Journal of Gambling Studies

, Volume 33, Issue 1, pp 15–36 | Cite as

Gambling, Risk-Taking, and Antisocial Behavior: A Replication Study Supporting the Generality of Deviance

  • Sandeep Mishra
  • Martin L. Lalumière
  • Robert J. Williams
Original Paper

Abstract

Research suggests that high frequency gambling is a component of the “generality of deviance”, which describes the observation that various forms of risky and antisocial behavior tend to co-occur among individuals. Furthermore, risky and antisocial behaviors have been associated with such personality traits as low self-control, and impulsivity, and sensation-seeking. We conducted a replication (and extension) of two previous studies examining whether high frequency gambling is part of the generality of deviance using a large and diverse community sample (n = 328). This study was conducted as a response to calls for more replication studies in the behavioral and psychological sciences (recent systematic efforts suggest that a significant proportion of psychology studies do not replicate). The results of the present study largely replicate those previously found, and in many cases, we observed stronger associations among measures of gambling, risk-taking, and antisocial behavior in this diverse sample. Together, this study provides evidence for the generality of deviance inclusive of gambling (and, some evidence for the replicability of research relating to gambling and individual differences).

Keywords

Gambling Risk-taking Antisocial behavior Deviance Personality Attitudes Replication 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by a research grants and fellowships from the Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre and the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. The authors would like to thank Thomas Fox, Sara Kafashan, Lindsay Kleiner, Christine Mishra, and Alix Shriner for their help with data collection.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

