Encouraging Gamblers to Think Critically Using Generalised Analytical Priming is Ineffective at Reducing Gambling Biases
Gambling has been associated with an array of fallacious beliefs that foster risky gambling decisions. Research into other belief systems suggests that the endorsement of non-evidence based beliefs, such as the paranormal or conspiracy theories, can be reduced when people think more analytically. The purpose of this study was to explore whether an intervention designed to elicit analytical thinking was effective in altering the gambling beliefs and simulated gambling behaviour of 178 regular electronic gaming machine (EGM) gamblers (102 males, 76 female). Participants were randomly allocated to complete either an analytic or a neutral priming task, followed by completion of belief measures (erroneous and protective) and play on a simulated EGM game. Results failed to show that priming for analytical thinking changed betting on an EGM; including features of bet size, bet change, persistence and theoretical losses. Contrary to expectations, results suggest that priming analytical thinking using generalised interventions does not appear to be effective in altering peoples’ simulated gambling involvement or gambling beliefs. In fact, priming people to think more critically might be counterproductive by contributing to greater positive expectations about gambling outcomes. The results further suggested that the number of times a player alters their bet is a good indicator of theoretical gambling losses and is associated with irrational gambling cognitions. Interventions designed to promote safer thinking in gamblers should be implemented with care, as results from our study suggest that encouraging critical thinking in at-risk or problem gamblers may not be effective in reducing risky gambling.
KeywordsGambling beliefs Analytic prime Gambling intensity Cognitive style
Part of this research was supported under the Commonwealth Government’s Research Training Program/Research Training Scheme. I gratefully acknowledge the financial support provided by the Australian Government and Central Queensland University. Funding agencies have had no involvement in the research design, methodology, conduct, analysis or write-up of this manuscript.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
This research involved human participants and received ethics approval from the Central Queensland Human Research Ethics Committee [Project Number: H16/04-075].
Informed consent was provided by all participants included in the study.
- Armstrong, T., Donaldson, P., Langham, E., Rockloff, M., & Browne, M. (2018). Exploring the effectiveness of an intelligent messages framework for developing warning messages to reduce gambling intensity. Journal of Gambling Issues,38, 67–84. https://doi.org/10.4309/jgi.2018.38.4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Armstrong, T., Rockloff, M., Browne, M., & Blaszczynski, A. (2019). Beliefs about gambling mediate the effect of cognitive style on gambling problems. (unpublished manuscript).Google Scholar
- Bouju, G., Hardouin, J.-B., Boutin, C., Gorwood, P., Le Bourvellec, J.-D., Feuillet, F., et al. (2014). A shorter and multidimensional version of the Gambling Attitudes and Beliefs Survey (GABS-23). Journal of Gambling Studies,30(2), 349–367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-012-9356-3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Davidson, T., & Rodgers, B. (2010). 2009 Survey of the nature and extent of gambling and problem gambling, in the Australian Capital Territory. Canberra: Gambling and Racing Commission. Retrieved Nov, 2019, from https://www.gamblingandracing.act.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/745043/ACT-Gambling-Prevalence-Study.pdf.
- Delfabbro, P. (2004). The stubborn logic of regular gamblers: Obstacles and dilemmas in cognitive gambling research. Journal of Gambling Studies,20(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOGS.0000016701.17146.d0.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Epstein, S. (2008). Intuition from the perspective of cognitive-experiential self-theory. In H. Plessner, C. Betsch, & T. Betsch (Eds.), Intuition in judgement and decision making (pp. 23–37). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Ferris, J., & Wynne, H. (2001). The Canadian Problem Gambling Index: Final report. Ottawa: Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse.Google Scholar
- Friedman, B. (2000). Designing casinos to dominate the competition: The Friedman international standards of casino design. Reno, NV: Institute for the Study of Gambling and Commercial Gaming.Google Scholar
- Gaboury, A., & Ladouceur, R. (1989). Erroneous perceptions and gambling. Journal of Social Perceptions and Gambling,4, 411–420.Google Scholar
- Griffiths, M. D., Parke, A., Wood, R., & Parke, J. (2006). Internet Gambling: An overview of psychosocial impacts. UNVL Gambling Research and Review Journal,10(1), 27–39.Google Scholar
- Hammond, K. R. (1996). Coping with uncertainty: The rivalry between intuition and analysis. In Human Judgement and Social Policy. Retrieved Aug, 2015, from https://books.google.com.au/books?id=Z_DZ3nKHg2cC&dq=human+judgement+and+social+policy&source=gbs_navlinks_s.
