Journal of Gambling Studies

, Volume 31, Issue 4, pp 1767–1788 | Cite as

A Gamblers Clustering Based on Their Favorite Gambling Activity

  • Gaëlle Challet-BoujuEmail author
  • Jean-Benoit Hardouin
  • Noëlle Renard
  • Cindy Legauffre
  • Marc Valleur
  • David Magalon
  • Mélina Fatséas
  • Isabelle Chéreau-Boudet
  • Mohamed-Ali Gorsane
  • JEU Group
  • Jean-Luc Vénisse
  • Marie Grall-Bronnec
Original Paper


The objective of this study was to identify profiles of gamblers to explain the choice of preferred gambling activity among both problem and non-problem gamblers. 628 non-problem and problem gamblers were assessed with a structured interview including “healthy” (sociodemographic characteristics, gambling habits and personality profile assessed with the Temperament and Character Inventory-125) and “pathological” [diagnosis of pathological gambling, gambling-related cognitions (GRCs) and psychiatric comorbidity] variables. We performed a two-step cluster analysis based solely on “healthy” variables to identify gamblers’ profiles which typically reflect the choice of preferred gambling activity. The obtained classes were then described using both “healthy” and “pathological” variables, by comparing each class to the rest of the sample. Clusters were generated. Class 1 (Electronic Gaming Machines gamblers) showed high cooperativeness, a lower level of GRC about strategy and more depressive disorders. Class 2 (games with deferred results gamblers) were high novelty seekers and showed a higher level of GRC about strategy and more addictive disorders. Class 3 (roulette gamblers) were more often high rollers and showed a higher level of GRC about strategy and more manic or hypomanic episodes and more obsessive–compulsive disorders. Class 4 (instant lottery gamblers) showed a lower tendency to suicide attempts. Class 5 (scratch cards gamblers) were high harm avoiders and showed a lower overall level of GRC and more panic attacks and eating disorders. The preference for one particular gambling activity may concern different profiles of gamblers. This study highlights the importance of considering the pair gambler-game rather than one or the other separately, and may provide support for future research on gambling and preventive actions directed toward a particular game.


Gambling Clustering Personality Gambling habits Distorted cognitions Continuous gambling 



We wish to sincerely thank all the staff who contributed to this study (JEU group), for their valuable assistance and significant investment. A special thanks to those who collected the data. We also want to thank Olé Bjerg and Claude Boutin for their kind permission to reproduce their game classifications. Members of the JEU Group are: Marie Grall-Bronnec, Gaëlle Challet-Bouju, Jean-Luc Vénisse, Lucia Romo, Cindy Legauffre, Caroline Dubertret, Irène Codina, Marc Valleur, Marc Auriacombe, Mélina Fatséas, Jean-Marc Alexandre, Pierre-Michel Llorca, Isabelle Chéreau-Boudet, Christophe Lançon, David Magalon, Michel Reynaud and Mohamed-Ali Gorsane. This study was supported by both the joint support of the French Inter-departmental Mission for the fight against drugs and drug addiction (MILDT) and the French National Institute of Health and Medical Research (INSERM), as part of the call for research projects launched by these two organizations in 2007, and a grant from the French Ministry of Health (PHRC 2009—RCB 2008-A01188-47). There were no constraints on publishing. This research was conducted at the initiative of and coordinated by the Clinical Investigation Unit BALANCED “BehaviorAL AddictioNs and ComplEx mood Disorders” of the University Hospital of Nantes, who is the sponsor of this study.

Conflict of interest

M.G.B., J.L.V. and G.C.B. declare that the University Hospital of Nantes has received funding from gambling industry (Française Des Jeux and Pari Mutuel Urbain) in the form of a sponsorship which supports the gambling section of the BALANCED Unit (the Reference Centre for Excessive Gambling). Scientific independence towards gambling industry operators is warranted. C.L. declares that the University of Paris Ouest Nanterre La Défense has received funding directly from gambling industry (Française Des Jeux and Pari Mutuel Urbain) as part of other research contracts—this funding has never had any influence on the present work. J.B.H., N.R., M.V., D.M., M.F., .I.C.B. and M.A.G. declare that they have no conflicts of interest. There were no constraints on publishing.


