Advertisement

Journal of Gambling Studies

, Volume 34, Issue 2, pp 597–615 | Cite as

Casino Self- and Forced Excluders’ Gambling Behavior Before and After Exclusion

  • Roxana KotterEmail author
  • Anja Kräplin
  • Gerhard Bühringer
Original Paper

Abstract

Casino exclusion programs are intended to prevent or limit gambling-related harm. Although previous research showed that self-exclusion is associated with reduced gambling, it remains unknown whether self- and forced excluded subjects show different patterns of gambling behavior and if exclusion from casino gambling affects all gambling activities. The present study retrospectively investigated (1) the role of voluntariness of exclusion for the first time, and (2) general gambling behavior of excluded individuals before and after exclusion. A total of N = 215 casino excluders (self-excluders: n = 187, forced excluders: n = 28) completed an online survey or a face-to-face interview up to 8 years after enrollment. Self- and forced excluders showed similar rates of abstinence (self-excluders: 19.3%, forced excluders: 28.6%) and reduction (self-excluders: 67.4%, forced excluders: 60.7%), even though forced excluders reported a significantly greater initial gambling intensity compared to self-excluders (e.g., pre-exclusion gambling time; self-excluders: 3.2 days/week, forced excluders: 4.3 days/week). Overall, results indicated that 20.5% of excluders stopped all gambling activities and another 66.5% reduced their gambling. Those who continued gambling significantly reduced this behavior in every segment, except for gambling halls. Findings indicate that self- and forced exclusion are associated with similarly reduced gambling behavior, even in non-excluded segments. However, unchanged gambling in gambling halls emphasizes the importance to implement consistent exclusion programs over all gambling segments.

Keywords

Gambling Prevention Casino Self-exclusion Forced exclusion 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was funded in part by an unrestricted research donation by the Federal Association of German Casinos (BupriS) to the Technical University Dresden. Roxana Kotter and Anja Kräplin declare that they have no further conflict of interest. Gerhard Bühringer has received unrestricted research grants from the Bavarian State Ministry of Finance (regulatory authority for and operator of the state gambling monopoly), via the Bavarian State Ministry of the Environment and Public Health, the German Federal Ministry of Economics and Technology (regulatory authority for the commercial gaming industry), and from public and private gambling providers.

