A Descriptive Analysis of Demographic and Behavioral Data from Internet Gamblers and Those Who Self-exclude from Online Gambling Platforms
As the popularity of internet gambling increases, the increased opportunities to participate serve to heighten concerns about the potential for gambling related harm. This paper focuses on self-exclusion as one of the main responsible gaming interventions, and is split into three sections. Firstly, we set out a three-tier model for assessing at-risk gambling behaviors which examines player exhibited, declared and inferred behavior. Secondly, we present a literature review relating to who self-excludes and whether self-exclusion is effective. Finally, we report the results of an analysis of the exhibited behavior of internet self-excluders as sampled from a research cohort of over 240,000 internet gaming accounts. Our analysis of self-excluders (N = 347) versus a control group (N = 871) of gamblers indicates self-excluders are younger than the control group, more likely to suffer losses and more likely to adopt riskier gambling positions. Unlike some previous studies, there was little difference in terms of mean gambling hours per month or minutes per session. Some self-excluders (N = 306) can be tracked from the date their account was created through their self-exclusion history, indicating a large number of very quick self-exclusions (e.g., 25 % within a day) and a small set of serial self-excluders. Younger and older males are likely to self-exclude faster than middle-aged males (N = 242), but there is no such age pattern across female self-excluders (N = 63).
KeywordsInternet gambling Self-exclusion Problem gambling Behavioral analysis Three-tier model
- American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual for mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
- Bet Buddy. (2010). How player limits boost operator profits. Retrieved from: http://bet-buddy.blogspot.co.uk/search/label/limits.
- Blaszczynski, A., Ladouceur, R., & Nower, J. D. (2004). Self-exclusion: A gateway to treatment. Report prepared for the Australian Gaming Council.Google Scholar
- Blau, M. (2013). British Broadcasting Corporation. The bottom line—gambling. 31st January 2013. Retrieved from: http://www.bbc.co.uk/podcasts/series/bottomline.
- De Bruin, D. E., Leenders, F. R. J., Fris, M., Verbraeck, H. T., Braam, R. V., & van de Wijngaart, G. F. (2001). Visitors of Holland Casino: Effectiveness of the policy for the prevention of problem gambling. The Netherlands: Addictions Research Institute, CVO University of Utrecht.Google Scholar
- Derevensky, J., & Gupta, R. (2004). Preface. In J. L. Derevensky & R. Gupta (Eds.), Gambling problems in youth. Theoretical and applied perspectives. Berlin: Plenum Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
- Ferris, J., & Wynne, H. (2001, 19 February). The Canadian Problem Gambling Index: Final report. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse, Retrieved from http://www.ccsa.ca/2003%20and%20earlier%20CCSA%20Documents/ccsa-008805-2001.pdf.
- Gainsbury, S. (2013) Review of self-exclusion from gambling venues as an intervention for problem gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies. doi:10.1007/s10899-013-9362-0.
- Gambling Commission. (2010). Conditions and codes of practice (consolidated version). Retrieved from: http://www.gamblingcommission.gov.uk/pdf/Licence%20conditions%20and%20codes%20of%20practice%20-%20remote%20betting%20-%20October%202010.pdf.
- GamCare. (2010). GamCare player protection code of practice responsible gambling; Remote. Retrieved from: http://www.gamcaretradeservices.com/data/files/v5_nov_2010_gamcare_code.pdf.
- Global Betting and Gaming Consultants. (2012). Gross gaming revenue global forecasts. Isle of Man, British Isles: Global Gaming Outlook.Google Scholar
- Haefeli, J., Lischer, S., & Schwarz, J. (2011). Early detection items and responsible gambling features for online gambling. International Gambling Studies, 11(3), 273–288.Google Scholar
- Meyer, G., Hayer, T., & Griffths, M. D. (2009). Problem gambling in Europe: Challenges, prevention, and intervention. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- National Research Council. (1999). Pathological gambling: A critical review. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
- O’Neil, M., Whetton, S., Dolman, B., Herbert, M., Giannopolous, V., & O’Neil, D. (2003). Part A—Evaluation of self-exclusion programs in Victoria and Part B—Summary of self-exclusion programs in Australian States and Territories. Report to Gambling Research Panel. Victoria: The SA Centre for Economic Studies.Google Scholar
- Productivity Commission. (2010). Gambling. Report no. 50, Canberra. Retrieved from http://www.pc.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0010/95707/24-appendixb.pdf.
- Responsible Gambling Council. (2008). From enforcement to assistance: Evolving best practices in self-exclusion. Discussion paper by the Responsible Gambling Council.Google Scholar
- South Australian Centre for Economic Studies. (2003). Evaluation of self-exclusion programs (Part A: Evaluation of self-exclusion programs in Victoria) (No. 2). Victoria, Australia: The Victorian Gambling Research Panel.Google Scholar
- Steinberg, M., & Velardo, W., (2002). Preliminary evaluation of a casino self-exclusion program. Paper presented at the Responsible Gambling Councils Discover Conference, Niagara Falls, Canada.Google Scholar
- Wardle, H. (2012). Understanding self-exclusion—Profile, processes and improvements: Evidence and implications from a research study of online betting exchange users. Responsible Gambling Council Discovery 2012 Conference. Retrieved from http://www.responsiblegambling.org/docs/discovery-2012/understanding-self-exclusion-profile-processes-and-improvements-evidence-and-implications-from-a-research-study-of-online-betting-exchange-users.pdf?sfvrsn=12.
- Wardle, H., Moody, A., Spence, S., Orford, J., Volberg, R., & Jotangla, D. (2011b). British Gambling Prevalence Survey 2010. Birmingham: Gambling Commission.Google Scholar
- Wardle, H., Sproston, K., Orford, J., Erens, B., Griffiths, M., Constantine, R., et al. (2007). British Gambling Prevalence Survey 2007. Brmingham: Gambling Commission.Google Scholar