Journal of Gambling Studies

, Volume 31, Issue 4, pp 1597–1615 | Cite as

Motivational Profiles of Gambling Behavior: Self-determination Theory, Gambling Motives, and Gambling Behavior

  • Lindsey M. Rodriguez
  • Clayton Neighbors
  • Dipali V. Rinker
  • Jennifer L. Tackett
Original Paper
First Online:

Abstract

Gambling among young adults occurs at a higher rate than in the general population and is associated with a host of negative consequences. Self-determination theory (SDT) posits that individuals develop general motivational orientations which predict a range of behavioral outcomes. An autonomy orientation portrays a choiceful perspective facilitating personal growth, whereas a controlled orientation represents a chronic proclivity toward external pressures and a general lack of choice. Further, an impersonal orientation is characterized by alack of intention and feeling despondent and ineffective. Controlled orientation has previously been associated with more frequent and problematic gambling. This research was designed to examine gambling motives as mediators of associations between motivational orientations and gambling behaviors. Undergraduates (N = 252) who met 2+ criteria on the South Oaks Gambling Screen participated in a laboratory survey assessing their motivational orientations, gambling motives, and gambling behavior (quantity, frequency, and problems). Mediation analyses suggested that autonomy was negatively associated with gambling problems through lower levels of chasing and escape motives. Further, controlled orientation was associated with more problems through higher levels of chasing and interest motives. Finally, impersonal orientation was negatively associated with amount won through escape motives. Overall, results support exploring gambling behavior and motives using a SDT framework.