References

  1. Arneklev, B. J., Grasmick, H. G., Tittle, C. R., & Bursik, R. J, Jr. (1993). Low self-control and imprudent behavior. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 9, 225–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bagby, R. M., Vachon, D. D., Bulmash, E., Toneatto, T., Quilty, L. C., & Costa, P. T. (2007). Pathological gambling and the five factor model of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 873–880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blais, A., & Weber, E. U. (2006). A domain-specific risk-taking (DOSPERT) scale for adult populations. Judgment and Decision Making, 1, 33–47.Google Scholar
  4. Blaszczynski, A., & McConaghy, N. (1994). Antisocial personality disorder and pathological gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 10, 129–145.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Blaszczynski, A., McConaghy, N., & Frankova, A. (1989). Crime, antisocial personality and pathological gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 5, 137–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blaszczynski, A., Steel, Z., & McConaghy, N. (1997). Impulsivity in pathological gambling: The antisocial impulsivist. Addiction, 92, 75–87.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Brase, G. L. (2009). How different types of participant payments alter task performance. Judgment and Decision Making, 4, 419–428.Google Scholar
  8. Bromiley, P., & Curley, S. P. (1992). Individual differences in risk-taking. In J. F. Yates (Ed.), Risk taking behaviour (pp. 87–132). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  9. Buss, A. H., & Perry, M. (1992). The aggression questionnaire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 452–459.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Camerer, C. F., & Hogarth, R. M. (1999). The effects of financial incentives in experiments: A review and capital-labor-production framework. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 19, 7–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Costa, P. T., & McRae, R. R. (1992). The revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO five factor inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
  12. Donovan, J. E., & Jessor, R. (1985). Structure of problem behavior in adolescence and young adulthood. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 890–904.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Ehrhart, M. G., Ehrhart, K. H., Roesch, S. C., Chung-Herrera, B. G., Nadler, K., & Bradshaw, K. (2009). Testing the latent factor structure and construct validity of the ten-item personality inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 900–905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, M. W. (1985). Personality and individual differences: A natural science approach. New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Eysenck, S. B. G., Pearson, P. R., Easting, G., & Allsopp, J. F. (1985). Age norms for impulsiveness, venturesomeness and empathy in adults. Personality and Individual Differences, 6, 613–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Farrington, D. P. (1995). Development of offending and antisocial behaviour from childhood: Key findings from the Cambridge Study in Delinquent Development. Journal of Child Psychology, 360, 929–964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ferrey, A. E., & Mishra, S. (2014). Compensation method affects risk-taking in the Balloon Analogue Risk Task. Personality and Individual Differences, 64, 111–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ferris, J., & Wynne, H. (2001). The Canadian Problem Gambling Index: Final report (Submitted to the Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse). Ottawa, ON: Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse.Google Scholar
  19. Fessler, D. M. T., Pillsworth, E. G., & Flamson, T. J. (2004). Angry men and disgusted women: An evolutionary approach to the influence of emotions on risk-taking. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 95, 107–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Friedman, M., & Savage, L. J. (1948). The utility analysis of choice involving risk. Journal of Political Economy, 56, 279–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gneezy, U., & Rustichini, A. (2000). Pay enough or don’t pay at all. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115, 791–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gomà-i-Freixanet, M. (1995). Prosocial and antisocial aspects of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 19, 125–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gomà-i-Freixanet, M. (2001). Prosocial and antisocial aspects of personality in women: A replication study. Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 1401–1411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, P. J., & Swann, W. B, Jr. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 504–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gottfredson, M. R., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Grasmick, H. J., Tittle, C. R., Bursik, R. J, Jr, & Arneklev, B. J. (1993). Testing the core empirical implications of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 30, 5–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hanoch, Y., Johnson, J. G., & Wilke, A. (2006). Domain specificity in experimental measures and participant recruitment: An application to risk-taking behavior. Psychological Science, 17, 300–304.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., & Quinsey, V. L. (1994). Psychopathy as a taxon: Evidence that psychopaths are a discrete class. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, 387–397.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Hirschi, T., & Gottfredson, M. R. (1994). The generality of deviance. In T. Hirschi & M. R. Gottfredson (Eds.), The generality of deviance. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  30. Jones, S., & Quisenberry, N. (2004). The general theory of crime: How general is it? Deviant Behavior, 25, 401–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Junger, M., & Tremblay, R. E. (1999). Self-control, accidents and crime. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 26, 485–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lalumière, M. L., Harris, G. T., Quinsey, V. L., & Rice, M. E. (2005). The causes of rape: Understanding individual differences in male propensity of sexual aggression. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lalumière, M. L., & Quinsey, V. L. (1996). Sexual deviance, antisociality, mating effort, and the use of sexually coercive behaviors. Personality and Individual Differences, 21, 33–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lejuez, C. W., Read, J. P., Wahler, C. W., Richards, J. B., Ramsey, S. E., Stuart, G. L., et al. (2002). Evaluation of a behavioral measure of risk-taking: The Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 8, 75–84.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Levenson, M. R. (1990). Risk taking and personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 1073–1080.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Levenson, M. R., Kiehl, K. A., & Fitzpatrick, C. M. (1995). Assessing psychopathic attributes in a noninstitutionalized population. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 151–158.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Lynam, D. R., Whiteside, S., & Jones, S. (1999). Self-reported psychopathy: A validation study. Journal of Personality Assessment, 73, 110–132.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. MacLaren, V. V., Best, L. A., Dixon, M. J., & Harrigan, K. A. (2011). Problem gambling and the five factor model in university students. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 335–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Marcus, B. (2003). An empirical examination of the construct validity of two alternative self-control measures. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 674–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Miller, J. D., MacKillop, J., Fortune, E. E., Maples, J., Lance, C. E., Campbell, W. K., & Goodie, A. S. (2013). Personality correlates of pathological gambling derived from Big Three and Big Five personality models. Psychiatry Research, 206, 50–55.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Mishra, S. (2014). Decision-making under risk: Integrating perspectives from biology, economics, and psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 18, 280–307.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Mishra, S., Barclay, P., & Sparks, A. (in press). The relative state model: Integrating need-based and ability-based pathways to risk-taking. Personality and Social Psychology Review. Google Scholar
