Advertisement

Journal of Gambling Studies

, Volume 33, Issue 3, pp 769–782 | Cite as

Fun Seeking and Reward Responsiveness Moderate the Effect of the Behavioural Inhibition System on Coping-Motivated Problem Gambling

  • Matthew T. KeoughEmail author
  • Jeffrey D. Wardell
  • Christian S. Hendershot
  • R. Michael Bagby
  • Lena C. Quilty
Original Paper

Abstract

Gray’s Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory (RST) predicts that the Behavioral Inhibition System (BIS) may relate to coping-motivated problem gambling, given its central role in anxiety. Studies examining the BIS-problem gambling association, however, are mixed. The revised RST posits that the Behavioral Approach System (BAS) may moderate the effect of the BIS on coping-motivated problem gambling. A concurrently strong BAS may highlight the negatively reinforcing effects of gambling, which may strengthen coping motives and increase gambling-related harms. We examined these interactive effects to clarify the moderators and mediators of the negative reinforcement pathway to problem gambling. Data came from a larger investigation of problem gambling among individuals with mood disorders. All participants (N = 275) met criteria for a lifetime depressive or bipolar disorder. During a two-day assessment, participants completed a diagnostic assessment and self-reports. Mediated moderation path analysis showed positive indirect effects from the BIS to problem gambling via coping motives at high, but not at low, levels of BAS-Reward Responsiveness and BAS-Fun Seeking. Enhancement motives were also found to mediate the associations of BAS-Fun Seeking and BAS-Drive with problem gambling. Reward Responsiveness and Fun Seeking facets of the BAS may strengthen coping gambling motives within the mood disorders.

Keywords

Behavioral inhibition system Behavioral approach system Problem gambling Motives Mood disorders 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Data collection and preparation of this manuscript was supported by Grant #2662 from the Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre. Dr. Bagby was the PI on this Grant.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Research Involving Human Participants

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. All participants provided informed consent before participation in this study.

