Heuristic and Analytic Processing in Online Sports Betting
- 795 Downloads
This article presents the results of two studies that examine the occurrence of heuristic (i.e., intuitive and fast) and analytic (i.e., deliberate and slow) processes among people who engage in online sports betting on a regular basis. The first study was qualitative and was conducted with a convenience sample of 12 regular online sports gamblers who described the processes by which they arrive at a sports betting decision. The results of this study showed that betting online on sports events involves a mix of heuristic and analytic processes. The second study consisted in a survey of 161 online sports gamblers where performance in terms of monetary gains, experience in online sports betting, propensity to collect and analyze relevant information prior to betting, and use of bookmaker odds were measured. This study showed that heuristic and analytic processes act as mediators of the relationship between experience and performance. The findings stemming of these two studies give some insights into gamblers’ modes of thinking and behaviors in an online sports betting context and show the value of the dual mediation process model for research that looks at gambling activities from a judgment and decision making perspective.
KeywordsSports betting Online betting Heuristics Analytic processing Dual mediation
- Allcock, C. (1985). How to gamble in the eighties. In J. McMillen (Ed.), Proceedings of the inaugural conference of the national association for gambling studies (pp. 240–246). Retrieved from http://www.nags.org.au/pdf/Proceedings%2085.pdf.
- ARJEL (Autorité de régulation des jeux en ligne). (2012). Statistics retrieved from www.arjel.fr/.
- Carroll, J. S., & Johnson, E. J. (1990). Decision research: A field guide. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Daries, E., & Maufras, J. (2011). Gagner aux paris sportifs. Paris: Eyrolles.Google Scholar
- Gilovich, T., & Griffin, D. (2010). Judgment and decision making. In S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 542–588). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
- Kahneman, D., & Frederick, S. (2002). Representativeness revisited: Attribute Substitution in intuitive judgment. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 49–81). Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- MacKinnon, D. P. (2008). Introduction to statistical mediation analysis. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- Online Casino City. (2012). Statistics retrieved from http://online.casinocity.com/.
- Pavée, F. (2010). Paris sportifs en ligne: Mode d’emploi. France: RMC Sports.Google Scholar
- Scott, D. (1982). The winning way to successful punting. Sydney: Puntwin.Google Scholar
- Stanovich, K. E. (1999). Who is rational? Studies of individual differences in reasoning. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Toulemonde, Q. (2011). Paris sportifs en ligne: Comprendre—jouer—gagner. France: Amphora.Google Scholar
- Wagenaar, W. (1988). Paradoxes of gambling behaviour. London: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Williams, R. J., & Wood, R. T. (2007). Internet gambling: A comprehensive review and synthesis of the literature. Guelph: Report prepared for the Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre.Google Scholar
- Ziemba, W. T., & Hausch, D. B. (1984). Beat the racetrack. San Diego, CA: Harcourt Brace Jovanovitch.Google Scholar