Journal of Gambling Studies

, Volume 32, Issue 3, pp 935–955 | Cite as

Problem Gambling Family Impacts: Development of the Problem Gambling Family Impact Scale

  • N. A. Dowling
  • A. Suomi
  • A. C. Jackson
  • T. Lavis
Original Paper

Abstract

Although family members of problem gamblers frequently present to treatment services, problem gambling family impacts are under-researched. The most commonly endorsed items on a new measure of gambling-related family impacts [Problem Gambling Family Impact Measure (PG-FIM: Problem Gambler version)] by 212 treatment-seeking problem gamblers included trust (62.5 %), anger (61.8 %), depression or sadness (58.7 %), anxiety (57.7 %), distress due to gambling-related absences (56.1 %), reduced quality time (52.4 %), and communication breakdowns (52.4 %). The PG-FIM (Problem Gambler version) was comprised of three factors: (1) financial impacts, (2) increased responsibility impacts, and (3) psychosocial impacts with good psychometric properties. Younger, more impulsive, non-electronic gaming machine (EGM) gamblers who had more severe gambling problems reported more financial impacts; non-EGM gamblers with poorer general health reported more increased responsibility impacts; and more impulsive non-EGM gamblers with more psychological distress and higher gambling severity reported more psychosocial impacts. The findings have implications for the development of interventions for the family members of problem gamblers.