References

  1. Abbott, M. W., & Volberg, R. A. (2006). Measurement of adult problem and pathological gambling. International Gambling Studies, 6(2), 175–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  3. Balodis, S. R. S., Thomas, A. C., & Moore, S. M. (2014). Sensitivity to reward and punishment: Horserace and EGM gamblers compared. Personality and Individual Differences, 56, 29–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavior change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238–246.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Blaszczynski, A., & Nower, L. (2002). A pathways model of problem and pathological gambling. Addiction, 97, 487–499.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Brunborg, G. S., Johnson, B. H., Mentzoni, R. A., Molde, H., & Pallesen, S. (2011). Individual differences in evaluative conditioning and reinforcement sensitivity affect bet-sizes during gambling. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 729–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carver, C. S., & White, T. L. (1994). Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 319–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cogswell, A., Alloy, L. B., van Dullmen, M. H. M., & Fresco, D. M. (2006). A psychometric evaluation of behavioral inhibition and approach self-report measures. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 1649–1658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Colder, C. R., & O’Connor, R. M. (2002). Attention bias and disinhibited behavior as predictors of alcohol use and enhancement reasons for drinking. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 16(4), 325–332.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Cooper, M. L. (1994). Motivations for alcohol use among adolescents: Development and validation of a four-factor model. Psychological Assessment, 6, 117–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cooper, M. L., Frone, M. R., Russell, M., & Mudar, P. (1995). Drinking to regulate positive and negative emotions: A motivational model of alcohol use. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 990–1005.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Corr, P. J. (2002). J.A. Gray’s reinforcement sensitivity theory: Tests of the joint subsystem hypothesis of anxiety and impulsivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 511–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Corr, P. J. (2008). The reinforcement sensitivity theory of personality. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Corr, P. J., & Cooper, A. J. (2016). The reinforcement sensitivity theory of personality questionnaire (RST-PQ): Development and validation. Psychological Assessment. doi: 10.1037/pas0000273.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. DeYoung, C. (2010). Mapping personality traits onto brain systems: BIS, BAS, FFFS and beyond. European Journal of Personality, 24, 404–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Edwards, J. R., & Lambert, L. S. (2007). Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. Psychological Methods, 12(1), 1–22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. El-Guebaly, N., Patten, S. B., Currie, S., Williams, J. V., Beck, C. A., Maxwell, C. J., et al. (2006). Epidemiological associations between gambling, substance use, & mood and anxiety disorders. Journal of Gambling Studies, 22(3), 275–287.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. First, M. B., Spitzer, R. L., Gibbon, M., & Williams, J. B. W. (2002). Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV-TR axis I disorders, research version, patient edition. (SCID-I/P). New York: Biometrics Research, New York State Psychiatric Institute.Google Scholar
  20. Franken, I. H., Muris, P., & Georgieva, I. (2006). Gray’s model of personality and addiction. Addictive Behaviors, 31(3), 399–403.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Fritz, M. S., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2007). Required sample size to detect the mediated effect. Psychological Science, 18(3), 233–239.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Gaher, R. M., Hahn, A. M., Shishido, H., Simons, J. S., & Gaster, S. (2015). Associations between sensitivity to punishment, sensitivity to reward, and gambling. Addictive Behaviors, 42, 180–184.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Goodie, A. S., MacKillop, J., Miller, J. D., Fortune, E. E., Maples, J., Lance, C. E., et al. (2013). Evaluating the South Oaks gambling screen with DSM-IV and DSM-5 criteria: Results from a diverse community sample. Assessment, 20(5), 523–531.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Gray, J. A. (1987). Perspectives on anxiety and impulsivity: A commentary. Journal of Research in Personality, 21, 493–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gray, J. A., & McNaughton, N. (2000). The neuropsychology of anxiety. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Heym, N., Ferguson, E., & Lawrence, C. (2008). An evaluation of the relationship between Gray’s revised RST and Eysenck’s PEN: Distinguishing BIS and FFS in Carver and White’s BIS/BAS scales. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 709–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Keough, M. T., & O’Connor, R. M. (2014). Clarifying the measurement and the role of the behavioral inhibition system in alcohol misuse. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 38(5), 1470–1479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Keough, M. T., & O’Connor, R. M. (2015). Interactive effects of the BIS and the BAS on trajectories of alcohol misuse after university graduation. Substance Abuse: Research and Treatment, 9(S1), 33–40.Google Scholar
  30. Keough, M. T., O’Connor, R. M., & Colder, C. R. (2016). Testing the implicit and explicit cognitions underlying BIS-related drinking in young adults. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 40(5), 1065–1074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kessler, R. C., Hwang, I., LaBrie, R., Petukhova, M., Sampson, N. A., Winters, K. C., et al. (2008). The prevalence and correlates of DSM-IV pathological gambling in the national comorbidity survey replication. Psychological Medicine, 38(9), 1351–1360.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Kim, H.-K. (2013). Statistical notes for clinical researchers: Assessing normal distribution using skewness and kurtosis. Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics, 38(1), 52–54.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Kim, S. W., Grant, J. E., Eckert, E. D., Faris, P. L., & Hartman, B. K. (2006). Pathological gambling and mood disorders: Clinical associations and treatment implications. Journal of Affective Disorders, 92, 109–116.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
