A Case of Mistaken Identity? A Comparison of Professional and Amateur Problem Gamblers
Professional gamblers are more likely than amateur gamblers to meet criteria for problem gambling but minimal research has examined their gambling behavior and its consequences. This study compared gambling behavior, problem gambling symptoms, related harms, recognition, and help-seeking among problem semi/professional gamblers (PPGs/PSPGs) and problem amateur gamblers (PAGs). Surveys completed by 57 self-identified professional gamblers, 311 semi-professional gamblers and 4226 amateur gamblers were analysed. PPGs/PSPGs were significantly more likely than PAGs to be male, younger, never married, speak a language other than English at home, and have higher psychological distress, compared to PAGs. PPGs/PSPGs were more likely to gamble more frequently on many skills-based forms, but most also participated in several chance-based forms. PPGs’/PSPGs’ most common problematic gambling form was electronic gaming machines and they were more likely to have problems with sports betting than PAGs. Most PPGs/PSPGs reported coming out behind on all gambling forms over the previous year. PPGs/PSPGs were more likely than PAGs to report chasing losses and numerous detrimental financial gambling consequences. This group’s self-identification as PPGs/PSPGs is clearly inaccurate and perhaps a means to avoid stigma, elevate status and support problem denial. PPGs/PSPGs may represent an extreme example of gamblers with erroneous cognitions and beliefs who lack the required discipline and skill to be successful professional gamblers. The findings identify a group of problem gamblers who may benefit from interventions to dispel their mistaken self-identity, and emphasize the need for more rigorous confirmation of professional gambler status in future research.
KeywordsProfessional gambler Amateur gambler Problem gambling Self-identity Gambling behavior
- Carroll, A., Rodgers, B., Davidson, T., & Sims, S. (2013). Stigma and help-seeking for gambling problems. Canberra: ACT Gambling and Racing Commission.Google Scholar
- Ciarrocchi, J. W. (2001). Counseling problem gamblers: A self-regulation manual for individual and family therapy. Orlando: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Ferris, J., & Wynne, H. (2001). The canadian problem gambling index: Final report. Ottawa: Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse.Google Scholar
- Frances, A., & First, M. B. (2000). Am I okay?: A layman’s guide to the psychiatrist’s bible. New York City: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
- Gainsbury, S. M., Russell, A., Hing, N., Wood, R., Lubman, D. I., & Blaszczynski, A. (2014). The prevalence and determinants of problem gambling in Australia: Assessing the impact of interactive gambling and new technologies. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 28(3), 769–779. doi:10.1037/a0036207.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hing, N., Gainsbury, S. M., Blaszczynski, A., Wood, R., Lubman, D. I., & Russell, A. (2014a). Interactive gambling. Melbourne: Gambling Research Australia.Google Scholar
- Istrate, A.-M. (2011). From pathological to professional: Gambling stories. Journal of Comparative Anthropology and Sociology, 2(2), 49–67.Google Scholar
- McMullan, J.L. (2011). Submission to the joint select committee on gambling reform inquiry into interactive gambling. http://www.aph.gov.au/senate/committee/gamblingreform_ctte/interactive_online_gambling_advertising/submissions.htm. Retrieved 3 Sept 2013.
- Productivity Commission. (1999). Australia’s gambling industries (Report No. 10). Canberra: Ausinfo.Google Scholar