Journal of Gambling Studies

, Volume 31, Issue 1, pp 105–132 | Cite as

A Descriptive Analysis of Demographic and Behavioral Data from Internet Gamblers and Those Who Self-exclude from Online Gambling Platforms

  • Simo Dragicevic
  • Christian Percy
  • Aleksandar Kudic
  • Jonathan Parke
Original Paper


As the popularity of internet gambling increases, the increased opportunities to participate serve to heighten concerns about the potential for gambling related harm. This paper focuses on self-exclusion as one of the main responsible gaming interventions, and is split into three sections. Firstly, we set out a three-tier model for assessing at-risk gambling behaviors which examines player exhibited, declared and inferred behavior. Secondly, we present a literature review relating to who self-excludes and whether self-exclusion is effective. Finally, we report the results of an analysis of the exhibited behavior of internet self-excluders as sampled from a research cohort of over 240,000 internet gaming accounts. Our analysis of self-excluders (N = 347) versus a control group (N = 871) of gamblers indicates self-excluders are younger than the control group, more likely to suffer losses and more likely to adopt riskier gambling positions. Unlike some previous studies, there was little difference in terms of mean gambling hours per month or minutes per session. Some self-excluders (N = 306) can be tracked from the date their account was created through their self-exclusion history, indicating a large number of very quick self-exclusions (e.g., 25 % within a day) and a small set of serial self-excluders. Younger and older males are likely to self-exclude faster than middle-aged males (N = 242), but there is no such age pattern across female self-excluders (N = 63).


Internet gambling Self-exclusion Problem gambling Behavioral analysis Three-tier model 


