Journal of Gambling Studies

, Volume 33, Issue 3, pp 993–1010 | Cite as

Internet-Based Delivery of Cognitive Behaviour Therapy Compared to Monitoring, Feedback and Support for Problem Gambling: A Randomised Controlled Trial

  • Leanne M. CaseyEmail author
  • Tian P. S. Oei
  • Namrata Raylu
  • Katherine Horrigan
  • Jamin Day
  • Michael Ireland
  • Bonnie A. Clough
Original Paper


The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of an Internet-based cognitive behavioural therapy program (I-CBT) for the treatment of problem gambling, when compared to a waitlist control and an active comparison condition consisting of monitoring, feedback, and support (I-MFS). Participants (N = 174) were randomly allocated to the three conditions. Variables of interest were gambling outcome and related mental health measures. Participants in the active conditions (I-CBT and I-MFS) completed six online modules. Both I-CBT and I-MFS conditions resulted in significant treatment gains on gambling severity. However, I-CBT was also associated with reductions in a range of other gambling-related and mental health outcomes. Compared with I-MFS, I-CBT produced greater effects across seven outcomes measures, relating to gambling urges, cognitions, stress, and life satisfaction. I-CBT participants also rated the program as significantly more satisfactory. Treatment gains observed for both active conditions were found to be stable through to 12 month follow up. The results indicate that the benefits of I-CBT were more than simply the non-specific effects of engaging in online treatment or receiving motivation, feedback, and support. Online treatments for gambling may be a valuable tool in increasing help-seeking and treatment engagement in this population, and be integrated as part of stepped care approaches to treatment.


Pathological gambling Problem gambling e-Therapy e-Mental health Gambling disorder 



We would like to thank the patients who participated in this study and the post graduate clinical students who helped in collecting data in this project.


This research was funded by the Department of Employment, Economic Development and Innovation, Queensland State Government, Australia.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflicts of interest

No conflicts of interests to declare.


