health (AOR 2.13, p = .008), suicidality (AOR 2.11, p = .020), controlling behavior (AOR 4.31, p < .001), prior domestic violence arrest (AOR 2.66, p = .004), and relationship with victim of more than 1 year (AOR 2.30, p = .026). Through integration of partner related risk factors into routine and/or targeted screening protocols, we may identify more abused women and those at greater risk of abuse and injury.
Keywords:women intimate partner violence
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
This work was supported in part by funding from the National Institute on drug Abuse, K23 DA13955. The study was supported by joint funding from the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, the National Institute on Drug Abuse, the National Institute of Mental Health, the National Institutes on Aging, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the National Institute of Justice. Grant Support: R01 DA/AA11156 “Risk factors for Homicide in Violent Intimate Relationships.” (Campbell, PI). Additional funding was obtained from the Collins Foundation to assist in the collection of data from one of the 6 cities and from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for collection of the data on the nonabused controls (S, Wilt, PI). We would like to thank all of the participants in the study a well as all of the co-investigators: Daniel Webster, ScD, MPH, Phyllis Sharps, PhD, RN, Janet Schollenberger, MHS, and Kathryn Laughon, PhD, also from Johns Hopkins University, as well as Jane Koziol-McLain, PhD, RN, Carolyn Block, PhD, Doris Campbell, PhD, RN, Mary Ann Curry, PhD, RN, Faye Gary, PhD, RN, Nancy Glass, PhD, MPH, RN, Judith McFarlane, PhD, RN, Carolyn Sachs, MD, MPH, Yvonne Ulrich, PhD, RN, Susan A. Wilt, DrPH, and Xiao Xu, PhD, RN.
- 1.Tjaden, PJ, Thoennes, N 2000Full Report of the Prevalence, Incidence, and Consequences of Violence Against Women: Findings from the National Violence Against Women SurveyNational Institute of JusticeWashington, D.C.NCJ-183781Google Scholar
- 3.Rennison CM. Intimate partner violence, 1993–2001. Bureau of Justice Statistics Crime Data Brief. February 2003, NCJ 197838. http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs. Accessed 9-12-03
- 5.Rand MR. Violence-related injuries treated in hospital emergency departments. Bureau of Justice Statistics, Special Report. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, August 1997Google Scholar
- 6.Saltzmann, LE, Fanslow, JL, McMahon, PM, Shelley, GA 1999Intimate Partner Violence Surveillance: Uniform Definitions and Recommended Data Elements, Version 1.0National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease PreventionAtlanta, GAGoogle Scholar
- 9.The Commonwealth Fund. Health Concerns across a Woman’s Lifespan1999The Commonwealth Fund 1998 Survey of Women’s HealthCommonwealth fundNew YorkGoogle Scholar
- 10.The Commonwealth Fund2004Domestic Violence Prevention Evaluation ReportCommonwealth fundNew YorkGoogle Scholar
- 11.Campbell, JC, Webster, D, Koziol-McLain, J, Block, C, Campbell, D, Curry, MA, Gary, F, Glass, N, McFarlane, J, Sachs, C, Sharps, P, Ulrich, Y, Wilt, SA, Manganello, J, Xu, X, Schollenberger, J, Frye, V, Laughon, K 2003Risk factors for femicide in abusive relationships: Results from a multi-site case control studyAm J Public Health9310891097PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 12.Straus, MA 1979Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The conflict tactics scalesJournal of Marriage and the Family417588Google Scholar
- 13.Campbell, JC, Webster, D, Koziol-McLain, J, Block, CR, Campbell, DW, Curry, MA, Gary, FA, McFarlane, J, Sachs, C, Sharps, PW, Ulrich, Y, Wilt, SA 2003Assessing risk factors for intimate partner homicideNIJ Journal2501419Google Scholar
- 14.Campbell, J, McKenna, L, Torres, S, Sheridan, D, Landenburger, K 2003Nursing care of survivors of intimate partner violenceHumphreys, JCCampbell, JC eds. Family Violence in Nursing PracticeLippincott, Williams & WilkinsPhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
- 15.Johnson, H, Sacco, VF 1995Researching violence against women: Statistics Canada’s national surveyCanadian Journal of Criminology37281304Google Scholar
- 16.STATA Version 8.0. Stata Corporation 2003Google Scholar
- 22.Siegel, RM, Joseph, EC, Routh, SA, Mendel, SG, Jones, E, Ramesh, RB, Hill, TD 2003Screening for domestic violence in the pediatric office: a multipractice experienceClin Pediatr42599602Google Scholar
- 23.Daly, M, Singh, LS, Wilson, M 1993Children fathered by previous partners: A risk factor for violence against womenCanadian J of Public Health84209210Google Scholar
- 24.Daly, M, Wiseman, KA, Wilson, M 1997Women and children sired by previous partners incur excess risk of uxoricideHomicide Studies16171Google Scholar
- 25.Schafer, J, Caetano, R, Clark, C 1998Rates of intimate partner violence in the United StatesAm J of Public Health8817021704Google Scholar
- 33.Mechanic, M 2001The impact of severe stalking experienced by acutely battered women: an examination of violence, psychological symptoms and strategic respondingViolence and Victims15443458Google Scholar