Keywords

Gambling Family Significant others Impact Counselling Treatment 

References

  1. Abbott, D. A., & Cramer, S. (1993). Gambling attitudes and participation: A Midwestern survey. Journal of Gambling Studies, 9, 247–265. doi:10.1007/BF01015921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andrews, G., & Slade, T. (2001). Interpreting scores of the Kessler psychological distress scale (K10). Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 25, 494–497. doi:10.1111/j.1467-842X.2001.tb00310.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Babor, T. F., Higgins-Biddle, J. C., Saunders, J. B., & Monteiro, M. G. (2001). The alcohol use disorders identification test: Guidelines for use in primary care. Geneva: World Health Organisation. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2001/who_msd_msb_01.6a.pdf.
  4. Bellringer, M., Pulford, J., Abbott, M., DeSouza, R., & Clarke, D. (2008). Problem gambling: Barriers to help seeking behaviours. Auckland: Gambling Research Centre, Auckland University of Technology. http://www.moh.govt.nz/moh.nsf/indexmh/problemgamblingresearch-implementation0407-barriers.
  5. Bowling, A. (2005). Just one question: If one question works, why ask several? Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 59, 342–345. doi:10.1136/jech.2004.021204.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Bradley, K. A., DeBenedetti, A. F., Volk, R. J., Williams, E. C., Frank, D., et al. (2007). AUDIT-C as a brief screen for alcohol misuse in primary care. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research, 31(7), 1208–1217. doi:10.1111/j.1530-0277.2007.00403.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bryant, F. B., & Smith, B. D. (2001). Refining the architecture of aggression: A measurement model for the Buss–Perry Aggression Questionnaire. Journal of Research in Personality, 35, 138–167. doi:10.1006/jrpe.2000.2302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bush, K., Kivlahan, D. R., McDonell, M. B., Fihn, S. D., & Bradley, K. A. (1998). The AUDIT alcohol consumption questions (AUDIT-C): An effective brief screening test for problem drinking. Archives of Internal Medicine, 158(16), 1789–1795. doi:10.1001/archinte.158.16.1789.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Buss, A. H., & Perry, M. (1992). The Aggression Questionnaire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(3), 452–459. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.63.3.452.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Christensen, D. R., Dowling, N. A., Jackson, A. C., & Thomas, S. A. (2014). Gambling participation and problem gambling severity in a stratified random survey: Findings from the second social and economic impact study of gambling in Tasmania. Journal of Gambling Studies. doi:10.1007/s10899-014-9495-9.
  11. Clifford, G. (2008). The evolution of problem gambling helplines. In M. Zangeneh, A. Blaszczynski, & N. Turner (Eds.), In the pursuit of winning (pp. 291–312). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 10(7), 1–9.Google Scholar
  13. Crisp, B. R., Thomas, S. A., Jackson, A. C., & Thomason, N. (2001). Partners of problem gamblers who present for counselling: Demographic profile and presenting problems. Journal of Family Studies, 7, 208–216. doi:10.5172/jfs.7.2.208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Darbyshire, P., Oster, C., & Carrig, H. (2001). The experience of pervasive loss: Children and young people living in a family where parental gambling is pathological. Journal of Gambling Studies, 17, 23–45. doi:10.1023/A:1014536315167.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Dawson, D. A., Grant, B. F., Stinson, F. S., & Zhou, Y. (2005). Effectiveness of the derived alcohol use disorders identification test (AUDIT-C) in screening for alcohol use disorders and risk drinking in the US general population. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research, 29(5), 844–854. doi:10.1097/01.ALC.0000164374.32229.A2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. De Vellis, R. F. (1992). Scale development: Theory and applications. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  17. Dickinson, J. A., Wiggers, J., Leeder, S. R., & Sanson-Fisher, R. W. (1989). General practitioners’ detection of patients’ smoking status. The Medical Journal of Australia, 150(8), 420–426. doi:10.1186/s12875-015-0228-7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Dowling, N. A. (2013). The cognitive-behavioural treatment of female problem gambling. In D. Richard, A. Blaszczynski, & L. Nower (Eds.), The Wiley–Blackwell handbook of disordered gambling (pp. 225–250). West Sussex: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dowling, N. A., Jackson, A. C., Suomi, A., Lavis, T., Koziol-McLain, J., Thomas, S. A., et al. (2014a). Problem gambling and family violence: Prevalence and patterns in treatment-seekers populations. Addictive Behaviors, 39, 1713–1717. doi:10.1186/2195-3007-3-13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Dowling, N. A., Jackson, A. C., Thomas, S. A., & Frydenberg, E. (2010). Children at risk of developing problem gambling. Melbourne: Gambling Research Australia. http://www.gamblingresearch.org.au/home/research/gra+research+reports/children+at+risk+of+developing+problem+gambling+%282010%29.
  21. Dowling, N. A., Rodda, S. N., Lubman, D. I., & Jackson, A. C. (2014b). The impacts of problem gambling on concerned significant others accessing web-based counselling. Addictive Behaviors, 39(8), 1253–1257. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2014.04.011.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Dowling, N., Smith, D., & Thomas, T. (2005). Electronic gaming machines: Are they the “crack-cocaine” of gambling? Addiction, 100, 33–45. doi:10.1111/j.13600443.2004.00962.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Dowling, N., Smith, D., & Thomas, T. (2009). The family functioning of female pathological gamblers. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 7(1), 29–44. doi:10.1007/s11469-007-9126-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dowling, N. A., Suomi, A., Jackson, A. C., Lavis, T., Patford, J., Cockman, S., et al. (2014). Problem gambling and intimate partner violence: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Trauma, Violence, and Abuse. doi:10.1177/1524838014561269.
  25. Ferris, J., & Wynne, H. (2001). The Canadian problem gambling index: Final report. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse.Google Scholar
  26. Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  27. Gratz, K. L., & Roemer, L. (2004). Multidimensional assessment of emotion regulation and dysregulation: Development, factor structure, and initial validation of the difficulties in emotion regulation scale. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 26(1), 41–54. doi:10.1007/s10862-008-9102-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Griffiths, M., Scarfe, A., & Bellringer, P. (1999). The UK National Telephone Gambling Helpline: Results on the first year of operation. Journal of Gambling Studies, 15, 83–90. doi:10.1023/A:1023071113879.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Hallgren, K. A. (2012). Computing inter-rater reliability for observational data: An overview and tutorial. Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 8(1), 23–34.Google Scholar