  35. Lesieur, H. R., & Blume, S. B. (1987). The South Oaks gambling screen (SOGS): A new instrument for the identification of pathological gamblers. American Journal of Psychiatry, 144(9), 1184–1188.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Lorains, F. K., Cowlishaw, S., & Thomas, S. A. (2011). Prevalence of comorbid disorders in problem and pathological gambling: Systematic review and meta-analysis of population surveys. Addiction, 106(3), 490–498.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Loxton, N. J., Gnuyen, D., Casey, L., & Dawe, S. (2008). Reward drive, rash impulsivity and punishment sensitivity in problem gamblers. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 167–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. MacKinnon, D. P., Krull, J. L., & Lockwood, C. M. (2000). Equivalence of the mediation, confounding and suppression effect. Prevention Science, 1(4), 173–181.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. MacLaren, V. V., Fugelsang, J. A., Harrigan, K. A., & Dixon, M. J. (2012). Effects of impulsivity, reinforcement sensitivity, and cognitive style on pathological gambling symptoms among frequent slot machine players. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 390–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mercer, K. B., & Eastwood, J. D. (2010). Is boredom associated with problem gambling behaviour? It depends on what you mean by ‘boredom’. International Gambling Studies, 10(1), 91–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Milosevic, A., & Ledgerwood, D. M. (2010). The subtyping of pathological gambling: A comprehensive review. Clinical Psychology Review, 30, 988–998.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Mrazek, P. J., & Haggerty, R. J. (Eds.). (1994). Reducing risks for mental disorders: Frontiers for preventive intervention research. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  43. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2012). Mplus user’s guide: Version 7. Los Angeles: Muthén and Muthén.Google Scholar
  44. Nehlin, C., Grönbladh, L., Fredriksson, A., & Jansson, L. (2013). Alcohol and drug use, smoking, and gambling among psychiatric outpatients: A 1-year prevalence study. Substance Abuse, 34(2), 162–168.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. O’Connor, R. M., Stewert, S. H., & Watt, M. C. (2009). Distinguishing BAS risk for university students’ drinking, smoking, and gambling behaviors. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 514–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Petry, N. M., Stinson, F. S., & Grant, B. F. (2005). Comorbidity of DSM-IV pathological gambling and other psychiatric disorders: results from the national epidemiologic survey on alcohol and related conditions. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 66(5), 564–574.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Quilty, L. C., DeYoung, C. G., Oakman, J. M., & Bagby, R. M. (2014a). Extraversion and behavioural activation: Integrating the components of approach. Journal of Personality Assessment, 96(1), 87–94.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Quilty, L. C., Keough, M. T., Toneatto, T., Watson, C., & Bagby, R. M. (under review). Development and validation of a measure of gambling motivations: The reasons for gambling scale. Canadian Journal of Addiction.Google Scholar
  49. Quilty, L. C., Mackew, L., & Bagby, R. M. (2014b). Distinct profiles of behavioural inhibiotion and activation system sensitivity in unipolar vs. bipolar mood disorders. Psychiatry Research, 219(1), 228–231.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Smillie, L. D., Pickering, A. D., & Jackson, C. J. (2006). The new reinforcement sensitivity theory: Implications for personality measurement. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(4), 320–335.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Stewart, S. H., & Zack, M. (2008). Development and psychometric evaluation of a three-dimensional gambling motives questionnaire. Addiction, 103, 1110–1117.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Tucker, L., & Lewis, C. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38(1), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Voigt, D. C., Dillard, J. P., Braddock, K. H., Anderson, J. W., Sopory, P., & Stephenson, M. T. (2009). Carver and White's (1994) BIS/BAS scales and their relationship to risky health behaviours. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 89–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wardell, J. D., O’Connor, R. M., Read, J. P., & Colder, C. R. (2011). Behavioral approach system moderates the prospective association between the behavioral inhibition system and alcohol outcomes in college students. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 72(6), 1028–1036.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  55. Wardell, J. D., Read, J. P., Colder, C. R., & Merrill, J. E. (2012). Positive alcohol expectancies mediate the influence of the behavioral activation system on alcohol use: A prospective path analysis. Addictive Behaviours, 37(4), 435–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wardell, J. D., Quilty, L. C., Hendershot, C. S., & Bagby, R. M. (2015). Motivational pathways from reward sensitivity and punishment sensitivity to gambling frequency and gambling-related problems. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 29(4), 1022–1030.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Matthew T. Keough
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Jeffrey D. Wardell
    • 1
  • Christian S. Hendershot
    • 1
    • 3
    • 4
  • R. Michael Bagby
    • 3
  • Lena C. Quilty
    • 1
    • 4
  1. 1.Campbell Family Mental Health Research InstituteCentre for Addiction and Mental HealthTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyConcordia UniversityMontrealCanada
  3. 3.Departments of Psychology and PsychiatryUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  4. 4.Department of PsychiatryUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations