What’s in a Name? Assessing the Accuracy of Self-identifying as a Professional or Semi-Professional Gambler
Growing interest in pursuing a professional gambling career has been accompanied by a rise in individuals self-identifying as professional gamblers. Whether this trend reflects an actual increase in individuals sustaining livelihoods from gambling or inaccurate appropriation of a now glamorized identity is unclear. Adopting a self-image of professional gambler in the absence of ability to earn a sustainable income from the activity may increase risk of problem gambling and deter help-seeking. However, extent of problem gambling in this cohort is uncertain. This study aimed to: (1) determine any differences that might validate the self-reported identity of professional and semi-professional gamblers by investigating characteristics and behaviors that distinguish them from amateur gamblers; and (2) identify characteristics and behaviors that distinguish between self-identified semi-professional/professional gamblers with and without gambling problems. In an online survey of 4,594 Australian gamblers, 1.2 % identified as professional gamblers, 6.8 % as semi-professional gamblers, and 92.0 % as amateur gamblers. Self-identified professional and semi-professional gamblers were distinguished from amateur gamblers by preference for skill-based gambling, higher reported likelihood of winning, and greater use of online gambling and multiple online operators. Two-fifths of professional and three-fifths of semi-professional gamblers scored as moderate risk or problem gamblers, but negative consequences were more likely personal, interpersonal and work/study related, rather than financial. Although results support the general accuracy of self-reported semi/professional gambling status, measures are needed to help semi/professional gamblers distinguish whether their gambling is a problem or profession.
KeywordsProfessional gamblers Semi-professional gamblers Self-identity Self-image Problem gambling Internet gambling
- Carroll, A., Rodgers, B., Davidson, T., & Sims, S. (2013). Stigma and help-seeking for gambling problems. Canberra: ACT Gambling and Racing Commission.Google Scholar
- Cotte, J. (1997). Chances, trances, and lots of slots: Gambling motives and consumption experiences. Journal of Leisure Research, 29(4), 380–406.Google Scholar
- Delfabbro, P. H. (2012). Australasian gambling review (5th ed.). Adelaide: Independent Gambling Authority.Google Scholar
- Ferris, J., & Wynne, H. (2001). The Canadian problem gambling index: Final report. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse.Google Scholar
- Gainsbury, S, Russell, A., Hing, N., Wood, R., Lubman, D., & Blaszczynski, A. (2013). How the Internet is changing gambling: Findings from an Australian prevalence survey. Journal of Gambling Studies. Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s10899-013-9404-7.
- Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays on face to face behavior. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
- Griffiths, M. D., Parke, A., Wood, R., & Parke, J. (2012). Internet gambling: An overview of psychosocial impacts. UNLV Gaming Research & Review Journal, 10(1), 4.Google Scholar
- Herman, R. D. (1967). Gambling as work: A sociological study of the race track. In R. D. Herman (Ed.), Gambling (pp. 87–106). New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
- Lee, J. (2004). Prize and risk-taking strategy in tournaments: Evidence from professional poker players. The Institute for the Study of Labor, discussion paper no. 1345, 1–23.Google Scholar
- McMullan, J. L. (2011). Submission to the Joint Select Committee on Gambling Reform Inquiry into Interactive Gambling. Retrieved 3 September 2013 from: http://www.aph.gov.au/senate/committee/gamblingreform_ctte/interactive_online_gambling_advertising/submissions.htm.
- Productivity Commission (1999). Australia’s gambling industries (Report No. 10). Canberra: Ausinfo.Google Scholar
- Radburn, B., & Horsley, R. (2011). Gamblers, grinders, and mavericks: The use of membership categorisation to manage identity by professional poker players. Journal of Gambling Issues, 26, 30–50.Google Scholar
- Selin, S. W., & Howard, D. R. (1988). Ego involvement and leisure behavior: A conceptual specification. Journal of Leisure Research, 20(3), 237–244.Google Scholar
- Veblen, T. (1899). The theory of the leisure class. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
- Williams, R. J., West, B. L., & Simpson, R. I. (2012). Prevention of problem gambling: A comprehensive review of the evidence and identified best practices. Guelph, ON: Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre.Google Scholar
- Wood, R. T., & Williams, R. J. (2010). Internet gambling: Prevalence, patterns, problems, and policy options. Guelph: Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre.Google Scholar