Journal of Gambling Studies

, Volume 33, Issue 4, pp 1051–1065 | Cite as

Bet Anywhere, Anytime: An Analysis of Internet Sports Bettors’ Responses to Gambling Promotions During Sports Broadcasts by Problem Gambling Severity

  • Nerilee Hing
  • Alex Myles Thomas Russell
  • Matthew Lamont
  • Peter Vitartas
Original Paper


Promotions for online sports betting during televised sports broadcasts are regularly viewed by millions of Australians, raising concerns about their impacts on vulnerable groups including at-risk and problem gamblers. This study examined whether responses to these promotions varied with problem gambling severity amongst 455 Australian Internet sports bettors participating in an online survey. Results indicated that young male Internet sports bettors are especially vulnerable to gambling problems, particularly if they hold positive attitudes to gambling sponsors who embed promotions into sports broadcasts and to the promotional techniques they use and this heightens the risk that alluring messages contribute to excessive gambling. As problem gambling severity increased, so too did recognition that these promotions have impacted negatively on their sports betting behaviour. Because a plethora of sports betting brands and promotions are now heavily integrated into sports coverage, social marketing efforts are needed to offset their persuasive appeal and counter the positive attitudes towards them that appear linked to excessive gambling amongst Internet sports bettors.


Sports betting Gambling Promotions Advertising Internet Online Problem gambling 



The authors would like to thank Dr. Elian Fink who assisted with data preparation.


This study was funded by the Queensland Department of Justice and Attorney General (Responsible Gambling Research Grant, no number assigned).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

All authors declare no conflict of interest in relation to this manuscript. Authors A and B have received consultancy funds from gambling industry operators and research funds from governments. Authors C and D have received research funds from governments.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.


