Problem Gambling Family Impacts: Development of the Problem Gambling Family Impact Scale
- 1.3k Downloads
Although family members of problem gamblers frequently present to treatment services, problem gambling family impacts are under-researched. The most commonly endorsed items on a new measure of gambling-related family impacts [Problem Gambling Family Impact Measure (PG-FIM: Problem Gambler version)] by 212 treatment-seeking problem gamblers included trust (62.5 %), anger (61.8 %), depression or sadness (58.7 %), anxiety (57.7 %), distress due to gambling-related absences (56.1 %), reduced quality time (52.4 %), and communication breakdowns (52.4 %). The PG-FIM (Problem Gambler version) was comprised of three factors: (1) financial impacts, (2) increased responsibility impacts, and (3) psychosocial impacts with good psychometric properties. Younger, more impulsive, non-electronic gaming machine (EGM) gamblers who had more severe gambling problems reported more financial impacts; non-EGM gamblers with poorer general health reported more increased responsibility impacts; and more impulsive non-EGM gamblers with more psychological distress and higher gambling severity reported more psychosocial impacts. The findings have implications for the development of interventions for the family members of problem gamblers.
KeywordsGambling Family Significant others Impact Counselling Treatment
This manuscript presents secondary analysis of data from research on problem gambling and family violence funded by the Australian Research Council (Linkage Grant LP 0989331) with the Office for Problem Gambling, South Australia and Drummond Street Services, Victoria as industry partners; and the Problem Gambling Research and Treatment Centre at the University of Melbourne. The research team would like to acknowledge the effort of the participating agencies in Victoria, South Australia and Tasmania, and the clients who participated in the study.
- Babor, T. F., Higgins-Biddle, J. C., Saunders, J. B., & Monteiro, M. G. (2001). The alcohol use disorders identification test: Guidelines for use in primary care. Geneva: World Health Organisation. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2001/who_msd_msb_01.6a.pdf.
- Bellringer, M., Pulford, J., Abbott, M., DeSouza, R., & Clarke, D. (2008). Problem gambling: Barriers to help seeking behaviours. Auckland: Gambling Research Centre, Auckland University of Technology. http://www.moh.govt.nz/moh.nsf/indexmh/problemgamblingresearch-implementation0407-barriers.
- Bush, K., Kivlahan, D. R., McDonell, M. B., Fihn, S. D., & Bradley, K. A. (1998). The AUDIT alcohol consumption questions (AUDIT-C): An effective brief screening test for problem drinking. Archives of Internal Medicine, 158(16), 1789–1795. doi: 10.1001/archinte.158.16.1789.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Christensen, D. R., Dowling, N. A., Jackson, A. C., & Thomas, S. A. (2014). Gambling participation and problem gambling severity in a stratified random survey: Findings from the second social and economic impact study of gambling in Tasmania. Journal of Gambling Studies. doi: 10.1007/s10899-014-9495-9.
- Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 10(7), 1–9.Google Scholar
- Dawson, D. A., Grant, B. F., Stinson, F. S., & Zhou, Y. (2005). Effectiveness of the derived alcohol use disorders identification test (AUDIT-C) in screening for alcohol use disorders and risk drinking in the US general population. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research, 29(5), 844–854. doi: 10.1097/01.ALC.0000164374.32229.A2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- De Vellis, R. F. (1992). Scale development: Theory and applications. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
- Dowling, N. A., Jackson, A. C., Thomas, S. A., & Frydenberg, E. (2010). Children at risk of developing problem gambling. Melbourne: Gambling Research Australia. http://www.gamblingresearch.org.au/home/research/gra+research+reports/children+at+risk+of+developing+problem+gambling+%282010%29.
- Dowling, N. A., Suomi, A., Jackson, A. C., Lavis, T., Patford, J., Cockman, S., et al. (2014). Problem gambling and intimate partner violence: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Trauma, Violence, and Abuse. doi: 10.1177/1524838014561269.
- Ferris, J., & Wynne, H. (2001). The Canadian problem gambling index: Final report. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse.Google Scholar
- Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Gratz, K. L., & Roemer, L. (2004). Multidimensional assessment of emotion regulation and dysregulation: Development, factor structure, and initial validation of the difficulties in emotion regulation scale. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 26(1), 41–54. doi: 10.1007/s10862-008-9102-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hallgren, K. A. (2012). Computing inter-rater reliability for observational data: An overview and tutorial. Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 8(1), 23–34.Google Scholar
- Kessler, R. C., Andrews, G., Colpe, L. J., Hiripi, E., Mroczek, D. K., Normand, S. L., et al. (2002). Short screening scales to monitor population prevalences and trends in non-specific psychological distress. Psychological Medicine, 32(6), 959–976. doi: 10.1017/S0033291702006074.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Murphy, B., Herrman, H., Hawthorne, G., Pinzone, T., & Evert, H. (2000). Australian WHOQoL instruments: User’s manual and interpretation guide. Melbourne: Australian WHOQOL Field Study Centre.Google Scholar
- Neal, P., Delfabbro, P., & O’Neil, M. (2005). Problem gambling and harm: Towards a national definition. Adelaide: South Australia Centre for Economic Studies. https://www.adelaide.edu.au/saces/gambling/publications/ProblemGamblingAndHarmTowardNationalDefinition.pdf.
- Neuendorf, K. A. (2002). The content analysis guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Orford, J., Templeton, L., Velleman, R., & Copello, A. (2005). Family members of relatives with alcohol, drug and gambling problems: A set of standardized questionnaires for assessing stress, coping and strain. Addiction, 100, 1611–1624. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01178.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Productivity Commission. (2010). Gambling, report no. 50. Canberra: Author.Google Scholar
- Steinberg, L., Albert, D., Cauffman, E., Banich, M., Graham, S., & Woolard, J. (2008). Age differences in sensation seeking and impulsivity as indexed by behaviour and self-report: Evidence for a dual systems model. Developmental Psychology, 44(6), 1764–1778. doi: 10.1037/a0012955.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Suomi, A., Jackson, A. C., Dowling, N. A., Lavis, T., Patford, J., Thomas, S. A., et al. (2013). Problem gambling and family violence: Family member reports of prevalence, family impacts and family coping. Asian Journal of Gambling Issues and Public Health, 3(13), 1–15. doi: 10.1186/2195-3007-3-13.Google Scholar
- Ware, J., & Sherbourne, D. (1992). The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). Medical Care, 30, 473–483. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3765916.