  30. Hing, N., Tiyce, M., Holdsworth, L., & Nuske, E. (2013). All in the family: Help-seeking by significant others of problem gamblers. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 11, 1–13. doi:10.1007/s11469-012-9423-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hodgins, D. C., Shead, N. W., & Makarchuk, K. (2007a). Relationship satisfaction and psychological distress among concerned significant others of pathological gamblers. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 195, 65–71. doi:10.1097/01.nmd.0000252382.47434.a6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Hodgins, D. C., Toneatto, T., Makarchuk, K., Skinner, W., & Vincent, S. (2007b). Minimal treatment approaches for concerned significant others of problem gamblers: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Gambling Studies, 23, 215–230. doi:10.1007/s10899-006-9052-2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Kalischuk, R., Nowatzki, N., Cardwell, K., Klein, K., & Solowoniuk, J. (2006). Problem gambling and its impact on families: A literature review. International Gambling Studies, 6, 31–60. doi:10.1080/14459790600644176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kessler, R. C., Andrews, G., Colpe, L. J., Hiripi, E., Mroczek, D. K., Normand, S. L., et al. (2002). Short screening scales to monitor population prevalences and trends in non-specific psychological distress. Psychological Medicine, 32(6), 959–976. doi:10.1017/S0033291702006074.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Kessler, R. C., Barker, P. R., Colpe, L. J., Epstein, J. F., Gfroerer, J. C., Hiripi, E., et al. (2003). Screening for serious mental illness in the general population. Archives of General Psychiatry, 60, 184–189. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.60.2.184.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Kirby, K. C., Dugosh, K. L., Benishek, L. A., & Harrington, V. M. (2005). The significant other checklist: Measuring the problems experienced by family members of drug users. Addictive Behaviors, 30, 29–47. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2004.04.010.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Makarchuk, K., Hodgins, D. C., & Peden, N. (2002). Development of a brief intervention for concerned significant others of problem gamblers. Addictive Disorders and their Treatment, 1, 126–134. doi:10.1097/00132576-200211000-00003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McMillen, J., & Wenzel, M. (2006). Measuring problem gambling: Assessment of three prevalence screens. International Gambling Studies, 6(2), 147–174. doi:10.1080/14459790600927845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Murphy, B., Herrman, H., Hawthorne, G., Pinzone, T., & Evert, H. (2000). Australian WHOQoL instruments: User’s manual and interpretation guide. Melbourne: Australian WHOQOL Field Study Centre.Google Scholar
  40. Neal, P., Delfabbro, P., & O’Neil, M. (2005). Problem gambling and harm: Towards a national definition. Adelaide: South Australia Centre for Economic Studies. https://www.adelaide.edu.au/saces/gambling/publications/ProblemGamblingAndHarmTowardNationalDefinition.pdf.
  41. Neuendorf, K. A. (2002). The content analysis guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  42. Oei, T. P. S., & Raylu, N. (2004). Familial influence on offspring gambling: A cognitive mechanism for transmission of gambling behavior in families. Psychological Medicine, 34(7), 1279–1288. doi:10.1017/S0033291704003150.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Orford, J., Templeton, L., Velleman, R., & Copello, A. (2005). Family members of relatives with alcohol, drug and gambling problems: A set of standardized questionnaires for assessing stress, coping and strain. Addiction, 100, 1611–1624. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01178.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Patford, J. (2007). The yoke of care: How parents and parents-in-law experience, understand and respond to adult children’s gambling problems. Australian Journal of Primary Health, 13, 59–68. doi:10.1071/PY07039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Productivity Commission. (2010). Gambling, report no. 50. Canberra: Author.Google Scholar
  46. Rodda, S. N., & Lubman, D. I. (2014). Characteristics of gamblers using a national online counselling service for problem gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 30(2), 277–289. doi:10.1007/s10899-012-9352-7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Rodda, S., Lubman, D. I., Dowling, N. A., & McCann, T. V. (2013). Reasons for using web-based counselling among family and friends impacted by problem gambling. Asian Journal of Gambling Issues and Public Health, 3, 12. doi:10.1186/2195-3007-3-12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rychtarik, R., & McGillicuddy, N. (2006). Preliminary evaluation of a coping skills training program for those with a pathological-gambling partner. Journal of Gambling Studies, 22, 165–178. doi:10.1007/s10899-006-9008-6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Stein, R. E. K., & Riessman, C. K. (1980). The development of the Impact on Family Scale: Preliminary findings. Medical Care, 18, 465–472. doi:10.1097/00005650-198004000-00010.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Steinberg, L., Albert, D., Cauffman, E., Banich, M., Graham, S., & Woolard, J. (2008). Age differences in sensation seeking and impulsivity as indexed by behaviour and self-report: Evidence for a dual systems model. Developmental Psychology, 44(6), 1764–1778. doi:10.1037/a0012955.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Suomi, A., Jackson, A. C., Dowling, N. A., Lavis, T., Patford, J., Thomas, S. A., et al. (2013). Problem gambling and family violence: Family member reports of prevalence, family impacts and family coping. Asian Journal of Gambling Issues and Public Health, 3(13), 1–15. doi:10.1186/2195-3007-3-13.Google Scholar
  52. Svensson, J., Romild, U., & Shepherdson, E. (2013). The concerned significant others of people with gambling problems in a national representative sample in Sweden: A one-year follow-up study. BMC Public Health, 13, 1087. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-13-1087.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  53. Vitaro, F., Wanner, B., Brendgen, M., & Tremblay, R. E. (2008). Offspring of parents with gambling problems: Adjustment problems and explanatory mechanisms. Journal of Gambling Studies, 24, 535–553. doi:10.1007/s10899-008-9096-6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Ware, J., & Sherbourne, D. (1992). The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). Medical Care, 30, 473–483. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3765916.
  55. Wenzel, H. G., Oren, A., & Bakken, I. J. (2008). Gambling problems in the family: A stratified probability sample study of prevalence and reported consequences. BMC Public Health, 8, 412. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-8-412.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  56. Who ASSIST Working Group. (2002). The alcohol, smoking and substance involvement screening test (ASSIST): Development, reliability, and feasibility. Addiction, 97, 1183–1194. doi:10.1046/j.1360-0443.2002.00185.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wood, R. T. A., & Griffiths, M. (2007). Online guidance, advice and support for problem gamblers and concerned relatives and friends: An evaluation of the GamAid pilot service. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 35, 373–389. doi:10.1080/03069880701593540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. A. Dowling
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
  • A. Suomi
    • 1
    • 4
  • A. C. Jackson
    • 2
  • T. Lavis
    • 5
    • 6
  1. 1.School of PsychologyDeakin UniversityBurwoodAustralia
  2. 2.Melbourne Graduate School of EducationUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia
  3. 3.School of Psychological SciencesMonash UniversityClaytonAustralia
  4. 4.Centre for Gambling Research, School of SociologyAustralian National UniversityCanberraAustralia
  5. 5.Student Learning CentreFlinders UniversityBedford ParkAustralia
  6. 6.School of MedicineFlinders UniversityBedford ParkAustralia

Personalised recommendations