  1. Behrend, T. S., Sharek, D. J., Meade, A. W., & Wiebe, E. N. (2011). The viability of crowdsourcing for survey research. Behavior Research Methods, 43(3), 800–813.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Binde, P. (2009). Exploring the impact of gambling advertising: An interview study of problem gamblers. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 7(4), 541–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Binde, P. (2014). Gambling advertising: A critical research review. London: Responsible Gambling Trust.Google Scholar
  4. Blaszczynski, A., & Hunt, C. (2011). Online sports betting has created new generation of problem gamblers. Sydney: The University of Sydney; 2011. Available from:
  5. Blaszczynski, A., & Nower, L. (2002). A pathways model of problem and pathological gambling. Addiction, 97, 487–499.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Davison, W. P. (2003). The third-person effect in communication. Public Opinion Quarterly, 47, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Department of Broadband Communications and the Digital Economy (DBCDE) (2013). Final report 2012: Review of the Interactive Gambling Act 2001. Canberra: DBCDE.Google Scholar
  8. Derevensky, J., Sklar, A., Gupta, R., & Messerlian, C. (2010). An empirical study examining the impact of gambling advertisements on adolescent gambling attitudes and behaviors. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 8(1), 21–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Du Plessis, E. (1994). Recognition versus recall. Journal of Advertising Research, 34(3), 92–106.Google Scholar
  10. Ferris, J., & Wynne, H. (2001). The Canadian Problem Gambling Index. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse.Google Scholar
  11. Gainsbury, S. M., Russell, A., Hing, N., Wood, R., Lubman, D. I., & Blaszczynski, A. (2013). How the Internet is changing gambling: Findings from an Australian prevalence survey. Journal of Gambling Studies., 23, 6. doi: 10.1007/s10899-013-9404-7.Google Scholar
  12. Gainsbury, S. M., Russell, A., Hing, N., Wood, R., Lubman, D. I., & Blaszczynski, A. (2014). The prevalence and determinants of problem gambling in Australia: Assessing the impact of interactive gambling and new technologies. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 28(3), 769–779. doi: 10.1037/a0036207.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Global Betting and Gaming Consultants (GBGC). (2011). Global gaming report (6th ed.). Castletown: GBGC.Google Scholar
  14. Gordon, R., & Chapman, M. (2014). Brand community and sports betting in Australia. Melbourne: Victorian Responsible Gambling Foundation.Google Scholar
  15. Grant, J. E., & Kim, S. (2001). Demographic and clinical features of 131 adult pathological gamblers. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 62, 957–962.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Grüsser, S. M., Plöntzke, B., & Albrecht, U. (2005). Pathological gambling: An empirical study of the desire for addictive substances. Nervenarzt, 76, 592–596.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Göritz, A., Reinhold, N., & Batinic, B. (2000). Online panels. In B. Batinic, U. Reips, & M. Bosnjak (Eds.), Online social sciences (pp. 29–51). Seattle: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  18. Hanss, D., Mentzoni, R. A., Griffiths, M. D., & Pallesen, S. (2015). The impact of gambling advertising: Problem gamblers report stronger impacts on involvement, knowledge, and awareness than recreational gamblers. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors. doi: 10.1037/adb0000062.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. H2 Gambling Capital (2013). There’s nothing virtual about the opportunity in real-money gambling: Opportunities for game developers in regulated real-money online gambling. Retrieved 15 September 2013 from:
  20. Hing, N., Cherney, L., Blaszczynski, A., Gainsbury, S., & Lubman, D. (2014a). Do advertising and promotions for online gambling increase gambling consumption? An exploratory study. International Gambling Studies, 14(3), 394–409. doi: 10.1080/14459795.2014.903989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hing, N., Cherney, L., Gainsbury, S., Lubman, D., Wood, R., & Blaszczynski, A. (2014b). Maintaining and losing control during Internet gambling: A qualitative study of gamblers’ experiences. New Media and Society. doi: 10.1177/1461444814521140.Google Scholar
  22. Hing, N., Gainsbury, S., Blaszczynski, A., Wood, R., Lubman, D., & Russell, A. (2014c). Interactive gambling. Melbourne: Gambling Research Australia.Google Scholar
  23. Hing, N., Lamont, M., Vitartas, P., & Fink, E. (2014d). Sports-embedded gambling promotions: a study of exposure, sports betting intention and problem gambling amongst adults. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction. doi: 10.1007/s11469-014-9519-9.Google Scholar
  24. Hing, N., Lamont, M., Vitartas, P., & Fink, E. (2015). How sports bettors respond to sports-embedded gambling promotions: Implications for compulsive consumption. Journal of Business Research., 23, 6. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.03.003.Google Scholar
  25. Hing, N., Vitartas, P., Lamont, M., & Fink, E. (2014e). Adolescent exposure to gambling promotions during televised sport: An exploratory study of links with gambling intentions. International Gambling Studies, 14(3), 374–393. doi: 10.1080/14459795.2014.902489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Joint Select Committee on Gambling Reform (JSCGR). (2011). Interactive and online gambling and gambling advertising. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
  27. Joint Select Committee on Gambling Reform (JSCGR). (2013). The advertising and promotion of gambling services in sport. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
  28. Kerin, L. (2015). ‘Dramatic increase’ in online gambling addiction among young men, treatment clinic warns. The World Today.
  29. LaBrie, R. A., LaPlante, D. A., Nelson, S. E., Schumann, A., & Shaffer, H. J. (2007). Assessing the playing field: A prospective longitudinal study of internet sports gambling behavior. Journal of Gambling Studies, 23(3), 347–362.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Lamont, M., Hing, N., & Gainsbury, S. (2011). Gambling on sport sponsorship: A conceptual framework for research. Sport Management Review, 14(3), 246–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lamont, M., Hing, N., & Vitartas, P. (2015). Affective responses to gambling promotions during televised sport: A qualitative analysis. Sport Management Review. doi: 10.1016/j.smr.2015.06.002.Google Scholar
  32. Martin, I. M., Kamins, M. A., Pirouz, D. M., Davis, S. W., Haws, K. L., Mirabito, A. M., et al. (2013). On the road to addiction: The facilitative and preventive roles of marketing cues. Journal of Business Research, 66(8), 1219–1226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. McCormack, A., Shorter, G. W., & Griffiths, M. D. (2013). Characteristics and predictors of problem gambling on the Internet. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 11(6), 634–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McMullan, J. (2011). Submission to the Joint Select Committee on Gambling Reform. Available from
  35. Milner, L., Hing, N., Vitartas, P., & Lamont, M. (2013). An exploratory study of embedded gambling promotion in Australian football television broadcasts. Communication, Politics and Culture, 46, 177–198.Google Scholar
  36. Morgan Stanley. (2014). Australia/UK wagering: Australia online—Picking the winning trifecta. Sydney: Morgan Stanley Research Asia/Pacific.Google Scholar
  37. Palmer, C. (2014). Sports betting research. Hobart: Department of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar
  38. Parke, A., Harris, A., Parke, J., Rigbye, J., & Blaszczysnki, A. (2014). Facilitating awareness and informed choice in gambling. The Journal of Gambling Business and Economics, 8(3), 6–20.Google Scholar
  39. Productivity Commission (1999). Australia’s gambling industries. Report No. 10. Canberra: AusInfo.Google Scholar
  40. PWC (2011). Changing the game: Outlook for the global sports market to 2015. Retrieved 21 January 2015 from:
  41. Schottler Consulting. (2012). Research to investigate the effects of gambling advertising, marketing and sponsorship on gambling perceptions and behavior. Wellington: New Zealand Ministry of Health.Google Scholar
  42. Sharpe, L., & Tarrier, N. (1993). Towards a cognitive-behavioural theory of problem gambling. British Journal of Psychiatry, 162, 407–412.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Speed, R., & Thompson, P. (2000). Determinants of sports sponsorship response. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(2), 226–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sproston, K., Hanley, C., Hing, N., & Gainsbury, S. (2015). Marketing of sports betting and racing. Melbourne: Gambling Research Australia.Google Scholar
  45. Thomas, S. A., & Jackson, A. C. (2004). Influences on gambling behaviours and outcomes: A model for the design of effective interventions. Gambling Research, 16(2), 40.Google Scholar
  46. Valentine, G., & Hughes, K. (2008). New forms of participation: Problem internet gambling and the role of the family. Leeds: University of Leeds.Google Scholar
  47. Wardle, H., Moody, A., Griffiths, M., Orford, J., & Volberg, R. (2011). Defining the online gambler and patterns of behaviour integration: Evidence from the British Gambling Prevalence Survey 2010. International Gambling Studies, 11(3), 339–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wood, R., & Williams, R. (2011). A comparative profile of the Internet gambler: Demographic characteristics, game play patterns, and problem gambling status. New Media and Society, 13, 1123–1141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wulfert, E., Maxson, J., & Jardin, B. (2009). Cue-specific reactivity in experienced gamblers. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 23(4), 731–735.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  50. Zajonc, R. B. (2001). Mere exposure: A gateway to the subliminal. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10(6), 224–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Health, Medical and Applied SciencesCentral Queensland UniversityBundabergAustralia
  2. 2.Centre for Gambling Education and ResearchSouthern Cross UniversityLismoreAustralia
  3. 3.Faculty of Business, Economics and LawLatrobe UniversityMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations