EVALUATION OF LITERACY LEVEL OF PATIENT EDUCATION PAGES IN HEALTH-RELATED JOURNALS
- 806 Downloads
- 103 Citations
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reading level of patient education material from selected current health care journals. Ten patient education pages from a variety of health care journals were entered into a Microsoft Word program. Applying the Flesch–Kincaid readability formula available from Microsoft Word, a reading level for each page was established and compared to recommended standards. Only 2 of 10 patient education pages fell within the recommended reading levels for health-related materials, and 5 of 10 were above the estimated mean U.S. reading level of 8th grade. A 5th to 6th grade level is recommended for patient education materials. This study suggests that although it is known that low health literacy is a widespread problem, it is not always considered when patient-targeted materials are developed. Health care professionals need to become more active in addressing the literacy needs of the intended receiver of written health-related information.
Keywords
Literacy patient education readability health informationPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Kirsch, I, Junglut, A, Jenkins, L, Kolstad, A 1993Adult literacy in America: A first look at finding of the National Adult Literacy SurveyNational Center for Education Statistics, US Department of EducationWashington, DCGoogle Scholar
- Bastable, SB 1997Nurse as Educator: Principles of Teaching and LearningJones and Bartlett PublishersSudbury, MAGoogle Scholar
- ad hoc Committee on Health Literacy for the Council on Scientific Affairs1999American Medical Association. Health literacy, report of the council on scientific affairs.JAMA281552557Google Scholar
- Albright, J, Guzman, C, Acebo, P, Paira, S, Faulkner, M, Swanson, J 1996Readability of patient education materials.Appl Nurs Res9139143Google Scholar
- Flesch, RF 1948A new readability yardstick.J Appl Phys32221233Google Scholar
- Weiss, BD, Coyne, C, Michielutte, R, et al. 1998Communicating with patients who have limited literacy skills—Report of the National Work Group on Literacy and Health.J Fam Pract4168176Google Scholar
- Doak, C, Doak, L, Root, J 1996Teaching Patients with Low Literacy SkillsJB LippincottPhiladelphia, PAGoogle Scholar
- Hearth-Holmes, M, Murphy, PW, Davis, TC, et al. 1998Literacy in patients with a chronic disease: Systemic lupus erythematosus and the reading level of patient education materials.J Rheumatol2516491650Google Scholar
- Hosey, GM, Freeman, WL, Stracqualursi, F, Ghodes, D 1990Designing and evaluating diabetes education material for American Indians.Diabetes Educ16407414Google Scholar
- Larson, I, Schumacher, HR 1992Comparison of literacy level of patients in a VA arthritis center with the reading level required by education materials.Arthritis Care Res51316Google Scholar
- Merritt, SL, Gates, MA, Skiba, K 1993Readability levels of selected hypercholesterolemia patient education literature.Heart Lung22415420Google Scholar
- Paasche-Orlow, MK, Taylor, HA, Brancati, FL 2003Readability standards for informed-consent forms as compared with actual readability.NEJM348721726Google Scholar
- Mailoux, SL, Johnson, ME, Fisher, DG, Pettib, TJ 1995How reliable is computerized assessment of readability?Compet Nurs13221225Google Scholar
- Letters. JAMA 1999; 282: 525–527.Google Scholar
- Joint Commission on Accreditation of Health Care Organizations1996Patient and Family Education In: Accreditation Manual for HospitalsJoint Commission on Accreditation of Health Care OrganizationsChicago, ILGoogle Scholar
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services2000Health communication. In Healthy People 2010Public Health ServiceWashington DCGoogle Scholar