  1. American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual for mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  2. Bet Buddy. (2010). How player limits boost operator profits. Retrieved from:
  3. Blaszczynski, A., Ladouceur, R., & Nower, J. D. (2004). Self-exclusion: A gateway to treatment. Report prepared for the Australian Gaming Council.Google Scholar
  4. Blau, M. (2013). British Broadcasting Corporation. The bottom linegambling. 31st January 2013. Retrieved from:
  5. Braverman, J., & Shaffer, H. J. (2012). How do gamblers start gambling: Identifying behavioural markers for high-risk internet gambling. The European Journal of Public Health, 22(2), 273–278.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Brosowski, T., Meyer, G., & Hayer, T. (2012). Analyses of multiple types of online gambling within one provider: An extended evaluation framework of actual online gambling behaviour. International Gambling Studies, 12(3), 405–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. De Bruin, D. E., Leenders, F. R. J., Fris, M., Verbraeck, H. T., Braam, R. V., & van de Wijngaart, G. F. (2001). Visitors of Holland Casino: Effectiveness of the policy for the prevention of problem gambling. The Netherlands: Addictions Research Institute, CVO University of Utrecht.Google Scholar
  8. Delfabbro, P., & Thrupp, L. (2003). The social determinants of youth gambling in South Australian adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 26(3), 313–330.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Derevensky, J., & Gupta, R. (2004). Preface. In J. L. Derevensky & R. Gupta (Eds.), Gambling problems in youth. Theoretical and applied perspectives. Berlin: Plenum Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
  10. Dragicevic, S., Tsogas, G., & Kudic, A. (2011). Analysis of casino online gambling data in relation to behavioural risk markers for high-risk gambling and player protection. International Gambling Studies, 11(3), 377–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ferris, J., & Wynne, H. (2001, 19 February). The Canadian Problem Gambling Index: Final report. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse, Retrieved from
  12. Gainsbury, S. (2011). Player account-based gambling: Potentials for behaviour-based research methodologies. International Gambling Studies, 11(2), 153–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gainsbury, S. (2013) Review of self-exclusion from gambling venues as an intervention for problem gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies. doi: 10.1007/s10899-013-9362-0.
  14. Gainsbury, S., Parke, J., & Suhonen, N. (2012). Consumer attitudes towards internet gambling: Perceptions of responsible gambling policies, consumer protection, and regulation of online gambling sites. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(1), 235–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gambling Commission. (2010). Conditions and codes of practice (consolidated version). Retrieved from:
  16. GamCare. (2010). GamCare player protection code of practice responsible gambling; Remote. Retrieved from:
  17. Global Betting and Gaming Consultants. (2012). Gross gaming revenue global forecasts. Isle of Man, British Isles: Global Gaming Outlook.Google Scholar
  18. Goudriaan, A. E., Slutske, W. S., Krull, J. L., & Sher, K. J. (2009). Longitudinal patterns of gambling activities and associated risk factors in college students. Addiction, 104(7), 1219–1232.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Gray, H. M., LaPlante, D. A., & Shaffer, H. J. (2012). Behavioral characteristics of internet gamblers who trigger corporate responsible gambling interventions. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors. doi: 10.1037/a0028545.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Griffiths, M. D., Wood, R. T. A., & Parke, J. (2009). Social responsibility tools in online gambling: A survey of attitudes and behavior among internet gamblers. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 12, 413–421.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Haefeli, J., Lischer, S., & Schwarz, J. (2011). Early detection items and responsible gambling features for online gambling. International Gambling Studies, 11(3), 273–288.Google Scholar
  22. Hayer, T., & Meyer, G. (2011a). Self-exclusion as a harm minimization strategy: Evidence for the casino sector from selected European countries. Journal of Gambling Studies, 27(4), 685–700.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Hayer, T., & Meyer, G. (2011b). Internet self-exclusion: Characteristics of self-excluded gamblers and preliminary evidence for its effectiveness. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 9, 307–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hodgins, D. C., Wynne, H., & Makarchuk, K. (1999). Pathways to recovery from gambling problems: Follow-up from a general population survey. Journal of Gambling Studies, 15(2), 93–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Johansson, A., & Götestam, K. G. (2003). Gambling and problematic gambling with money among Norwegian youth (12–18 years). Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, 57(4), 317–321.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. King, G., & Zeng, L. (2001). Logistic regression in rare events. Political Analysis, 9(2), 137–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. LaBrie, R. A., & Shaffer, H. J. (2011). Identifying behavioral markers of disordered internet sports gambling. Addiction Research and Theory, 19(1), 56–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ladouceur, R., Jacques, C., Giroux, I., Ferland, F., & Leblond, J. (2000). Analysis of a casino’s self-exclusion program. Journal of Gambling Studies, 16, 453–460.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Ladouceur, R., Sylvain, C., & Gosselin, P. (2007). Self-exclusion program: A longitudinal evaluation study. Journal of Gambling Studies, 23(1), 85–94.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Lam, D., & Mizerski, R. (2009). An investigation into gambling purchases using the NBD and NBD—Dirichlet models. Marketing Letters, 20(3), 263–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. LaPlante, D. A., Kleschinsky, J. H., LaBrie, R. A., Nelson, S. E., & Shaffer, H. J. (2009). Sitting at the virtual poker table: A prospective epidemiological study of actual internet poker gambling behaviour. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 711–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Meyer, G., Hayer, T., & Griffths, M. D. (2009). Problem gambling in Europe: Challenges, prevention, and intervention. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  33. National Research Council. (1999). Pathological gambling: A critical review. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  34. Nelson, S. E., Kleschinsky, J. H., LaBrie, R. A., Kaplan, S., & Shaffer, H. J. (2010). One decade of self-exclusion: Missouri casino self-excluders four to ten years after enrolment. Journal of Gambling Studies, 26(1), 129–144.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Nowatzki, N. R., & Williams, R. J. (2002). Casino self-exclusion programmes: A review of the issues 1. International Gambling Studies, 2(1), 3–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nower, L., & Blaszczynski, A. (2006). Characteristics and gender differences among self-excluded casino problem gamblers: Missouri data. Journal of Gambling Studies, 22, 81–99.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. O’Neil, M., Whetton, S., Dolman, B., Herbert, M., Giannopolous, V., & O’Neil, D. (2003). Part A—Evaluation of self-exclusion programs in Victoria and Part B—Summary of self-exclusion programs in Australian States and Territories. Report to Gambling Research Panel. Victoria: The SA Centre for Economic Studies.Google Scholar
  38. Productivity Commission. (2010). Gambling. Report no. 50, Canberra. Retrieved from
  39. Responsible Gambling Council. (2008). From enforcement to assistance: Evolving best practices in self-exclusion. Discussion paper by the Responsible Gambling Council.Google Scholar
  40. Shaffer, H. J., & Hall, M. N. (1996). Estimating the prevalence of adolescent gambling disorders: A quantitative synthesis and guide toward standard gambling nomenclature. Journal of Gambling Studies, 12(2), 193–214.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. South Australian Centre for Economic Studies. (2003). Evaluation of self-exclusion programs (Part A: Evaluation of self-exclusion programs in Victoria) (No. 2). Victoria, Australia: The Victorian Gambling Research Panel.Google Scholar
  42. Steinberg, M., & Velardo, W., (2002). Preliminary evaluation of a casino self-exclusion program. Paper presented at the Responsible Gambling Councils Discover Conference, Niagara Falls, Canada.Google Scholar
  43. Tremblay, N., Boutin, C., & Ladouceur, R. (2008). Improved self-exclusion program: Preliminary results. Journal of Gambling Studies, 24(4), 505–518.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Wardle, H. (2012). Understanding self-exclusion—Profile, processes and improvements: Evidence and implications from a research study of online betting exchange users. Responsible Gambling Council Discovery 2012 Conference. Retrieved from
  45. Wardle, H., Moody, A., Griffiths, M., Orford, J., & Volberg, R. (2011a). Defining the online gambler and patterns of behaviour integration: Evidence from the British Gambling Prevalence Survey 2010. International Gambling Studies, 11, 339–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wardle, H., Moody, A., Spence, S., Orford, J., Volberg, R., & Jotangla, D. (2011b). British Gambling Prevalence Survey 2010. Birmingham: Gambling Commission.Google Scholar
  47. Wardle, H., Sproston, K., Orford, J., Erens, B., Griffiths, M., Constantine, R., et al. (2007). British Gambling Prevalence Survey 2007. Brmingham: Gambling Commission.Google Scholar
  48. Xuan, Z., & Shaffer, H. (2009). How do gamblers end gambling: Longitudinal analysis of Internet gambling behaviors prior to account closure due to gambling related problems. Journal of Gambling Studies, 25(2), 239–252.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Simo Dragicevic
    • 1
  • Christian Percy
    • 1
  • Aleksandar Kudic
    • 2
  • Jonathan Parke
    • 3
  1. 1.Bet BuddyLondonUK
  2. 2.GTECHLondonUK
  3. 3.The Gambling LabNewarkUK

Personalised recommendations