- Hare, S. (2006). Factors that influence gambler adherence to pre-commitment decisions. Brisbane: Schottler Consulting for Gambling Research Australia.Google Scholar
- Hare, S. (2009). A study of gambling in Victoria—Problem gambling from a public health perspective August 2008 to October 2009. Victoria: Department of Justice. Retrieved July, 2019, from http://www.responsiblegambling.vic.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0013/4027/Gambling-in-victoria-problem-gambling-from-a-public-health-perspective.pdf.
- Khasawneh, (2011). Thinking style preferences of vocational students at the university level: A prospective workforce development approach. International Journal of Applied Education Studies,10(1), 78–89.Google Scholar
- Kučinskienė, R. (2003). Methodological foundation for rational individual career decision making. Management of Organizations: Systematic Research,25, 139–148.Google Scholar
- Leonard, C. A. (2018). Fallacious beliefs: Gambling specific and belief in the paranormal. Odedeji: University of Lethbridge.Google Scholar
- Miller, N. V., & Currie, S. R. (2008). A Canadian population level analysis of the roles of irrational gambling cognitions and risky gambling practices as correlates of gambling intensity and pathological gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies,24(3), 257–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-008-9089-5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Monaghan, S., & Blaszczynski, A. (2005). Warning signs on electronic gaming machines: Recall and effects on cognitions and beliefs. In Proceedings of the 15th national association for gambling studies conference (pp. 166–186). Alice Springs N.T.Google Scholar
- Oei, T. P. S., Lin, J., & Raylu, N. (2008). The relationship between gambling cognitions, psychological states, and gambling: A cross-cultural study of Chinese and caucasians in Australia. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,39(2), 147–161. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022107312587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Riley-Smith, B., & Binder, J. (2003). Testing of harm minimisation messages for gaming machines. Government of New South Wales: Department of Gaming and Racing.Google Scholar
- Sadler-Smith, E., & Shefy, E. (2004). The intuitive executive: Understanding and applying “gut feel” in decision-making. Academy of Management Language,18(4), 76–91.Google Scholar
- Sadler-Smith, E., Zhang, L.-F., & Sternberg, R. (2009). A duplex model of cognitive style. In Perspectives on the nature of intellectual styles (pp. 3–28). Retrieved from https://books.google.com.au/books?id=6drSmW4AbfEC&pg=PA3&dq=a+duplex+model+of+cognitive+style&hl=en&sa=X&ei=ruUUVbTpLJTW8gWCioGgBg&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
- Sproston, K., Hing, N., & Palankay, C. (2012). Prevalence of gambling and problem gambling in New South Wales. Sydney: NSW Office of Liquor, Gaming and Racing.Google Scholar
- Sundali, J., & Croson, R. (2006). Biases in casino betting: The hot hand and the Gambler’s Fallacy. Judgement and Decision Making,1, 1–12.Google Scholar
- Swami, V., Pietschnig, J., Stieger, S., & Voracek, M. (2011). Alien psychology: Associations between extraterrestrial beliefs and paranormal ideation, superstitious beliefs, schizotypy, and the Big Five personality factors. Applied Cognitive Psychology,25(4), 647–653. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- The Social Research Centre. (2013). Gambling Prevalence in South Australia. Adelaide: Office for Problem Gambling. Retrieved July, 2019, from http://www.problemgambling.sa.gov.au/professionals/news_and_events/news-items/release-of-the-2012-gambling-prevalence-study-in-south-australia/?a=13625.