Keywords

College students Self-determination theory Gambling motives Motivational orientation 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Arnett, J. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55(5), 469–480. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.5.469.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Atkins, D. C., & Gallop, R. J. (2007). Rethinking how family researchers model infrequent outcomes: A tutorial on count regression and zero-inflated models. Journal of Family Psychology, 21(4), 726–735.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Barnes, G. M., Welte, J. W., Hoffman, J. H., & Tidwell, M. O. (2010). Comparisons of gambling and alcohol use among college students and non college young people in the United States. Journal of American College Health, 58(5), 443–452.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bland, R. C., Newman, S. C., Orn, H., & Stebelsky, G. (1993). Epidemiology of pathological gambling in Edmonton. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry/La Revue canadienne de psychiatrie, 38(2), 108–112.Google Scholar
  5. Chantal, Y., & Vallerand, R. J. (1996). Skill versus luck: A motivational analysis of gambling involvement. Journal of Gambling Studies, 12(4), 407–418. doi: 10.1007/BF01539185.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Chantal, Y., Vallerand, R. J., & Vallières, E. F. (1995). Motivation and gambling involvement. Journal of Social Psychology, 135(6), 755–763.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Cooper, M. L., Frone, M. R., Russell, M., & Mudar, P. (1995). Drinking to regulate positive and negative emotions: A motivational model of alcohol use. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 990–1005. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.69.5.990.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985a). Intrinsic motivation and self- determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985b). The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 19, 109–134. doi: 10.1016/0092-6566(85)90023-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2002). Handbook of self-determination research. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.Google Scholar
  13. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). A macrotheory of human motivation, development and health. Canadian Psychology, 49, 182–185. doi: 10.1037/a0012801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gerstein, D. R., Volberg, R. A., Toce, M. T., Harwood, H., Johnson, R. A., & Buie, T. (1999). Gambling impact and behavior study: Report to the national gambling impact study commission. Chicago, IL: NORC.Google Scholar
  15. Gupta, R., & Derevensky, J. L. (2000). Adolescents with gambling problems: From research to treatment. Journal of Gambling Studies/Co-Sponsored by The National Council on Problem Gambling and Institute for the Study of Gambling and Commercial Gaming, 16(2–3), 315–342.Google Scholar
  16. Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
  17. Hilbe, J. M. (2011). Negative binomial regression (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hodgins, H. S., Koestner, R., & Duncan, N. (1996). On the compatibility of autonomy and relatedness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(3), 227–237. doi: 10.1177/0146167296223001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Huang, J., Jacobs, D. F., & Derevensky, J. L. (2011). DSM-based problem gambling: Increasing the odds of heavy drinking in a national sample of U.S. college athletes? Journal of Psychiatric Research, 45(3), 302–308. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2010.07.001.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Knee, C. R., & Zuckerman, M. (1998). A nondefensive personality: Autonomy and control as moderators of defensive coping and self-handicapping. Journal of Research in Personality, 32(2), 115–130. doi: 10.1006/jrpe.1997.2207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lambe, L., Mackinnon, S. P., & Stewart, S. H. (2014). Validation of the gambling motives questionnaire in emerging adults. Journal of Gambling Studies, 1–19. doi: 10.1007/s10899-014-9467-0.
  22. Larimer, M. E., Neighbors, C., Lostutter, T. W., Whiteside, U., Cronce, J. M., Kaysen, D., et al. (2012). Brief motivational feedback and cognitive behavioral interventions for prevention of disordered gambling: A randomized clinical trial. Addiction, 107(6), 1148–1158. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03776.x.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Lesieur, H. R., & Blume, S. B. (1987). The south oaks gambling screen (SOGS): A new instrument for the identification of pathological gamblers. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 144(9), 1184–1188.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Lesieur, Henry R., Cross, J., Frank, M., Welch, M., White, C. M., Rubenstein, G., et al. (1991). Gambling and pathological gambling among university students. Addictive Behaviors, 16(6), 517–527. doi: 10.1016/0306-4603(91)90059-Q.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Martin, R. J., Usdan, S., Cremeens, J., & Vail-Smith, K. (2014). Disordered gambling and co-morbidity of psychiatric disorders among college students: An examination of problem drinking, anxiety and depression. Journal of Gambling Studies, 30(2), 321-333. doi: 10.1007/s10899-013-9367-8.
