Feasibility of Brief Screening for At-Risk Gambling in Consumer Credit Counseling
- 111 Downloads
Gambling disorder and problem gambling often lead to major suffering in the form of mental health problems, interpersonal conflict, and financial crises. One potential setting for detecting at-risk gambling is credit counseling as gambling problems may manifest themselves in the form of financial distress and bankruptcy. Research studies have not considered those seeking credit counseling as individuals at risk for gambling problems even though gambling may contribute to financial distress. Therefore, the current study sought to quantify the prevalence of at-risk gambling in credit counseling compared with national estimates, to compare at-risk gamblers in this population to lower risk individuals, and to assess the feasibility of gambling screening in these settings. Using a mixed methods approach, the current study found that almost 20% of callers to a national agency reported gambling behavior, and among those who gambled, they reported higher rates of problems related to gambling than the broader U.S. population, thus supporting the idea that screening in credit counseling may help identify those at risk. Low risk gamblers were slightly younger than non-gamblers, but no other differences in sociodemographic and financial status variables were found based on gambling risk status. Results from focus groups and individual interviews suggest that credit counselors and program administrators see the benefit to brief screening within their intake and counseling processes. Our findings suggest that gambling screening is feasible in consumer credit counseling and may be acceptable to staff and administrators at these agencies.
KeywordsGambling disorder At-risk gambling Consumer credit counseling Brief biosocial gambling screen Debt
This study was funded by a Seed Grant from the National Council on Responsible Gaming awarded in 2017.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
- Barbosa, C., Cowell, A., Bray, J., & Aldridge, A. (2015). The cost-effectiveness of alcohol screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) in emergency and outpatient medical settings. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 53, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2015.01.003.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Barbosa, C., Cowell, A., Dowd, W., Landwehr, J., Aldridge, A., & Bray, J. (2017). The cost-effectiveness of brief intervention versus brief treatment of Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) in the United States. Addiction, 112, 73–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.13658.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Black, D. W., Coryell, W., Crowe, R., McCormick, B., Shaw, M., & Allen, J. (2015). Suicide ideations, suicide attempts, and completed suicide in persons with pathological gambling and their first-degree relatives. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 45(6), 700–709. https://doi.org/10.1111/sltb.12162.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. (2017). What’s the difference between a credit counselor and a debt settlement company? https://www.consumerfinance.gov/ask-cfpb/whats-the-difference-between-a-credit-counselor-and-a-debt-settlement-company-en-1449/. Accessed 29 October 2017.
- Cunningham-Williams, R. M., Grucza, R. A., Cottler, L. B., Womack, S. B., Books, S. J., Przybeck, T. R., et al. (2005). Prevalence and predictors of pathological gambling: Results from the St. Louis personality, health and lifestyle (SLPHL) study. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 39(4), 377–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gainsbury, S., Blankers, M., Wilkinson, C., Schelleman-Offermans, K., & Cousijn, J. (2014a). Recommendations for international gambling harm-minimisation guidelines: Comparison with effective public health policy. Journal of Gambling Studies, 30(4), 771–788. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-013-9389-2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gebauer, L., Labrie, R., Shaffer, H. J., Gebauer, L., LaBrie, R., & Shaffer, H. J. (2010). Optimizing DSM-IV-TR classification accuracy: a brief biosocial screen for detecting current gambling disorders among gamblers in the general household population. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 55(2), 82–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gerstein, D., Hoffman, J., Larison, C., Engelman, L., Murphy, S., Palmer, A., et al. (1999). Gambling impact and behavior study (p. 168). New York, NY: National Gambling Impact Study Commission.Google Scholar
- Grant, B. F., Kaplan, K., Shepard, J., & Moore, T. (2003). Source and accuracy statement for wave 1 of the 2001–2002 national epidemiologic survey on alcohol and related conditions. Bethesda, MD: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism.Google Scholar
- Grieco, E. M., & Cassidy, R. C. (2001). Overview of race and hispanic origin. In U.S. Census Bureau (Ed.), Census 2000 briefs. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.Google Scholar
- Horn, B. P., Crandall, C., Forcehimes, A., French, M. T., & Bogenschutz, M. (2017). Benefit-cost analysis of SBIRT interventions for substance using patients in emergency departments. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 79, 6–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2017.05.003.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Kaner, E., Beyer, F., Dickinson, H., Pienaar, E., Campbell, F., Schlesinger, C., et al. (2007). Effectiveness of brief alcohol interventions in primary care populations. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2, CD004148.Google Scholar
- Lesieur, H. R., Blume, S. B., Zoppa, R., Cahill, R., Maher, K., Casey, F., et al. (1987). The South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS): A new instrument for the identification of pathological gamblers. American Journal of Psychiatry, 144(9), 1184–1188. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.144.9.1184.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Petry, N. M., Stinson, F. S., & Grant, B. F. (2005). Comorbidity of DSM-IV pathological gambling and other psychiatric disorders: Results from the national epidemiologic survey on alcohol and related conditions. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 66(5), 564–574. https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.v66n0504.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sandelowski, M. (2000). Whatever happened to qualitative description? Research in Nursing & Health, 23(4), 334–340. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-240X(200008)23:4%3c334:AID-NUR9%3e3.0.CO;2-G.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Saunders, J. B., Aasland, O. G., Babor, T. F., De La Fuente, J. R., & Grant, M. (1993). Development of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): WHO collaborative project on early detection of persons with harmful alcohol consumption-II. Addiction, 88(6), 791–804. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.1993.tb02093.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar