Self-Directed Gambling Changes: Trajectory of Problem Gambling Severity in Absence of Treatment
Most problem gamblers do not seek formal treatment, recovering on their own through cognitive re-appraisal or self-help strategies. Although barriers to treatment have been extensively studied, there is a paucity of research on self-directed changes in problem gambling and very few studies have examined these changes prospectively. The aim of this study was to examine the trajectory of gambling severity and behavior change over an 18-month period, among a sample of non-treatment seeking/attending problem gamblers recruited from the community (N = 204) interested in quitting or reducing gambling. Separate mixed effects models revealed that in absence of formal treatment, significant reductions in gambling severity, frequency, and amount gambled could be observed over the course of a 6 to 9-month period and that changes experienced within the first 12 months were maintained for an extended 6 months. Problem gambling severity at baseline was significantly associated with changes in severity over time, such that participants with more severe gambling problems demonstrated greater reductions in their gambling severity over time. A total of 11.1% of participants gambled within a low-risk threshold at 18 months, although 28.7% of the sample reported consecutive gambling severity scores below problem levels for the duration of 1 year or longer. The findings suggest that among problem gamblers motivated to quit or reduce their gambling, significant self-directed changes in gambling severity can occur over a relatively short time. Additional prospective studies are needed to document the role of specific self-help tools or thought processes in exacting gambling changes.
KeywordsSelf-directed change Natural recovery Gambling severity Problem gambling Prospective study
This research was funded by Gambling Research Exchange Ontario (formerly the Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre). The views expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect those of Gambling Research Exchange Ontario. We would also like to thank Marcos Sanches, Statistician at the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, for assistance with statistical analysis in this study.
This research was funded by the Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.
- Abbott, M. W., Bellinger, M., Garrett, N., & Mundy-McPherson, S. (2016). New Zealand national gambling study: Report number 5. Auckland, New Zealand: Auckland University of Technology: Gambling and Addictions Research Centre.Google Scholar
- Billi, R., Stone, C. A., Marden, P., & Yeung, K. (2014). The Victorian Gambling Study. A longitudinal study of gambling and health in Victoria, 2008–2012. Victoria, Australia: Victorian Responsible Gambling Foundation.Google Scholar
- el-Guebaly, N., Casey, D. M., Currie, S. R., Hodgins, D. C., Schopflocher, D. P., Smith, G. J., et al. (2015). The Leisure, Lifestyle, and Lifecycle Project (LLLP): A longitudinal study of gambling in Alberta. https://dspace.ucalgary.ca/bitstream/1880/50377/1/LLLP_Final_Report_Feb21_2015_V4.pdf.
- Ferris, J., & Wynne, H. (2001). The Canadian problem gambling index: Final report. Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse.Google Scholar
- Hing, N., Nuske, E., & Gainsbury, S. (2011). Gamblers at-risk and their helpseeking behaviour. https://www.gamblingresearch.org.au/publications/gamblers-at-risk-and-their-help-seeking-behaviour-2011. Accessed 6 June 2017.
- Hodgins, D. C., Fick, G. H., Murray, R., & Cunningham, J. A. (2013). Internet-based interventions for disordered gamblers: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial of online self-directed cognitive-behavioural motivational therapy. BMC Public Health, 13, 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-10.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Responsible Gambling Council. (2016). Responsible Gambling Council Annual Report 2015–2016. http://www.responsiblegambling.org/docs/default-source/rgc-research/rgc-ar-2015-2016.pdf?sfvrsn=abc5193c_14. Accessed 23 February 2018.
- Slutske, W. S., Blaszczynski, A., & Martin, N. G. (2009). Sex differences in the rates of recovery, treatment-seeking, and natural recovery from pathological gambling: Results from an Australian community-based twin survey. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 12(5), 425–432.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wandersleben, E. (2015). New Ohio problem gambling awareness campaign launched. http://mha.ohio.gov/Portals/0/assets/News/pressReleases/Be-the-95-percent-press-release-8-25.pdf. Accessed 23 February 2018.
- Wiebe, J., Maitland, S. B., Hodgins, D., Davey, A., & Gottlieb, B. (2009). Transitions and stability of problem gambling behaviours. Winnipeg, MB: Addictions Foundation of Manitoba.Google Scholar
- Williams, R. J., Hann, R. G., Schopflocher, D., West, B., McLaughlin, P., White, N., et al. (2015). Quinte longitudinal study of gambling and problem gambling. http://hdl.handle.net/10133/3641.