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association [APA]. (2000). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
  2. APA. (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5). Arlington: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
  3. Bellringer, M., Coombes, R., Pulford, J., & Abbott, M. (2010). Formative investigation into the effectiveness of gambling venue exclusion processes in New Zealand. Wellington: Ministry of Health. https://www.health.govt.nz/system/files/documents/pages/problem-gambling-formative-investigation-report-final.pdf. Accessed June 6, 2017.
  4. Blaszczynski, A., Ladouceur, R., & Nower, L. (2007). Self-exclusion: A proposed gateway to treatment model. International Gambling Studies, 7(1), 59–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blaszczynski, A., & Nower, L. (2002). A pathways model of problem and pathological gambling. Addiction, 97(5), 487–499.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bühringer, G., Czernecka, R., Kotter, R., & Kräplin, A. (2017). Anforderungen an Spielersperren. Eine Analyse aus verhaltenswissenschaftlicher Sicht [Requirements concering gambling exclusion. Analysis from a behavioral research perspective]. Beiträge zum Glücksspielwesen Eine Fachreihe des Behörden Spiegel (pp. 7–11). Bergisch Gladbach: Heider Druck GmbH.Google Scholar
  7. Bühringer, G., Kraus, L., Sonntag, D., Pfeiffer-Gerschel, T., & Steiner, S. (2007). Pathologisches Glücksspiel in Deutschland: Spiel- und Bevölkerungsrisiken [Pathological gambling in Germany: Gambling and population based risks]. Sucht, 53(5), 296–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cohen, I. M., McCormick, A. V., & Corrado, R. R. (2011). BCLC’s voluntary self-exclusion program: Perceptions and experiences of a sample of program participants. https://corporate.bclc.com/content/dam/bclc/corporate/documents/corporate-reports/VSE-Longitudinal-Study.pdf. Accessed June 6, 2017.
  9. Croucher, J. S., Croucher, R. F., & Leslie, J. R. (2006). Report of the pilot study on the self-exclusion program conducted by GameChange (NSW). Google Scholar
  10. De Bruin, D. E., Leenders, F. R. J., Fris, M., Verbraeck, H. T., Braam, R. V., & van de Wijngaart, G. F. (2001). Visitors of Holland Casino: Effectiveness of the policy for the prevention of problem gambling. The Netherlands: Addictions Research Institute, CVO University of Utrecht.Google Scholar
  11. Gainsbury, S. M. (2014). Review of self-exclusion from gambling venues as an intervention for problem gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 30(2), 229–251.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Grüne, B., Sleczka, P., Braun, B., & Kraus, L. (2017). Katamnese Studie zu Beratung und Behandlung bei Glücksspielproblemen. Munich: IFT Institut für Therapieforschung.Google Scholar
  13. Hayer, T., & Meyer, G. (2011). Self-exclusion as a harm minimization strategy: Evidence for the casino sector from selected European countries. Journal of Gambling Studies, 27(4), 685–700.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Hing, N., & Nuske, E. (2012). The self-exclusion experience for problem gamblers in South Australia. Australian Social Work, 65(4), 457–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hing, N., Russell, A., Tolchard, B., & Nuske, E. (2015). Are there distinctive outcomes from self-exclusion? An exploratory study comparing gamblers who have self-excluded, received counselling, or both. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 13(4), 481–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kraus, L., & Pabst, A. (2010). Studiendesign und Methodik des Epidemiologischen Suchtsurveys 2009 [Study design and methodology of the 2009 Epidemiological Survey of Substance Abuse]. Sucht, 56(5), 315–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ladouceur, R., Jacques, C., Giroux, I., Ferland, F., & Leblond, J. (2000). Analysis of a casino’s self-exclusion program. Journal of Gambling Studies, 16(4), 453–460.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Ladouceur, R., Sylvain, C., & Gosselin, P. (2007). Self-exclusion program: A longitudinal evaluation study. Journal of Gambling Studies, 23(1), 85–94.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Lampert, T., Kroll, L. E., Muters, S., & Stolzenberg, H. (2013). Measurement of socioeconomic status in the German health interview and examination survey for adults (DEGS1). Bundesgesundheitsblatt-Gesundheitsforschung-Gesundheitsschutz, 56(5–6), 631–636.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Lischer, S. (2016). The beneficial impact of self-exclusion. Conference contribution presented at the 11th European Conference on Gambling Studies and Policy Issues. Lisbon, Portugal. http://www.easg.org/media/file/lisbon2016/presentations/16-09-2016/Par%204/Suzanne_Lischer.pdf. Accessed June 6, 2017.