  1. American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-IV-TR (4th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing.Google Scholar
  2. Carlbring, P., Degerman, N., Jonsson, J., & Andersson, G. (2012). Internet-based treatment of pathological gambling with a three-year follow-up. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 41(4), 321–334.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Carlbring, P., & Smit, F. (2008). Randomized trial of internet-delivered self-help with telephone support for pathological gamblers. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 76(6), 1090.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Carver, C. S. (1997). You want to measure coping but your protocol’s too long: consider the brief COPE. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 4(1), 92–100. doi: 10.1207/s15327558ijbm0401_6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Casey, L. M., Oei, T. P., Melville, K. M., Bourke, E., & Newcombe, P. A. (2008). Measuring self-efficacy in gambling: The gambling refusal self-efficacy questionnaire. Journal of Gambling Studies, 24(2), 229–246.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Casey, L. M., Wright, M.-A., & Clough, B. A. (2014). Comparison of perceived barriers and treatment preferences associated with internet-based and face-to-face psychological treatment of depression. International Journal of Cyber Behavior, Psychology and Learning, 4(4), 16–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Castren, S., Pankakoski, M., Tamminen, M., Lipsanen, J., Ladouceur, R., & Lahti, T. (2013). Internet-based CBT intervention for gamblers in Finland: Experiences from the field. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 54(3), 230–235. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12034.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Comer, J. S., & Kendall, P. C. (2013). The Oxford handbook of research strategies for clinical psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Devilly, G. J., & McFarlane, A. C. (2009). When wait lists are not feasible, nothing is a thing that does not need to be done. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 77(6), 1159–1168. doi: 10.1037/a0016878.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Evans, L., & Delfabbro, P. H. (2005). Motivators for change and barriers to help-seeking in Australian problem gamblers. Journal of Gambling Studies, 21(2), 133–155.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Faul, F., & Erdfelder, E. (1992). GPOWER: A priori, post hoc, and compromise power analyses for MS-DOS (Version 2). Bonn: Bonn University, Dep. of Psychology.Google Scholar
  13. Frisch, M. B. (1994). QOLI: Quality of life inventory: manual and treatment guide. Pearson.Google Scholar
  14. Gainsbury, S., & Blaszczynski, A. (2011). Online self-guided interventions for the treatment of problem gambling. International Gambling Studies, 11(3), 289–308. doi: 10.1080/14459795.2011.617764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hodgins, D. C., Peden, N., & Cassidy, E. (2005). The association between comorbidity and outcome in pathological gambling: A prospective follow-up of recent quitters. Journal of Gambling Studies, 21(3), 255–271.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Kim, S. W., Grant, J. E., Adson, D. E., & Shin, Y. C. (2001). Double-blind naltrexone and placebo comparison study in the treatment of pathological gambling. Biological Psychiatry, 49(11), 914–921.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Kim, S. W., Grant, J. E., Potenza, M. N., Blanco, C., & Hollander, E. (2009). The Gambling Symptom Assessment Scale (G-SAS): A reliability and validity study. Psychiatry Research, 166(1), 76–84.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Lesieur, H. R., & Blume, S. B. (1987). The South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS): A new instrument for the identification of pathological gamblers. American journal of Psychiatry, 144(9).Google Scholar
  19. Lovibond, S. H., & Lovibond, P. F. (1995). Manual for the depression anxiety stress scales. Sydney: The Psychology Foundation of Australia.Google Scholar
  20. Melville, K. M., Casey, L. M., & Kavanagh, D. J. (2007). Psychological treatment dropout among pathological gamblers. Clinical Psychology Review, 27(8), 944–958.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Melville, K. M., Casey, L. M., & Kavanagh, D. J. (2010). Dropout from Internet-based treatment for psychological disorders. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 49(4), 455–471.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Myrseth, H., Brunborg, G. S., Eidem, M., & Pallesen, S. (2013). Description and pre-post evaluation of a telephone and Internet based treatment programme for pathological gambling in Norway: A pilot study. International Gambling Studies, 13(2), 205–220. doi: 10.1080/14459795.2012.759610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Oei, T. P., Raylu, N., & Casey, L. M. (2010). Effectiveness of group and individual formats of a combined motivational interviewing and cognitive behavioral treatment program for problem gambling: A randomized controlled trial. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 38(02), 233–238.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Raylu, N., & Oei, T. P. (2004a). The Gambling Related Cognitions Scale (GRCS): Development, confirmatory factor validation and psychometric properties. Addiction, 99(6), 757–769.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Raylu, N., & Oei, T. P. (2004b). The gambling urge scale: development, confirmatory factor validation, and psychometric properties. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 18(2), 100.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Reilly, C., & Smith, N. (2013). The evolving definition of pathological gambling in the DSM-5. National center for responsible gaming, 1–6.Google Scholar
  27. Saunders, J. B., Aasland, O. G., Babor, T. F., de la Fuente, J. R., & Grant, M. (1993). Development of the alcohol use disorders identification test (AUDIT): WHO collaborative project on early detection of persons with harmful alcohol consumption-II. Addiction, 88(6), 791–804.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Stinchfield, R., Kushner, M. G., & Winters, K. C. (2005). Alcohol use and prior substance abuse treatment in relation to gambling problem severity and gambling treatment outcome. Journal of Gambling Studies, 21(3), 273–297.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Suurvali, H., Hodgins, D. C., & Cunningham, J. A. (2010). Motivators for resolving or seeking help for gambling problems: A review of the empirical literature. Journal of Gambling Studies, 26(1), 1–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Tavares, H., Martins, S. S., Zilberman, M. L., & el-Guebaly, N. (2002). Gamblers seeking treatment: Why haven’t they come earlier? Addictive Disorders & Their Treatment, 1(2), 65–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Toneatto, T., Skinner, W., & Dragonetti, R. (2002). Patterns of substance use in treatment-seeking problem gamblers: Impact on treatment outcomes. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58(7), 853–859.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Winters, K. C., Specker, S., & Stinchfield, R. (2002). Measuring pathological gambling with the Diagnostic Interview for Gambling Severity (DIGS) (pp. 143–148). The downside: Problem and pathological gambling.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Leanne M. Casey
    • 1
    Email author
  • Tian P. S. Oei
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
  • Namrata Raylu
    • 2
  • Katherine Horrigan
    • 5
  • Jamin Day
    • 6
  • Michael Ireland
    • 6
  • Bonnie A. Clough
    • 6
  1. 1.School of Applied Psychology, Behavioural Basis of Health, Menzies Health InstituteGriffith UniversityMt GravattAustralia
  2. 2.School of PsychologyThe University of QueenslandSt LuciaAustralia
  3. 3.James Cook UniversitySingaporeSingapore
  4. 4.Nanjing UniversityNanjingChina
  5. 5.Private PracticeNorth LakesAustralia
  6. 6.School of Psychology and Counselling, Institute for Resilient RegionsUniversity of Southern QueenslandSpringfield CentralAustralia

Personalised recommendations