  1. Álvarez-Moya, E. M., Jiménez-Murcia, S., Aymamí, M. N., Gómez-Peña, M., Granero, R., Santamaría, J., et al. (2010). Subtyping study of a pathological gamblers sample. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 55(8), 498–506.Google Scholar
  2. APA. (2000). DSM-IV-TR. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4 th ed, text revision). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
  3. Bjerg, O. (2010). Problem gambling in poker: Money, rationality and control in a skill-based social game. International Gambling Studies, 10(3), 239–254. doi: 10.1080/14459795.2010.520330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bouju, G., Grall-Bronnec, M., Landreat-Guillou, M., & Vénisse, J. L. (2011). Jeu pathologique: facteurs impliqués. L’Encéphale, 37(4), 322–331. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2011.01.003.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bouju, G., Grall-Bronnec, M., Quistrebert-Davanne, V., Hardouin, J. B., & Vénisse, J. L. (2013). Texas hold’em poker: A qualitative analysis of gamblers’ perceptions. Journal of Gambling Issues (28), 1–28. doi: 10.4309/jgi.2013.28.4.
  6. Bouju, G., Hardouin, J. B., Boutin, C., Gorwood, P., Le Bourvellec, J. D., Feuillet, F., et al. (2014). A shorter and multidimensional version of the gambling attitudes and beliefs survey (GABS-23). Journal of Gambling Studies, 30(2), 349–367. doi: 10.1007/s10899-012-9356-3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Boutin, C. (2010). Le jeu: chance ou stratégie ?. Montréal: Choisir librement la place du jeu dans votre vie.Google Scholar
  8. Breen, R. B., & Zimmerman, M. (2002). Rapid onset of pathological gambling in machine gamblers. Journal of Gambling Studies, 18(1), 31–43.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Breen, R. B., & Zuckerman, M. (1999). ‘Chasing’ in gambling behavior: Personality and cognitive determinants. Personality and Individual Differences, 27(6), 1097–1111. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00052-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chakroun-Vinciguerra, N., Faytout, M., Pélissolo, A., & Swendsen, J. (2005). Validation française de la version courte de l’Inventaire du Tempérament et du Caractère (TCI-125). Journal de Thérapie Comportementale et Cognitive, 15(1), 27–33. doi: 10.1016/S1155-1704(05)81209-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Challet-Bouju, G., Hardouin, J. B., Vénisse, J. L., Romo, L., Valleur, M., Magalon, D., et al. (2014). Study protocol: The JEU cohort study—Transversal multiaxial evaluation and 5-year follow-up of a cohort of French gamblers. BMC Psychiatry, 14(1), 226. doi: 10.1186/s12888-014-0226-7.
  12. Cloninger, C. R., Svrakic, D. M., & Przybeck, T. R. (1993). A psychobiological model of temperament and character. Archives of General Psychiatry, 50(12), 975–990. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1993.01820240059008.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Dorfman, A., Bereby-Meyer, Y., & Moran, S. (2013). When feeling skillful impairs coordination in a lottery selection task. PLoS ONE, 8(6), e65092. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0065092.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Dowling, N., Smith, D., & Thomas, T. (2005). Electronic gaming machines: Are they the ‘crack-cocaine’ of gambling? [Review]. Addiction, 100(1), 33–45. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2004.00962.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Dreef, M., Borm, P., & Van der Genugten, B. (2004). Measuring skill in games: Several approaches discussed. Mathematical Methods of Operations Research (59), 375–391. doi: 10.1007/s001860400347.
  16. Echeburúa, E., González-Ortega, I., De Corral, P., & Polo-López, R. (2011). Clinical gender differences among adult pathological gamblers seeking treatment. Journal of Gambling Studies (27), 215–227. doi: 10.1007/s10899-010-9205-1.
  17. Everitt, B. S., Landau, S., Leese, M., & Stahl, D. (2011). Cluster analysis (5th ed.). Oxford: Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Grall-Bronnec, M., Bouju, G., Landréat-Guillou, M., & Vénisse, J. L. (2010). Evaluation sociodémographique, clinique et du parcours de jeu d’un échantillon de joueurs pathologiques français. L’Encéphale, 36(6), 452–460. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2010.02.002.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Grant, J. E., & Kim, S. W. (2002). Gender differences in pathological gamblers seeking medication treatment. [Comparative Study]. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 43(1), 56–62. doi: 10.1053/comp.2002.29857.