  21. Lorains, F. K., Cowlishaw, S., & Thomas, S. A. (2011). Prevalence of comorbid disorders in problem and pathological gambling: Systematic review and meta-analysis of population surveys. Addiction, 106(3), 490–498.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Ludwig, M., Kräplin, A., Braun, B., & Kraus, L. (2013). Gambling experiences, problems, research and policy: Gambling in Germany. Addiction, 108(9), 1554–1561.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Meyer, G., & Hayer, T. (2007). Die Spielsperre des Glücksspielers — Eine Bestandsaufnahme [The exclusion of gamblers: The current situation]. Sucht, 53(3), 160–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Meyer, G., & Hayer, T. (2010). Die Effektivität der Spielsperre als Maßnahme des Spielerschutzes. Frankfurt am Main: Internationaler Verlag der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
  25. Nelson, S. E., Kleschinsky, J. H., LaBrie, R. A., Kaplan, S., & Shaffer, H. J. (2010). One decade of self-exclusion: Missouri casino self-excluders four to ten years after enrollment. Journal of Gambling Studies, 26(1), 129–144.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Nowatzki, N. R., & Williams, R. J. (2002). Casino self-exclusion programs: A review of the issues. International Gambling Studies, 2, 3–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. O’Neil, M., Whetton, S., Dolman, B., Herbert, M., Giannopolous, V., O’Neil, D., et al. (2003). Evaluation of self-exclusion programs and harm minimisation measures. Report A. Melbourne: Gambling Research Panel. https://www.adelaide.edu.au/saces/docs/publications-reports/completereportselfexclusiona.pdf. Accessed June 6, 2017.
  28. Prochaska, J. O., Velicer, W., Rossi, J., Goldstein, M., Marcus, B., Rakowski, W., et al. (1994). Stages of change and decision balance for 12 problem behaviors. Health Psychology, 13, 39–46.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Reeckmann, M., & Walter, K. (2014). The ban of gamblers according to the State Treaty on Gambling in the light of consumer protection. European Journal of Gambling Law, 6, 383–391.Google Scholar
  30. Responsible Gambling Council. (2008). From enforcement to assistance: Evolving best practices in self-exclusion. Discussion paper by the Responsible Gambling Council. http://www.responsiblegambling.org/docs/default-source/research-reports/from-enforcement-to-assistance-evolving-best-practices-in-self-exclusion.pdf. Accessed July 25, 2017.
  31. Seah, A. (2016). Gambling Social Safeguards: Singapore’s Experience. Conference contribution presented at the 11th Europrean conference on gambling studies and policy issues. Lisbon, Portugal. http://www.easg.org/media/file/lisbon2016/presentations/15-09-2016/Par%202/Audrey_Seah.pdf. Accessed October 11, 2017.
  32. StataCorp. (2015). Stata statistical software: Release 14. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP.Google Scholar
  33. Steinberg, M. A. (2008). Ongoing evaluation of a self-exclusion program. Conference contribution presented at the 22nd National Conference on Problem Gambling. Long Beach, California, USA. http://www.ccpg.org/research/EvalCasino2007.pdf. Accessed July 25, 2017.
  34. Stinchfield, R., Govoni, R., & Frisch, G. R. (2005). DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for pathological gambling: Reliability, validity, and classification accuracy. American Journal on Addictions, 14(1), 73–82.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Townshend, P. (2007). Self-exclusion in a public health environment: An effective treatment option in New Zealand. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 5, 390–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tremblay, N., Boutin, C., & Ladouceur, R. (2008). Improved self-exclusion program: Preliminary results. Journal of Gambling Studies, 24(4), 505–518.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Vander Bilt, J., Dodge, H. H., Pandav, R., Shaffer, H. J., & Ganguli, M. (2004). Gambling participation and social support among older adults: A longitudinal community study. Journal of Gambling Studies, 20(4), 373–389.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Verlik, K. (2008). Casino and Racing Entertainment Centre voluntary self-exclusion program evaluation. Conference contribution presented at the 7th European Conference on Gambling Studies and Policy Issues. Nova Gorica, Slovenia. http://www.easg.org/media/file/conferences/novagorica2008/thursday/1400-ses3/verlik_kent.pdf. Accessed July 25, 2017.
  39. Williams, R. J., West, B. L., & Simpson, R. I. (2012). Prevention of problem gambling: A comprehensive review of the evidence, and identified best practices. Report prepared for the Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre and the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long Term Care. https://www.uleth.ca/dspace/bitstream/handle/10133/3121/2012-PREVENTION-OPGRC.pdf. Accessed July 25, 2017.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Work Group Addictive Behaviors, Risk Analysis, and Risk Management, Department of PsychologyTechnical University DresdenDresdenGermany
  2. 2.IFT Institut für TherapieforschungMunichGermany

Personalised recommendations