Advertisement

Journal of Gambling Studies

, Volume 32, Issue 2, pp 737–747 | Cite as

Bookmakers and a Duty of Care: Customers’ Views in England

  • Graham Brooks
  • Paul Sparrow
Original Paper

Abstract

This paper focuses on customers’ views on the extent that bookmakers and individuals are responsible for a duty of care. 72 participants from seven bookmakers in one city in England were interviewed that illustrates customers expect bookmakers to take ‘reasonable steps’ to avoid exploiting all customers. However, the customers’ views recorded in this paper illustrate a range of views on what a duty of care should actually comprise with differences of opinion on the level of bookmakers and individuals level of responsibility, dealing with intoxicated customers, illegal gambling, prevention of excessive and problem gambling and self-exclusion.

Keywords

Bookmakers Gambling Duty of care Self-exclusion Profit 

References

  1. Bauer, J. (2006). Self-exclusion and the problem gambler: The house shouldn’t always win. Northern Illinois University Law Review, 27, 63–93.Google Scholar
  2. Belaisha, B. B., & Brooks, G. (2014). Money laundering in Dubai: Strategies and future directions. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 17(3), 343–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bernardi, S., & Pallanti, S. (2009). Internet addiction: A descriptive clinical study focusing on comorbidities and dissociative symptoms. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 50(6), 510–516.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Blaszczynski, A. (2005). To formulate gambling policies on the premise that problem gambling is an addiction may be premature. Addiction, 100, 1230–1231.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Blaszczynski, A., & McConaghy, N. (1994). Criminal offences in gamblers anonymous and hospital treated pathological gamblers. Journal of Gambling Studies, 10(2), 99–127.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Brooks, G. (2012). Online gambling and money laundering: Views from the inside. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 15(3), 304–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brooks, G., & Blaszczynski, A. (2011). Judicial decisions on cases involving problem gambling and crime in England and Wales. International Gambling Studies, 11(1), 81–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bulmer, M. (2003). Sociological research methods: An introduction. NJ: Transactions Press.Google Scholar
  9. Calvert v William Hill Credit Ltd. (2008). England and Wales High Court (Chancery Division) Decisions. London: Courts of Justice.Google Scholar
  10. Cameron, J. (2007). Problem gamblers and the duty of care: A response to Sasso and Kalajdzic’. Gaming Law Review, 11(5), 554–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Collins, P., & Kelly, J. (2002). Problem gambling and self-exclusion: A report to the South African responsible gambling trust. Gaming Law Review, 6(6), 517–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Corney, R., & Davis, J. (2010). The attractions and risks of internet gambling for women: A qualitative study. Journal of Gambling Issues: Issue, 24, 121–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Crofts, P. (2003). Problem gambling and property offences: An analysis of court files. International Gambling Studies, 3(2), 183–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Crowne, E. (2008). The problem with problem gaming: A response to Sasso and Kalajdzic, in defense of the gaming industry. Gaming Law Review and Economics, 12(4), 340–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Faregh, N., & Leth-Steensen, C. (2009). Reflection on the voluntary self exclusion of gamblers and the law suits against ontario lottery and gaming corporation. Journal of Gambling Studies, 25(2), 131–138.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Farooq, K., & Brooks, G. (2013). Arab fraud and corruption professionals’ views in the Arabian Gulf. Journal of Financial Crime, 20(3), 338–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fernandez-Alba, A., & Labrador, F. (2005). Socio-demographic, psychopathological and clinical characteristics of pathological slot-machine gamblers in treatment: A descriptive study of Spanish male gamblers. International Gambling Studies, 5(1), 113–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gainsbury, S. M. (2014). Review of self exclusion from gambling venues as an intervention for problem gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 30(2), 229–251.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Gambling Commission. (2012). Survey data on gambling participation. Birmingham, UK: Gambling Commission.Google Scholar
  20. Gambling Commission. (2014). Gambling codes of practice: Consolidated for all forms of gambling. Birmingham, UK: Gambling Commission.Google Scholar
  21. Hayer, T., & Meyer, G. (2011). Self-exclusion as a harm minimisation strategy: Evidence for the casino sector from selected European countries. Journal of Gambling Studies, 27(4), 685–700.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Kalajdzic, J. (2008). Cameron’s rejection of a duty of care to problem gamblers: A problematic defense of ontario’s gaming industry’. Gaming Law Review, 12(1), 55–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ladouceur, R., Jacques, C., Giroux, I., Ferland, F., & LeBlond, J. (2000). Brief communications analysis of a casino’s self-exclusion program. Journal of Gambling Studies, 16(4), 453–460.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Ladouceur, R., Sylvain, C., & Gosselin, P. (2007). Self-exclusion program: A longitudinal evaluation study. Journal of Gambling Studies, 23(1), 85–94.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. McNeilly, D. P., & Burke, W. J. (2000). Late life gambling: The attitudes and behaviours of older adults. Journal of Gambling Studies, 16(4), 393–415.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Meyer, G., & Stadler, M. (1999). Criminal behaviour associated with pathological gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 15(1), 29–43.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Napolitano, F. (2003). The self exclusion program: Legal and clinical consideration. Journal of Gambling Studies, 19(3), 303–315.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Nelson, S. E., Kleschinsky, J. H., LaBrie, R., Kaplan, S., & Shaffe, H. J. (2010). One decade of self exclusion: Missouri casino self excluders four to ten years after enrolment. Journal of Gambling Studies, 26(1), 129–144.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Nelson, S. E., La Plante, D. A., Allyson, A. J., Schumann, A., LaBrie, R., & Shaffer, H. J. (2008). Real limits in the virtual world: Self limiting behaviour of internet gamblers. Journal of Gambling Studies, 24(4), 463–477.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Orford, J. (2001). Excessive appetites: A psychological view of addictions. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  31. Rhea, A. (2005). Voluntary self-exclusion lists: How they work and potential problems. Gaming Law Review, 9(5), 462–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sasso, W. V., & Kalajdzic, J. (2006). Do Ontario and its gaming venues owe a duty of care to problem gamblers? Gaming Law Review, 10(6), 552–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wardle, H., Moody, A., Spence, S., Orford, J., Volberg, R., Jotangia, D., et al. (2011). Gambling prevalence survey. London: NatCen.Google Scholar
  34. Welte, J. W., Barnes, G. M., Wieczorek, W., Tidwell, M. -C. O., & Hoffman, J. H. (2007). Type of gambling and availability as risk factors for problem gambling: A tobit regression analysis by age and gender. International Gambling Studies, 7(2), 183–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Widyanto, L., & Griffiths, M. (2006). ‘Internet addiction’: A critical review. International Journal of Mental health and Addiction, 4(1), 31–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Law, Social Sciences and CommunicationsUniversity of WolverhamptonWolverhamptonUK

Personalised recommendations