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Grant, J. E., Odlaug, B. L., Chamberlain, S. R., & Schreiber, L. R. (2012). Neurocognitive dysfunction in strategic and non-strategic gamblers. Progress in Neuropsychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, 38(2), 336–340. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2012.05.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Griffiths, M. D. (1994). The role of cognitive bias and skill in fruit machine gambling. British Journal of Psychology, 85(3), 351–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Husson, F., Lê, S., & Pagès, J. (2010). Exploratory multivariate analysis by example using R (CRC computer science & data analysis). London: CRC Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Inserm. (2008). Jeux de hasard et d’argent: Contextes et addictions (pp. 1–497). Paris: Inserm - Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale.Google Scholar
  24. Jiménez-Murcia, S., Álvarez-Moya, E. M., Stinchfield, R., Fernández-Aranda, F., Granero, R., Aymamí, N., et al. (2010). Age of onset in pathological gambling: Clinical, therapeutic and personality correlates. Journal of Gambling Studies, 26(2), 235–248. doi: 10.1007/s10899-009-9175-3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Kelly, J. M., Dhar, Z., & Verbiest, T. (2007). Poker and the law: Is it a game of skill or chance and legally does it matter? Gaming law review, 11(3), 190–202. doi: 10.1089/glr.2007.11309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ladouceur, R., Gaboury, A., Dumont, M., & Rochette, P. (1988). Gambling: Relationship between the frequency of wins and irrational thinking. The Journal of Psychology, 122(4), 409–414. doi: 10.1080/00223980.1988.9915527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Langer, E. J., & Roth, J. (1975). Heads I win, tails it’s chance: The illusion of control as a function of the sequence of outcomes in a purely chance task. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32(6), 951–955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. LaPlante, D. A., Kleschinsky, J. H., LaBrie, R. A., Nelson, S. E., & Shaffer, H. J. (2009). Sitting at the virtual poker table: A prospective epidemiological study of actual Internet poker gambling behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(3), 711–717. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2008.12.027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Laplante, D. A., Nelson, S. E., & Gray, H. M. (2013). Breadth and depth involvement: Understanding internet gambling involvement and its relationship to gambling problems. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors,. doi: 10.1037/a0033810.Google Scholar
  30. Lecrubier, Y., Sheehan, D. V., Weiller, E., Amorim, P., Bonora, I., Harnett Sheehan, K., et al. (1997). The Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI). A short diagnostic structured interview: Reliability and validity according to the CIDI. European Psychiatry, 12(5), 224–231. doi: 10.1016/S0924-9338(97)83296-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Loba, P., Stewart, S. H., Klein, R. M., & Blackburn, J. R. (2001). Manipulations of the features of standard video lottery terminal (VLT) games: Effects in pathological and non-pathological gamblers. Journal of Gambling Studies, 17(4), 297–320.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Meyer, G., von Meduna, M., Brosowski, T., & Hayer, T. (2013). Is poker a game of skill or chance? A quasi-experimental study. Journal of Gambling Studies, 29(3), 535–550. doi: 10.1007/s10899-012-9327-8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Miller, J. D., Mackillop, J., Fortune, E. E., Maples, J., Lance, C. E., Keith Campbell, W., et al. (2013). Personality correlates of pathological gambling derived from Big Three and Big Five personality models. Psychiatry Research, 206(1), 50–55.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Odlaug, B. L., Schreiber, L. R., & Grant, J. E. (2013). Personality dimensions and disorders in pathological gambling. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 26(1), 107–112. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0b013e32835997df.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Petry, N. M. (2003). A comparison of treatment-seeking pathological gamblers based on preferred gambling activity. Addiction, 98(5), 645–655.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Petry, N. M., & Mallya, S. (2004). Gambling participation and problems among employees at a University Health Center. Journal of Gambling Studies, 20(2), 155–170. doi: 10.1023/B:JOGS.0000022307.09299.f5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Phillips, J. G., Ogeil, R., Chow, Y. W., & Blaszczynski, A. (2013). Gambling involvement and increased risk of gambling problems. Journal of Gambling Studies, 29(4), 601–611. doi: 10.1007/s10899-012-9325-x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Raylu, N., & Oei, T. P. (2002). Pathological gambling. A comprehensive review. Clinical Psychology Review, 22(7), 1009–1061. doi: 10.1016/S0272-7358(02)00101-0.