Problem Gambling in Greece: Prevalence and Risk Factors During the Financial Crisis
In Greece no study has ever been conducted on the prevalence of problem gambling. Therefore, a cross-sectional survey was carried out amid the recession aiming to (1) estimate past year prevalence of problem gambling, (2) explore socio-economic and demographic differences among gamblers and non gamblers, (3) explore socio-economic and demographic differences among gamblers who started gambling prior and during the downturn and (4) identify its risk factors with a special interest in the influence of the recession. To this end, data emanating from a telephone and patron survey were combined. A random and representative sample of 3.404 people participated in the telephone survey and 2.400 in the patron survey. The interview schedule was the same in both studies. The presence of problem gambling was assessed with the Canadian Problem Gambling Index. Information on participants’ socio-economic and demographic characteristics as well as their ways of dealing financially with the crisis were collected. Findings indicated that 2.4% of respondents met criteria for problem gambling. Male gender, minority status, living with family of origin, low educational level and low to zero income were found to constitute the risk factors of the disorder. Moreover, having started gambling during the recession increased the odds of suffering from problem gambling; however this finding was gender-specific. Thus, people end up in problem gambling through various pathways, with these trajectories being different for men and women. Any intervention should address the complexity of the issue and be tailored by gender.
KeywordsBehavioural addiction Gambling disorder Epidemiology Financial crisis Gender effect Mental health
The funding was provided by OPAP.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Abbot, M. W., Volberg, R., Bellinger, M., & Ruth, G. (2004a). A review of research on aspects of problem gambling. Final report. Auckland University of Technology: Gambling Research Centre.Google Scholar
- Abbot, M. W., Volberg, R. A., & Ronnberg, S. (2004b). Comparing the New Zealand and Swedish National Surveys of gambling and problem gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 20, 237–258.Google Scholar
- Afifi, T. O., Cox, B. J., Martens, P. J., Sareen, J., & Enns, M. W. (2010). The relation between types and frequency of gambling activities and problem gambling among women in Canada. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry (La Revue Canadienne de Psychiatrie), 55, 21–28.Google Scholar
- Blaszczynski, A., & Nower, L. (2002). A pathways model of problem and pathological gambling. Addiction, 97, 487–499.Google Scholar
- Brooker, I. S., Clara, I. P., & Cox, B. J. (2009). The Canadian Problem Gambling Index: Factor structure and associations with psychopathology in a nationally representative sample. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 41, 109–114.Google Scholar
- Cochran, W. (1977). Sampling techniques. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Ferris, J., & Wynne, H. (2001). The Canadian problem gambling index: User manual.http://www.ccsa.ca/2003%20and%20earlier%20CCSA%20Documents/ccsa-009381-2001.pd.
- Gerstein, D. R., Volberg, R. A., Toce, M. T., & Sinclair, S. (1999). Gambling impact and behavior study: Report to the National Gambling Impact Study Commission. Chicago, IL: National Opinion Research Center at the University of Chicago.Google Scholar
- Horvant, C., & Paap, R. (2012). The effect of recessions on gambling expenditures. Journal of Gambling Studies, 28, 703–717.Google Scholar
- Jackson, A. C., Wynne, H., Dowling, N. A., Tomnay, J. E., & Thomas, S. A. (2009). Using the CPGI to determine problem gambling prevalence in Australia: Measurement issues. International Journal of Mental Health & Addiction, 8, 572–580.Google Scholar
- Johansson, A., Grant, J. E., Won Kim, S., et al. (2009). Risk factors for problematic gambling: A critical literature review. Journal of Gambling Studies, 25, 67–92.Google Scholar
- Kalischuk, R. G., Nowatzki, N., Cardwell, K., Klein, K., & Solowoniuk, J. (2006). Problem gambling and its impact on families: A literature review. International Journal of Gambling Studies, 6, 31–60.Google Scholar
- Ladouceur, R., Sylvain, C., Boutin, C., & Doucet, C. (2002). Understanding and treating the pathological gambler. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Lessler, J., & Kalsbeek, W. (1992). Nonsampling error in surveys. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Loo, J. M. Y., Oei, T. P., & Raylu, N. (2011). Problem gambling, gambling correlates, and help-seeking attitudes in a chinese sample: An empirical evaluation. Psychology, 2, 342–354.Google Scholar
- Lyons, C. A. (2013). Gambling in the public marketplace: Adaptations to economic context. Psychological Record, 63, 309–322.Google Scholar
- Marshall, Μ. (2009). Gambling as a public health issue: The critical role of the local environment. Journal of Gambling Issues, 23, 66–80.Google Scholar
- McMillen, J., & Wenzel, M. (2006). Measuring problem gambling: Assessment of three prevalence screens. International Gambling Studies, 6(2), 147–174.Google Scholar
- Orford, J., Wardle, H., Griffiths, M., Sproston, K., & Erens, B. (2010). The role of social factors in gambling: Evidence from the 2007 British Gambling Prevalence Survey. Community, Work & Family, 13, 257–271.Google Scholar
- Schissel, B. (2001). Betting against youth: The effects of socio-economic marginality on gambling among young people. Youth & Society, 32, 473–491.Google Scholar
- Volberg, R. A. (2002). The epidemiology of pathological gambling. Psychiatric Annals, 32, 171–178.Google Scholar
- Wiebe, J., & Volberg, R. A. (2007). Problem gambling prevalence research: A critical overview. A report to the Canadian Gaming Association. Toronto: Canadian Gaming Association.Google Scholar
- Williams, R. J., & Volberg, R. A. (2009). Impact of survey description, administration format, and exclusionary criteria on population prevalence rates of problem gambling. International Gambling Studies, 9, 101–117.Google Scholar