  26. McGrath, D. S., Stewart, S. H., Klein, R. M., & Barrett, S. P. (2010). Self-generated motives for gambling in two population-based samples of gamblers. International Gambling Studies, 10(2), 117–138. doi: 10.1080/14459795.2010.499915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Neighbors, C., & Larimer, M. E. (2004). Self-determination and problem gambling among college students. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23(4), 565–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Neighbors, C., Larimer, M. E., Geisner, I. M., & Knee, C. R. (2004). Feeling controlled and drinking motives among college students: Contingent self-esteem as a mediator. Self and Identity, 3(3), 207–224. doi: 10.1080/13576500444000029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Neighbors, C., Lewis, M. A., Fossos, N., & Grossbard, J. R. (2007). Motivation and risk behaviors: A self-determination perspective. In L. V. Brown (Ed.), Psychology of motivation (pp. 99–113). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  30. Neighbors, C., Lostutter, T. W., Cronce, J. M., & Larimer, M. E. (2002a). Exploring college student gambling motivation. Journal of Gambling Studies, 18(4), 361.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Neighbors, C., Lostutter, T. W., Larimer, M. E., & Takushi, R. Y. (2002b). Measuring gambling outcomes among college students. Journal of Gambling Studies, 18(4), 339.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Neighbors, C., Rodriguez, L. M., Rinker, D. V., Gonzales, R., Agana, M., Tackett, J. L., & Foster, D. W. (under review). Efficacy of personalized normative feedback as a brief intervention for college student gambling: A randomized controlled trial. Submitted for publication at Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. Google Scholar
  33. Neighbors, C., Walker, D. D., & Larimer, M. E. (2003). expectancies and evaluations of alcohol effects among college students: Self-determination as a moderator. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 64(2), 292–300.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Ng, J. Y., Ntoumanis, N., Thøgersen-Ntoumani, C., Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M., Duda, J. L., et al. (2012). Self-determination theory applied to health contexts: A meta-analysis. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(4), 325–340. doi: 10.1177/1745691612447309.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Nowak, D. E., & Aloe, A. M. (2013). The prevalence of pathological gambling among college students: A meta-analytic synthesis, 2005–2013. Journal of Gambling Studies, 1-25. doi: 10.1007/s10899-013-9399-0.
  36. Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). United States of America: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  37. Rosenthal, R. J., & Lorenz, V. C. (1992). The pathological gambler as criminal offender. Comments on evaluation and treatment. The Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 15(3), 647–660.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. L. (1991). Essentials of behavioral research: Methods and data analysis (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  39. Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80(1), 1–28.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Ryan, R. M., Deci, E. L., & Grolnick, W. S. (1995). Autonomy, relatedness, and the self: Their relation to development and psychopathology. In D. Cicchetti & D. J. Cohen (Eds.), Developmental psychopathology (Vol. 1, pp. 618–655)., Theory and methods Oxford England: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  41. Shaffer, H. J., Hall, M. N., & Van der Bilt, J. (1999). Estimating the prevalence of disordered gambling behavior in the United States and Canada: A research synthesis. American Journal of Public Health, 89(9), 1369–1376.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Sheldon, K. M., Ryan, R. M., Rawsthorne, L. J., & Ilardi, B. (1997). Trait self and true self: Cross-role variation in the Big-Five personality traits and its relations with psychological authenticity and subjective well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(6), 1380–1393. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.73.6.1380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Simoneau, H., & Bergeron, J. (2003). Factors affecting motivation during the first six weeks of treatment. Addictive Behaviors, 28(7), 1219–1241. doi: 10.1016/S0306-4603(02)00257-5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Soenens, B., Berzonsky, M. D., Vansteenkiste, M., Beyers, W., & Goossens, L. (2005). Identity styles and causality orientations: In search of the motivational underpinnings of the identity exploration process. European Journal of Personality, 19(5), 427–442. doi: 10.1002/per.551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Stewart, S. H., & Zack, M. (2008). Development and psychometric evaluation of a three-dimensional gambling motives questionnaire. Addiction, 103(7), 1110–1117. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02235.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Stewart, S. H., Zack, M., Collins, P., Klein, R. M., & Fragopoulos, F. (2008). Subtyping pathological gamblers on the basis of affective motivations for gambling: Relations to gambling problems, drinking problems, and affective motivations for drinking. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 22(2), 257–268. doi: 10.1037/0893-164X.22.2.257.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Stuart, S., Stewart, S. H., Wall, A. M., & Katz, J. (2008). Gambling among university undergraduate students: An investigation of gambler subtypes varying in affective motivations for gambling. In M. J. Esposito (Ed.), Psychology of gambling (pp. 83–110). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Biomedical Books.Google Scholar
  48. Thompson, W. N., Gazel, R., & Rickman, D. (1996). The social costs of gambling in Wisconsin. Wisconsin Policy Research Institute Report, 9, 1–44.Google Scholar
  49. Wallston, K. A. (2001). Control beliefs. In N. Smelser & P. Baltes (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 2724–2726). Oxford, England: Elsevier Science.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Weatherly, J. N., & Miller, K. B. (2013). Exploring the factors related to endorsing gambling as an escape. International Gambling Studies, 13, 52–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Welte, J. W., Barnes, G. M., Tidwell, M. C. O., & Hoffman, J. H. (2009). The association of form of gambling with problem gambling among American youth. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 23, 105-112. doi: 10.1037/a0013536.
  52. Williams, G. C., Cox, E. M., Hedberg, V. A., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Extrinsic life goals and health-risk behaviors in adolescents. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30(8), 1756–1771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lindsey M. Rodriguez
    • 1
  • Clayton Neighbors
    • 1
  • Dipali V. Rinker
    • 1
  • Jennifer L. Tackett
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of HoustonHoustonUSA

Personalised recommendations