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Sharpe, L. (2002). A reformulated cognitive–behavioral model of problem gambling: A biopsychosocial perspective. Clinical Psychology Review, 22(1), 1–25. doi: 10.1016/S0272-7358(00)00087-8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Shead, N. W., Hodgins, D. C., & Scharf, D. (2008). Differences between poker players and non-poker-playing gamblers. International Gambling Studies, 8(2), 167–178. doi: 10.1080/14459790802139991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Stevens, M., & Young, M. (2010). Who plays what? Participation profiles in chance versus skill-based gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 26(1), 89–103. doi: 10.1007/s10899-009-9143-y.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Toneatto, T., & Ladouceur, R. (2003). Treatment of pathological gambling: A critical review of the literature. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors: Journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors, 17(4), 284–292. doi: 10.1037/0893-164X.17.4.284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Toneatto, T., & Millar, G. (2004). Assessing and treating problem gambling: Empirical status and promising trends. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 49(8), 517–525.Google Scholar
  44. Turner, N. E., & Fritz, B. (2001). The effect of skilled gamblers on the success of less skilled gamblers. The Journal of Gambling Issues. doi: 10.4309/jgi.2001.5.10.
  45. Walker, M. B. (1992). Irrational thinking among slot machine players. Journal of Gambling Studies, 8(3), 245–261. doi: 10.1007/BF01014652.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Welte, J. W., Barnes, G. M., Wieczorek, W. F., Tidwell, M. C. O., & Hoffman, J. H. (2007). Type of gambling and availability as risk factors for problem gambling: A Tobit regression analysis by age and gender. International Gambling Studies, 7(2), 183–198. doi: 10.1080/14459790701387543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Welte, J. W., Barnes, G. M., Wieczorek, W. F., Tidwell, M. C., & Parker, J. (2002). Gambling participation in the U.S.—Results from a national survey. Journal of Gambling Studies, 18(4), 313–337.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Welte, J. W., Barnes, G. M., Wieczorek, W. F., Tidwell, M. C. O., & Parker, J. C. (2004). Risk factors for pathological gambling. Addictive Behaviors, 29(2), 323–335. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2003.08.007.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gaëlle Challet-Bouju
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Jean-Benoit Hardouin
    • 2
    • 3
  • Noëlle Renard
    • 1
    • 2
  • Cindy Legauffre
    • 4
    • 5
  • Marc Valleur
    • 6
  • David Magalon
    • 7
  • Mélina Fatséas
    • 8
  • Isabelle Chéreau-Boudet
    • 9
  • Mohamed-Ali Gorsane
    • 10
    • 11
  • JEU Group
  • Jean-Luc Vénisse
    • 1
    • 2
  • Marie Grall-Bronnec
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Clinical Investigation Unit BALANCED “BehaviorAL AddictioNs and ComplEx mood Disorders”, Federative Institute of Behavioral AddictionsCHU de Nantes - Hôpital Saint Jacques - IFACNantes Cedex 1France
  2. 2.EA 4275 SPHERE “bioStatistics, Pharmacoepidemiology and Human sciEnces Research tEam”, Faculties of Medicine and Pharmaceutical SciencesUniversity of NantesNantesFrance
  3. 3.Unit of Methodology and BiostatisticsUniversity Hospital of NantesNantesFrance
  4. 4.EA 4430 CLIPSYD «CLInique PSYchanalyse Développement»University of Paris Ouest Nanterre La DéfenseNanterreFrance
  5. 5.Louis Mourier Hospital of ColombesAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP)ParisFrance
  6. 6.Marmottan Medical CenterGPS Perray-VaucluseParisFrance
  7. 7.Department of Adult PsychiatrySainte-Marguerite University Hospital of MarseilleMarseilleFrance
  8. 8.Psychiatry Laboratory, Sanpsy CNRS USR 3413University of Bordeaux and Charles Perrens HospitalBordeauxFrance
  9. 9.Psychiatry DepartmentUniversity Hospital of Clermont-FerrandClermont-FerrandFrance
  10. 10.Psychiatry and Addictology Department, Paul Brousse University Hospital of VillejuifAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP)ParisFrance
  11. 11.Addictology DepartmentUniversity Hospital Group Henri Mondor of CreteilCreteilFrance

Personalised recommendations