  43. Mishra, S., & Carleton, R. N. (2015). Subjective relative deprivation is associated with poorer physical and mental health. Social Science and Medicine, 147, 144–149.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Mishra, S., & Lalumière, M. L. (2009). Is the crime drop of the 1990s in Canada and the USA associated with a general decline in risky and health-related behaviors? Social Science and Medicine, 68, 39–48.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Mishra, S., & Lalumière, M. L. (2010). You can’t always get what you want: The motivational effect of need on risk-sensitive decision-making. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 605–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mishra, S., Lalumière, M. L., Morgan, M., & Williams, R. J. (2011a). An examination of the relationship between gambling and antisocial behavior. Journal of Gambling Studies, 27, 409–426.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Mishra, S., Lalumière, M. L., & Williams, R. J. (2010a). Gambling as a form of risk-taking: Individual differences in personality, risk-accepting attitudes, and behavioral preferences for risk. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 616–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Mishra, S., Logue, D. M., Abiola, I. O., & Cade, W. H. (2011b). Developmental environment affects risk-acceptance in the hissing cockroach, Gromphadorhina portentosa. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 125, 40–47.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Mishra, S., Morgan, M., Lalumière, M. L., & Williams, R. J. (2010b). Mood and audience effects on video lottery terminal gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies26, 373–386.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Mishra, S., & Novakowski, D. (2016). Personal relative deprivation and risk: An examination of individual differences in personality, attitudes, and behavioral outcomes. Personality and Individual Differences, 90, 22–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Moffitt, T. E., Arsenault, L., Belsky, D., Dickson, N., Hancox, R. J., & Caspi, A. (2011). A gradient of childhood self-control predicts health, wealth, and public safety. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 108, 2693–2698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Moffitt, T. E., Caspi, A., Harrington, H., & Milne, B. J. (2002). Males on the life-course-persistent and adolescence-limited antisocial pathways: Follow-up at age 26 years. Development and Psychopathology, 1, 179–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Moffitt, T. E., & Silva, P. A. (1988). Self-reported delinquency: Results from an instrument for New Zealand. Australia and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 21, 227–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349, 943–951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Orford, J., Wardle, H., Griffiths, M., Sproston, K., & Erens, B. (2010). PGSI and DSM-IV in the 2007 British Gambling Prevalence Survey: Reliability, item response, factor structure, and inter-scale agreement. International Gambling Studies, 10, 31–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Osgood, D. W., Johnston, L. D., O’Malley, P. M., & Bachman, J. G. (1988). The generality of deviance in late adolescence and early adulthood. American Sociological Review, 53, 81–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Pashler, H., & Wagenmakers, E. (2012). Editor’s introduction to the special section on replicability in psychological science: A crisis of confidence? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 528–530.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Pratt, J. W. (1964). Risk aversion in the small and in the large. Econometrica, 32, 122–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Rode, C., Cosmides, L., Hell, W., & Tooby, J. (1999). When and why do people avoid unknown probabilities in decisions under uncertainty? Testing some predictions from optimal foraging theory. Cognition, 72, 269–304.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Simonsohn, U. (2015). Small telescopes: Detectability and the evaluation of replication results. Psychological Science, 26, 559–569.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Slovic, P. (1964). Assessment of risk taking behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 61, 330–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Smith, G., Wynne, H., & Hartnagel, T. (2003). Examining police records to assess gambling impacts: A study of gambling-related crime in the city of Edmonton. Edmonton, Canada: Alberta Gaming Research Institute.Google Scholar
  64. Stinchfield, R. (2004). Demographic, psychosocial, and behavioural factors associated with youth gambling and problem gambling. In J. L. Derevensky & R. Gupta (Eds.), Gambling problems in youth: Theoretical and applied perspectives. New York: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  65. Stinchfield, R., McCready, J., Turner, N. E., Jiminez-Murcia, S., Petry, N. M., Grant, J., et al. (in press). Reliability, validity, and classification accuracy of the DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for gambling disorder and comparison to DSM-IV. Journal of Gambling Studies.Google Scholar
  66. Toneatto, T., & Nguyen, L. (2007). Individual characteristics and problem gambling behavior. In G. Smith, D. C. Hodgins, & R. J. Williams (Eds.), Research and measurement Issues in gambling studies (pp. 279–303). Amsterdam: Elsevier.  Google Scholar
  67. Turner, N. E., Preston, D. L., McAvoy, S., & Saunders, C. (2007). Problem gambling in Canadian federal offenders: Prevalence, comorbidity, and correlates (Submitted to the Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre). Guelph, ON: Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre.Google Scholar
  68. Vitaro, F., Brendgen, M., Ladouceur, R., & Tremblay, R. E. (2001). Gambling, delinquency, and drug use during adolescence: Mutual influences and common risk factors. Journal of Gambling Studies, 17, 171–190.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Williams, R. J., Royston, J., & Hagen, B. F. (2005). Gambling and problem gambling within forensic populations: A review of literature. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 32, 665–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Williams, R. J., & Volberg, R. A. (2014). Classification accurancy of four problem gambling assessment instruments. International Gambling Studies, 14, 15–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Wood, A. P., Dawe, S., & Gullo, M. J. (2013). The role of personality, family influences, and prosocial risk-taking behavior on substance use in early adolescence. Journal of Adolescence, 36, 871–881.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Zuckerman, M. (1994). Behavioural expressions and biosocial bases of sensation-seeking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  73. Zuckerman, M. (2007). Sensation seeking and risky behavior. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sandeep Mishra
    • 1
  • Martin L. Lalumière
    • 2
  • Robert J. Williams
    • 3
  1. 1.Faculty of Business AdministrationUniversity of ReginaReginaCanada
  2. 2.University of OttawaOttawaCanada
  3. 3.University of LethbridgeLethbridgeCanada

Personalised recommendations