Advertisement

Gambling Problem Trajectories and Associated Individuals Risk Factors: A Three-Year Follow-Up Study Among Poker Players

  • Magali DufourEmail author
  • Adèle Morvannou
  • Natacha Brunelle
  • Sylvia Kairouz
  • Émélie Laverdière
  • Louise Nadeau
  • Djamal Berbiche
  • Élise Roy
Original Paper

Abstract

Despite the popularity in poker-related activities in recent years, few studies have focused on the evolution of gambling habits of poker players over a long period of time. The aim of this study is to examine factors influencing trajectories of poker players. The results are based on data collected at a four-time measurement of a prospective cohort study conducted in Quebec (n = 304 poker players). A latent class growth analysis was performed to identify trajectories based on the Problem Gambling Severity Index score. Multinomial multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to determine the correlates of gambling trajectories. Over the 3 years of the study, three gambling problem trajectories were identified, comprising one decreasing trajectory (1st: non-problematic—diminishing), one stable trajectory (2nd: low risk—stable), and one increasing trajectory (3th: problem gamblers—increasing). Internet as the main poker form and number of game played were associated with at-risk trajectories. Depression symptoms were significant predictors of the third trajectory whereas impulsivity predicted the second trajectory. This study shows that the risk is remaining low over years for the vast majority of poker players. However, the vulnerable poker players at the beginning of the study remain on a problematic increasing trajectory. It is therefore important to prioritize individuals in the third trajectory for interventions.

Keywords

Poker Gambling problems Trajectories Prospective cohort study Internet gambling 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank all participants that collaborated in this study and all members of the research team.

Funding

This study was funded by Fonds de recherche du Québec - Société et Culture (FRQSC) (Grant no. 2012-JU-164313).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This research received institutional ethical boards approvals of the Lettres et sciences humaines at the Université de Sherbrooke (2012-17/Dufour/) and the Université du Québec à Trois Rivières (CER-12-182-04.04.01).

References

  1. Abbott, M. W., Williams, M. M., & Volberg, R. A. (2004). A prospective study of problem and regular nonproblem gamblers living in the community. Substance Use and Misuse, 39, 855–884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abdollahnejad, R., Delfabbro, P., & Denson, L. (2015). Personality diroders and erroneous beliefs in pathological gambling. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 13, 376–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barrault, S., & Varescon, I. (2013a). Impulsive sensation seeking and gambling practice among a sample of online poker players. Comparison between non pathological, problem and pathological gamblers. Personality and Individual Differences, 55, 502–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barrault, S., & Varescon, I. (2013b). Cognitive distortions, anxiety, and depression among regular and pathological gambling online poker players. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16, 183–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beck, A. T., Epstein, N., Brown, G., & Steer, R. A. (1988). An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: Psychometric properties. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 893–897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Brown, G. K. (1996). Beck depression inventory manual. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
  7. Bjerg, O. (2010). Problem gambling in poker: Money, rationality and control in a skill-based social game. International Gambling Studies, 10, 239–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bourque, P., & Beaudette, D. (1982). Étude psychométrique du questionnaire de dépression de Beck auprès d’un échantillon d’étudiants universitaires francophones (Psychometric evaluation of the Beck Inventory on a sample of French-speaking university students). Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement, 14, 211–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bradley, C., & Schroeder, R. D. (2009). Because it’s free poker! A qualitative analysis of free Texas Hold’em Poker tournaments. Sociological Spectrum, 29, 401–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brochu, P., Sévigny, S., & Giroux, I. (2015). Raisons de jouer, émotions et perceptions relatives au hasard et à l’habileté́ de joueurs pratiquant le poker Texas Hold’em en ligne. Journal of Gambling Issues, 31, 78–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brosowski, T., Meyer, G., & Hayer, T. (2012). Analyses of multiple types of online gambling within one provider: An extended evaluation framework of actual online gambling behaviour. International Gambling Studies, 12, 405–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Currie, S. R., Hodgins, D. C., Casey, D. M., el-Guebaly, N., Smith, G. J., Williams, R. J., et al. (2012). Examining the predictive validity of low-risk gambling limits with longitudinal data. Addiction, 107, 400–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dowling, N. A., Merkouris, S. S., Greenwood, C. J., Oldenhof, E., Toumbourou, J. W., & Youssef, G. (2017). Early risk and protective factors for problem gambling: A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Clinical Psychology Review, 51, 109–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dufour, M., Brunelle, N., & Roy, É. (2015). Are poker players all the same? Latent class analysis. Journal of Gambling Studies, 31, 441–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dufour, M., Petit, S., & Brunelle, N. (2012). La perception du poker selon les joueurs adeptes: un jeu qui les distingue. Criminologie, 45, 7–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Edgerton, J. D., Melnyk, T. S., & Roberts, L. W. (2015). An exploratory study of multiple distinct gambling trajectories in emerging adults. Journal Of Youth Studies, 18, 743–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. el-Guebaly, N., Casey, D. M., Currie, S. R., Hodgins, D. C., Schopflocher, D. P., Smith, G. J., et al. (2015). The Leisure, Lifestyle, & Lifecycle Project (LLLP): A longitudinal study of gambling in Alberta. Final report. Alberta Gambling Research Institute, Alberta.Google Scholar
  18. Eysenck, S. B., & Eysenck, H. J. (1977). The place of impulsiveness in a dimensional system of personality description. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 16, 57–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ferris, J., & Wynne, H. (2001). The Canadian Problem Gambling Index: Final report. Report. Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse, Ontario.Google Scholar
  20. Fiedler, I., & Wilcke, A. (2012). The market for online poker. UNLV Gaming Research & Review Journal, 16, 7–20.Google Scholar
  21. Freeston, M. H., Ladouceur, R., Thibodeau, N., Gagnon, F., & Rhéaume, J. (1994). L’inventaire d’anxiété de Beck: Propriétés psychométriques d’une traduction française (Beck’s anxiety inventory: Psychometric properties of a French translation). L’Encéphale: Revue de psychiatrie clinique biologique et thérapeutique, 20, 47–55.Google Scholar
  22. Gainsbury, S. M., Blankers, M., Wilkinson, C., Schelleman-Offermans, K., & Cousijn, J. (2014). Recommendations for international gambling harm-minimisation guidelines: Comparison with effective public health policy. Journal of Gambling Studies, 30, 771–788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gori, A., Craparo, G., Caretti, V., Giannini, M., Iraci-Sareri, G., Bruschi, A., et al. (2016). Impulsivity, alexithymia and dissociation among pathological gamblers in different therapeutic settings: A multisample comparison study. Psychiatry Research, 246, 789–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hopley, A. A. B., Dempsey, K., & Nicki, R. (2012). Texas Hold’Em online poker: A further examination. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 10, 563–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hopley, A. A. B., & Nicki, R. M. (2010). Predictive factors of excessive online poker playing. Cyberpsychology, Behavior & Social Networking, 14, 379–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hume, C., Ball, K., & Salmon, J. (2006). Development and reliability of a self-report questionnaire to examine children’s perceptions of the physical activity environment at home and in the neighbourhood. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 3, 16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jacques, C., Ferland, F., Giroux, I., & Bouchard, C. (1997). Traduction et validation du Questionnaire d’Eysenck (Translation and validation of the Eysenck Questionnaire). Dans Ladouceur, R. Boutin, C., Doucet, C., Lachance, S. et Sylvain, C. (2000). Programme d’évaluation et de traitement des joueurs excessifs (Excessive Player Assessment and Treatment Program). Centre pour la prévention et le traitement du jeu, Université́ Laval.Google Scholar
  28. Johansson, A., Grant, J. E., Won Kim, S., Odlaug, B. L., & Götestam, K. G. (2009). Risk factors for problematic gambling: A critical literature review. Journal of Gambling Studies, 25, 67–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jones, B. L., Nagin, D. S., & Roeder, K. (2001). A SAS procedure based on mixture models for estimating developmental trajectories. Sociological Methods & Research, 29, 374–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kairouz, S., Nadeau, L., & Robillard, C. (2014). Portrait du jeu au Québec: Prévalence, incidence et trajectoires sur quatre ans. Rapport de recherche de l’Enquête ENHJEU. Université de Concordia, Québec.Google Scholar
  31. Kairouz, S., Paradis, C., & Monson, E. (2016). Gender, gambling settings and gambling behaviours among undergraduate poker players. International Gambling Studies, 16, 85–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kairouz, S., Paradis, C., & Nadeau, L. (2012). Are online gamblers more at risk than offline gamblers? Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15, 175–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Källmén, H., Andersson, P., & Andren, A. (2008). Are irrational beliefs and depressive mood more common among problem gamblers than non-gamblers? A survey study of swedish problem gamblers and controls. Journal of Gambling Studies, 24, 441–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Khazaal, Y., Chatton, A., Bouvard, A., Khiari, H., Achab, S., & Zullino, D. (2013). Internet poker websites and pathological gambling prevention policy. Journal of Gambling Studies, 29, 51–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Laakasuo, M., Palomäki, J., & Salmela, M. (2015). Emotional and social factors influence poker decision making accuracy. Journal of Gambling Studies, 31, 933–947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ladouceur, R., Jacques, C., Chevalier, S., Sévigny, S., & Hamel, D. (2005). Prevalence of pathological gambling in Quebec in 2002. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 50, 451–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ladouceur, R., Shaffer, P., Blaszczynski, A., & Shaffer, H. J. (2017). Responsible gambling: a synthesis of the empirical evidence. Addiction Research & Theory, 25, 225–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. LaPlante, D. A., Kleschinsky, J. H., LaBrie, R. A., Nelson, S. E., & Shaffer, H. J. (2009). Sitting at the virtual poker table: A prospective epidemiological study of actual Internet poker gambling behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 711–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lorains, F. K., Cowlishaw, S., & Thomas, S. A. (2011). Prevalence of comorbid disorders in problem and pathological gambling: Systematic review and meta-analysis of population surveys. Addiction, 106, 490–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Luce, C., Nadeau, L., & Kairouz, S. (2016). Pathways and transitions of gamblers over two years. International Gambling Studies, 16, 357–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. MacKay, T. L., Bard, N., Bowling, M., & Hodgins, D. C. (2014). Do pokers players know how good they are? Accuracy of poker skill estimation in online and offline players. Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 419–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. McCormack, A., & Griffiths, M. D. (2012). What differentiates professional poker players from recreational poker players? A qualitative interview study. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 10, 243–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mitrovic, D. V., & Brown, J. (2009). Poker mania and problem gambling: A study of distorted cognitions, motivation and alexithymia. Journal of Gambling Studies, 25, 489–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Momper, S. L., Delva, J., Grogan-Kaylor, A., Sanchez, N., & Volberg, R. A. (2010). The association of at-risk, problem, and pathological gambling with substance use, depression, and arrest history. Journal of Gambling Issues, 24, 7–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Morvannou, A., Dufour, M., Brunelle, N., Berbiche, D., & Roy, É. (2017). One-year prospective study on passion and gambling problems in poker players. Journal of Gambling Studies, 34(2), 379–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Norman, G. R., & Streiner, D. L. (1994). Biostatistics: The bare essentials. St Louis: People’s Medical Publishing House.Google Scholar
  47. O’Leary, K., & Carroll, C. (2013). The online poker sub-culture: Dialogues, interactions and networks. Journal of Gambling Studies, 29, 613–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Parhami, I., Mojtabai, R., Rosenthal, R. J., Afifi, T. O., & Fong, T. W. (2014). Gambling and the onset of comorbid mental disorders: A longitudinal study evaluating severity and specific symptoms. Journal of psychiatric practice, 20, 207–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Quigley, L., Yakovenko, I., Hodgins, D. C., Dobson, K. S., el-Guebaly, N., Casey, D. M., et al. (2015). Comorbid problem gambling and major depression in a community sample. Journal of Gambling Studies, 31, 1135–1152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Reith, G. (2015). ‘Carrières de jeu’: une étude longitudinale et qualitative des comportements de jeu. Scotland: University of Glasgow.Google Scholar
  51. Scholes-Balog, K. E., & Hemphill, S. A. (2012). Relationships between online gambling, mental health, and substance use: A review. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 15, 688–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sévigny, S., & Ladouceur, R. (2003). Gamblers’ irrational thinking about chance events: The ‘double switching’ concept. International Gambling Studies, 3, 149–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Shead, N. W., Hodgins, D. C., & Scharf, D. (2008). Differences between poker players and non-poker-playing gamblers. International Gambling Studies, 8, 167–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Siler, K. (2010). Social and psychological challenges of poker. Journal of Gambling Studies, 26, 401–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Smith, D. P., Battersby, M. W., Pols, R. G., Harvey, P. W., & Baigent, M. F. (2015). Predictors of relapse in problem gambling: A prospective cohort study. Journal of Gambling Studies, 31, 299–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Smith, M. D., Rousu, M. C., & Dion, P. (2012). Internet poker: Examining motivations, behaviors, outcomes, and player traits using structural equations analysis. Journal of Gambling Issues, 27, 1–23.Google Scholar
  57. Svensson, J., & Romild, U. (2011). Incidence of internet gambling in Sweden: Results from the Swedish longitudinal gambling study. International Gambling Studies, 11, 357–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Tremblay, J., Rouillard, P., April, N., & Sirois, M. (2001). Dépistage/évaluation du besoin d’aide-alcool (DEBA-alcool). Ressource document. CRT-ALTO et Régie Régionale de la Santé et des Services Sociaux du Québec. www.risqtoxico.ca. Accessed March 20, 2017.
  59. Williams, R. J., Hann, R. G., Schopflocher, D., West, B., McLaughlin, P., White, N., et al. (2015). Quinte longitudinal study of gambling and problem gambling. Research report. Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre, Ontario.Google Scholar
  60. Wohl, M. A., Gainsbury, S., Stewart, M. J., & Sztainert, T. (2013). Facilitating responsible gambling: The relative effectiveness of education-based animation and monetary limit setting pop-up messages among electronic gaming machine players. Journal of Gambling Studies, 29, 703–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wohl, M. J., Davis, C. G., & Hollingshead, S. J. (2017). How much have you won or lost? Personalized behavioral feedback about gambling expenditures regulates play. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 437–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wood, R., Williams, R., & Parke, J. (2012). The relationship between Internet gambling and problem gambling. In R. J. Williams, R. T. Wood, & J. Parke (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of internet gambling (pp. 200–211). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  63. Wood, R. T. A., Griffiths, M. D., & Parke, J. (2007). Acquisition, development, and maintenance of online poker playing in a student sample. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 10, 354–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Zaman, B., Geurden, K., De Cock, R., De Schutter, B., & Van Abeele, V. (2014). Motivation profiles of online poker players and the role of interface preferences: A laddering study among amateur and (semi-) professionals. Computers in Human Behavior, 39, 154–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Département de psychologieUniversité du Québec à Montréal (UQAM)MontréalCanada
  2. 2.Department of Sociology and AnthropologyConcordia UniversityMontréalCanada
  3. 3.Psychoeducation DepartmentUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières (UQTR)Trois-RivièresCanada
  4. 4.Faculty of Medicine and Health SciencesUniversité de SherbrookeLongueuilCanada
  5. 5.Department of PsychologyUniversité de MontréalMontréalCanada
  6. 6.Institut National de Santé Publique du QuébecMontréalCanada

Personalised recommendations